What Is The Law, and Why Are Most Activities Now Considered Illegal By The State?

Just about every action in our daily lives is now considered illegal. But what is the Law exactly? The game is so rigged against we, the registered property of the state, that it has become difficult to ignore. Some are worried that if we shrank government, we would have anarchy, or if we distributed wealth there would be socialism. The fact is that we already have anarchy, because governments break the Law, Judges break the Law, Police break the Law, and corporations break the Law. We already have Socialism, but only for the rich -hence those “Bailouts” for the wealthy bankers. The poor have access only to the modern feudalism that was once upon a time based on Free Market Capitalism, built upon the skeleton of something called a “Democratic Republic.” These old English terms may be difficult to comprehend in today’s doublethink that is Corporate Fascism advertised as Democracy. Our journey essentially began with a Birth Certificate. Why do the words, “Midwest Bank Note Company” appear at the bottom of a notarized document edged with webbing very similar to the one-dollar-bill’s edged webbing? Your birth certificate is worth a hell of a lot more than a dollar, but only to the FED and only in estimated tax revenue over the course of a lifetime -valued at approximately $700,000. Our bodies have become Corporations, and Corporations have in turn become “Persons.” Citizens United was just the beginning. Instead of abiding to the Common Law of the Land, these Corporate Persons make Policy, which Police enforce. Is there anything the politicians could enact into Law that the the police wouldn’t perform? Isn’t there something inherently unethical about obeying laws that put people in jail for petty, technical offenses while keeping other people out of jail for enormous crimes? Is there anything we can do to reclaim the Old Republic?


Law is more than the Policeman on the corner, the enforcement of the courthouse, or the punishment of the jail. Law is one of three forms of Social Control which regulate our daily lives. The first is the Custom, which accounts for what we typically do. The second is the Moral Code, which dictates what we should do. Then there is the Law, know as “that we must do.” Law is supposed to be a body of rules created by representatives of the people and enforced by established means. There are many don’ts in these Laws, which are ever more prohibitionary. Ideally Law prohibits what the majority decide is wrong but the majority have nearly nothing to do with this process, as should be clearly by the number of drug offenders languishing in chains for petty marijuana possession charges. Law should direct what is agreed to be right, but today it only directs what the Corporations agree to be profitable. Now they’re working toward Superstate legal systems and eventually a world legal system. Technically speaking this has already happened with the Rothschild owned Bank For International Settlements, although for now it remains strictly in the world of finance.

Instead of merely complaining about how unbelievably out of control our militarized domestic police forces have become, let us instead arm ourselves with the knowledge of the Law – knowledge you won’t be taught in Law School. You don’t need to be a Lawyer to understand the Law, and you certainly don’t need to be a member of the BAR association to write up your own legal documents. Those who have endeavored to understand our modern legal system have left us plenty of breadcrumbs along the dark forest path to discover the diamonds of our freedom. The keys to the temple are yours, but you’ll have to turn the lock yourself. This is the story of your enslavement. How it happened and how you can finally regain your freedom.



What is the Law? You’ve heard people say, “No man is above the Law.” So what Law are they talking about? What Laws apply to every single Human Being on this Earth?

The dust has barely settled on the ruthless killing of 38 year-old James Boyd at the hands of Albuquerque police officers. Boyd was shot multiple times and executed for being homeless, a crime they have deemed, illegal camping. A video of the shooting that went viral illustrates one of the body armor covered officers yelling “booyah” after shooting Boyd in the back.

The astonishing brutality prompted more than a thousand protesters to take to streets, expressing outrage over the police murder not just of Boyd, but dozens of fatal police shootings since 2010. These protesters were themselves brutally beaten down by riot police claiming the crowd to be an illegal assembly, and hours after the protests the APD murdered another person whose name has not yet been released. If only police enforced Banking Regulations with the same violent ferocity they do with Camping Restrictions and so-called Illegal Assemblies.

Two days after the protests, US Marshalls in Albuquerque added another state-sponsored corpse to the list of killings by authorities, executing Gilberto Angelo Serrano with a single gunshot would to the head before seizing cameras from surrounding witnesses. Their efforts proved to be in vein, because one video still made it online. Also just this week Sgt. Joey Smith drew his firearm on 11 year-old Omari Grant in Henry-County Georgia because he was building a tree fort. The fifth-grader is now so traumatized he’s hesitant to go outside in his own neighborhood.

Now you may be thinking these are isolated incidents that don’t effect you, but you might do well to take another look around this so-called Republik we’re living in today. The frightening reality of these all-too-common stories is that many police are more interested in citizen subservience than upholding their oath to the constitution. Here in Montana we needn’t look any farther than the recent viral Youtube sensation that is Bozeman mountain man Ernie Wayne Tertelgte, and the frivolous persecution against him in the name of these so-called Laws, to see how the game is rigged against we, the registered property of the state. Today’s systems of Law are a long way from the Magna Carta or Hammurabi’s Code, and has transformed into the Corporate fiction that is darling of the dictators and the plague of the people.


In a world where police can murder the homeless and be called heroes, one might wonder where our country went so radically off course. Just about every action in our daily lives is now considered illegal with statutory limitations dictating everything from permission to build structures on property we apparently own, to the ingestion of ancient plants older than civilization itself. Despite having next to no legal training whatsoever and no requirement to have earned a college degree, police officers are all too willing to follow their superiors’ orders for a pat-on-the-back and an atta-boy, even though said orders might be completely out of line with the constitution, the Bill of Rights and most importantly the Law.

Instead of merely complaining about how unbelievably out of control our militarized domestic police forces have become, let us instead arm ourselves with the knowledge of the Law – knowledge you won’t be taught in Law School. You don’t need to be a lawyer to understand the Law, and you certainly don’t need to be a member of the BAR association to write up your own legal documents. Those who have endeavored to understand our modern legal system have left us plenty of breadcrumbs along the dark forest path to discover the diamonds of our freedom. The keys to the temple are yours, but you’ll have to turn the lock yourself.



In this game they have us playing, there is a hierarchy to Law. Natural Law is supreme, entailing your rights and duties to those who you love. Imagine for a moment you’re in a forest. You live there alone with your family and no one else is around. Your rights and duties to your family essentially boil down to the Natural Law.

Below Natural Law exists Commercial Law. Now suppose in this forest that not just you in this forest, there is another family 100 miles away. Once a month you want to trade your berries for his fish. The commercial Law will now direct your transactions. Commercial Law is primarily concerned with trust because you need to be able to trust the people you’re engaging in Commercial interactions with.

Below Commercial Law exists Common Law. Now imagine that in this forest, whereas before there were only two families, now you have hundreds of families living there. At this point a certain system or structure is needed that will allow all of these people the protection that Commercial Law will afford them. It boils down to the Magna Carta which essentially said that Governments within this structure are bound by their own rules.

So what is the Magna Carta? Back in the days of Robin Hood, King John the tyrant was an actual historical figure who despite wanting to fight expensive and bloody wars, didn’t know anything about how to fight a war. He also lacked the funding to simply overwhelm opposing forces with resources, and having no land to his name, asked Pope innocent III for financial aid. In doing so he turned the entire Kingdom of England over to the Pope and thus promised loyalty. Within just a few years many of his angry Barons (the notorious “Four and Twenty Overlords) cornered him and forced him to sign the Magna Carta. This became the basis of English Law, and in turn American Law, as well as Australia, New Zealand, South Africa et. Al; any Crown Colony’s legal system is based on this document. It is the model for the American Bill of Rights, and the founding document for modern human rights declarations.

So we’ve explored the three systems of Law which deal with you as a Natural Human Being: Common Law, Commercial Law and Natural Law. But there are also forms of Law to deal with your Legal Corporate Person, and they’re known as Statutes, Regulations Bylaws and Orders. These don’t act on your body at all, but instead only act upon your Legal Person. They act only in your “Equity.”  You can only enter into Equity voluntarily. No one can ever force you into it. That’s why they’re utilizing Applications, Registrations and Submissions with your signature on them.”

In his seminal documentary Kymatica, Ben Stewart helps shed more light on this slippery concept:

“A common misconception among people is that any rule or regulation that governs them falls under one category: Law.  But there are many other forms of Law that people abide by without realizing that they simply do not apply to them. One of the predominant beliefs in modern culture is that licenses, permits, registrations and other forms of documentation are required to operate motor vehicles, us public roads, build structures and establishments, engage in free enterprise and much more. Sadly, these beliefs are based on little to no investigation whatsoever, and are false. Drivers Licenses, vehicle registrations, auto insurance forms, building permits, gun permits, work permits, tax filing documents, birth and death certificates, traffic citations and many other forms of documentation that were once believed to be absolutely necessary, only apply to Persons.”



“Do you know that the word ‘person’ means ‘mask’? The ‘persona’ which is the mask worn by actors in Greco-Roman drama, because it has a megaphone-type mouth which throws the sound out in an open-air theater. So the ‘per’–through–‘sona’–what the sound comes through–that’s the mask. How to be a real person. How to be a genuine fake. So the ‘dramatis persona’ at the beginning of a play is the list of masks that the actors will wear. And so in the course of forgetting that this world is a drama, the word for the role, the word for the mask has come to mean who you are genuinely. The person. The proper person. Incidentally, the word ‘parson’ is derived from the word ‘person.’ The ‘person’ of the village. The ‘person’ around town, the parson.”   ~Alan Watts

Slavery has always existed in some form or another. One method is to apply henchmen to force another tribe into obedience, which requires defeating them with force. Another method employees a much more clever deception, allowing the people to keep so much of their earnings for themselves to maintain themselves, and take off all the rest to supply the elite and the overall central banking structure.What is the definition of a slave? There are essentially two:

1) A person who is the legal property of another and forced to obey them

2) A person who is excessively dependent upon or controlled by something

So if we want to be free, perhaps we need to get rid of the dependencies and controls in our lives Judge Napolitano asks, “What is the consent of the Governed?”

“Natural rights are inherent to your humanity and the source of your humanity as a free individual. Just as slaves had the moral and legal right to leave those enslaving them; just as the States have the moral and legal right to leave a union that violates the Constitution that binds them; so too you have the moral right to live without a government when it breaks its own Laws. The federal government claims your consent through the Constitution. The Constitution is a social contract that binds the American people to their government. Did you freely consent to this? I don’t know anybody who did. So since none of us consented to the Constitution, either the government stays within the confines of the Constitution, or we can ignore or change the government.

This view, called the Consent of the Governed, was widely and openly accepted by the Framers. They gave us a Constitution which defines limits and constrains the government. This is why adherence to the Constitution by all government is so crucial to preserving and retaining our freedoms. The Constitution formalizes the relationship between sovereign people and sovereign States and the Federal Government. When the Constitution is ignored, so is our sovereignty, and if we can’t avoid a government to which we never gave consent and which violates the Constitution, so will our freedoms be ignored.”

Consent is the primary issue surrounding all contracts. Without a meeting of the minds, no contract can exist. So if you don’t like what is being done on your behalf, you must withdraw consent. This means you cannot remain silent. Silence is consent. Because while we’re silent on these impositions, they continue on forever by our silence we are acquiescing even agreeing to them being imposed. If we don’t withdraw our consent at this point, we Legally speaking, deserve whatever the bankers decide to give us. We don’t need to hate them, we just have to stop cooperating with them.

As Human Beings, we have natural rights. But our system has persuaded us to waive those rights for the benefits of the ‘society.’ These so-called “benefits” aren’t benefits at all. They’re made to seem like benefits, but they’re actually all liabilities, and work against the people instead of benefiting them. The architects of this system did not build it for us, they built it to serve them. The system allows a wealthy, parasitic elite to continue in their lap of luxury supported by all of us working our asses off to keep them where they are. We’ve given up our rights primarily because we don’t know what our rights are. And that’s where the Freemen come in; a movement of courageous rebels standing up to the courts and the cops, withdrawing their consent, and keeping our rights from disappearing.

To withdraw consent is to be in a state of Lawful Rebellion. This is what the upside-down American flag is meant to signify; a nation in crisis.

So how does one go about withdrawing their consent?


In a crowded pub in Dublin in the year 2012, a young man by the name of Aidan Killian illustrated one method for withdrawing consent:

“Jesus ended up in court against Judge Pontius Pilot. And just to clarify I don’t care if you believe that Jesus was god, the son of god or whether he existed or not. What I think is cool are the stories and one of the stories that I particularly like is when he is court against Pontius Pilot, and Pilot says, “Are you Jesus Christ, King of the Jews?” Now, Jesus didn’t say yes; he didn’t say no. He said, “Is it you whose asking?” Because if Jesus said yes, he’s saying yes to being a name and the courts wanted jurisdiction over that name, and even if everything he said was truth fact and honor he could lose. If he says, “no” he’s in dispute thus causing controversy, again the courts have jurisdiction, and he could lose. So answering a question with a question, that’s ingenious. Now, I know it didn’t work out perfectly for Jesus in the end, but I think he was onto something.

“So I get this call from a private number and I know most people in debt are smart enough not to answer private numbers… but I answer:


“Is that Aidan Killian speaking?”  At this point I’m wondering why someone would ring me if they don’t know who I am?

“Who’s speaking please?”

“Oh hi it’s Veronica here from the Bank of Ireland.”

“Initially this upset me, but then I got to thinking -maybe this is not a bad thing. Maybe she’s not ringing from the collections department over 372,000 Euros that’s never going to be paid. Maybe she’s ringing to tell me the truth; that money (to be more accurate currency) comes from nothing, its backed by nothing and therefore all debts and all mortgages are just an illusion. Maybe she’s ringing to apologize on behalf of her employers for their greed and corruption that has caused such misery to the beautiful people of this country. So I say, “Hello Veronica, how can you help me?”

“Well, she wasn’t ringing to help me or apologize or tell the truth. Rather she was ringing to ask me for my personal details so she can confirm that I am in fact Aidan Killian. But that got me thinking, who am I? I mean am I Aidan Killian am I that sound Aidan Killian that noise “Aidan Killian,” “Aidan Killian,” “Aidan Killian” – is that me? Or am I the name written down; those twelve letters. A. I. D. A. N.  K. I. L. L. I. A. N. – is that me? What about my middle name Jon? Am I named Jon Killian? A. J. Killian? -My name in capital letters? -Or little letters? -Or is there a difference? -And if there is why didn’t we learn that shit in school? I mean, am I the legal entity that was set up on my behalf by the state by my parents signing my birth certificate (without my consent I might add) -Am I even my parents’ son? A descendent of my ancestors goes back to the beginning of the human race which means that all of us are like brothers and sisters? Or am I just me here this man Human Being flesh and blood with a soul that answers only to God? I mean Jesus said, “Know thyself.” Who am I?

“Sorry Veronica, I’m going to have to get back to you.”

“Look, Aidan, this is a serious matter we need your details for security purposes and may I remind you this call is being monitored for training and quality purposes. This is an important matter, do you understand?”

“Well do I understand? Understand, according to Black’s Law Dictionary (which is the dictionary that all the courts and banks use, the sneaky scumbags) means “Stand Under.” So if the question is do I stand under Veronica from the Bank of Ireland, the answer is no. I don’t stand under Veronica or any person at any bank. I don’t stand under any person in this world. The only person I stand under is my creator – or possibly my girlfriend, if that’s what it takes… Well I cannot say that to Veronica. She’d think I’m crazy and God forbid some person who’s working at a bank thinks that I’m crazy, so I speak in her language; the language that I used to use when I worked at a bank:

“Hello Veronica. Of course I’m willing to comply with all of your procedures, however, I have some of my own procedures that must proceed your procedures that I’m authorized to carry out by myself. Now it’s my policy here to record all incoming and all outgoing calls for my own personal amusement. Do you understand? Good. I’m going to ask you a few central security questions Veronica, as soon as you answer these questions, I’ll answer whatever you like. But just before I ask those questions, can you please hold? … Hello Veronica I’m back I hope you enjoyed the tune, I know I did. I chose it because it represents beauty, love and nature; everything that is important in this world but let’s get back to those procedures, shall we? Now as I said as soon as you answer these questions I’ll answer whatever you like: What is your second name, what is your date of birth and what are you wearing?”

“I’m not answering those questions!”

“Well I’m a busy man, Veronica. I need to go and write a joke. So why don’t you give me your home number and we can continue this call later on at my convenience.”

“I don’t want strangers ringing me at my private number.”

“Well you know what Veronica, you’re right. So don’t ring me ever again.”



As Performed by Josie the OutLaw

“If you work in Law enforcement, I have a very important question for you, one which soon may become a matter of life or death. I’m sure some people become police officers just so they can boss other people around. But I’m going to assume here that you mean well, and that you want to be one of the good guys. In which case, my questions is this: Is there anything the politicians could enact into Law that you wouldn’t enforce? Is there any order that you would refuse to carry out, or will you do absolutely anything your bosses tell you to? In the US police have already obeyed orders to fine or arrest people for a wide variety of harmless activities, such as dancing at the Jefferson memorial, or having a vegetable garden in their front yard. Police have even gone so far as to execute violent paramilitary raids on food co-ops and organic farms. For decades, police have been carrying out armed home invasions, forced property confiscations, and other acts of violence against people who aren’t hurting anyone, but who engaged in behaviors or habits which Lawmakers have arbitrarily declared to be illegal. You may be comfortable in assuming that you’ll never receive an order to do something truly immoral, but the fact is that every order you receive you have a choice between obeying without question, or relying on your conscience. No doubt there were cops a few years ago who never expected to be ordered to disarm innocent people, to do door-to-door home searches without warrant or probable cause, or to detain and interrogate people for merely driving down a road. Yet police have since been ordered to do all of these things, and almost without exception they obeyed. So it’s not unreasonable to ask: Is there any point at which you will draw a line and say, “No. That I will not do.” And if you won’t draw such a line anywhere – if you will do absolutely anything you political masters tell you to – how are you any different from the enforcers of Soviet Russia, Red China, or Nazi Germany? You may be tempted to say, “I don’t make the Law, I just enforce it,” or to argue that if some legislature, court or some authority above you says its okay, then it must be. But keep in mind that this is exactly what the thugs of every tyrannical regime in history said to justify their actions, and how do we remember those people now? As courageous noble Law enforcers? No. Unless you want posterity remembering you as a heartless, mindless pawn of oppression, then you better decide and decide now, where you will draw that line.

“Unfortunately there is little indication that most cops have any line at all. The incidents of police officers refusing to inflict injustice upon the people, are extremely rare. Even when cops say they personally oppose certain Laws, such as marijuana prohibition, nearly all of them continue to violently enforce these Laws against nonviolent people. In other words, they recognize these Laws and counterproductive and unjust, but they choose to enforce them anyway. For the most part, American cops seem completely incapable of disobeying immoral orders, and instead do what the enforcers of every other authoritarian empire have done, inflicting harm on innocent people whenever and however those in power tell them to, while accepting no personal responsibility for their actions. I hope you are better than that.

“Keep in mind, there are a lot of decent Americans who do have the integrity and courage to draw a line in the sand; a point at which they will disobey and resist violations of their rights by those in power. It may be that they refuse to be disarmed. It may be they refuse to cooperate with warrantless searches, or refuse to keep funding a government they view as destructive and unjust. Whether you agree with them doesn’t particularly matter. What does matter is whether in the end you are willing, if and when you are ordered to do so, to violently assault the dissenters for their disobedience. When they draw their line in the sand and stand their ground, and your supervisors tell you to use whatever level of violence is necessary to get submission and compliance from the resisters, would you obey? If it came right down to it, would you kill American citizens for disobeying politicians?

“Now, if someone is actually harming someone else, of course you have the right to use whatever force necessary to stop the attacker and protect the innocent. But that would be the case even if you had no badge and no uniform. But when you try to arrest someone who hasn’t threatened or harmed anyone else, but has only disobeyed some arbitrary regulation, then you are the one initiating force – you are the one starting a fight – you are the bad guy.

“Now remember, the American Revolution was people forcibly resisting gun confiscation, warrantless searches, what they viewed as unfair taxation, and a number of other oppressions all in the name of Law all carried out by Law enforcers. If you had lived back then, would you be among the rebel colonists – the ones who refused to be disarmed, refused to pay taxes, and resisted warrantless detainment and searches? Would you have sided with the signers of the Declaration of Independence, or would you have been among the Red Coats – the Law enforcers – assaulting, caging or killing any colonist with the gall to disobey the king? And which side are you on today?

“Of course the message you’ll get from your superiors, the politicians and your fellow officers is that its not your place to decide which Laws to enforce, and as long as you faithfully follow orders, that you can’t be held personally responsible for doing what you’re told. But that is a lie – a horribly dangerous lie. At the Nuremberg trails it was established that the excuse used by the Nazi Law enforcers that they weren’t to blame and shouldn’t be punished because they were just doing as they were told, did not relieve them of personal responsibility for their actions. And make no mistake, if you choose to blindly obey unjust commands and one day your intended victims decide to fight back, saying that you’re just doing your job will not make you bullet proof. It may be your own life you save by deciding now at what point you will choose to be a moral, responsible Human Being instead of just an obedient pawn of those in power.

“Ultimately only you can answer the question of where you will draw that line. But really, the only moral, rational answer is this: if something would be wrong for you to do without a badge, then you shouldn’t do it with one either. The idea that uniforms and legislation can give you special rights is both false and horribly dangerous. Nearly every large-scale injustice in history was committed by people who wrongly imagined that their position of authority made it okay for them to do things that other people have no right to do. Like everyone else, you have the right to stop attackers, and protect the innocent, and when you do that you are the hero. But you have no right to be the attacker, even if its your job, and even if the aggression is called, “Law.” Always in every situation, you and you alone are responsible for what you do. Wearing a badge and a uniform and doing whatever you’re told does not make you brave and noble or deserving of any respect. “Just following orders,” is a coward’s excuse. If your job requires you to assault or cage people who haven’t threatened or harmed anyone, then quit. Being an actual protector – doing the right thing no matter what anyone else says even if it means disobeying orders and breaking the Law – that takes courage and integrity. That makes you a hero. So do you have enough of a spine to draw that line? Decide now before your failure to think for yourself results in damage that cannot be undone.”


Howard Zinn contends in his 1970 Speech, Civil Disobedience:

“I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail and the wrong people are out of jail, that the wrong people are in power and the wrong people are out of power, that the wealth is distributed in this country and the world in such a way as not simply to require small reform but to require a drastic reallocation of wealth. I start from the supposition that we don’t have to say too much about this because ail we have to do is think about the state of the world today and realize that things are all upside down.
“If you don’t think, if you just listen to TV and read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad, or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy.
“And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. We recognize this for Nazi Germany. We know that the problem there was obedience, that the people obeyed Hitler. People obeyed; that was wrong. They should have challenged, and they should have resisted; and if we were only there, we would have showed them. Even in Stalin’s Russia we can understand that; people are obedient, all these herd-like people.
“Remember those bad old days when people were exploited by feudalism? Everything was terrible in the Middle Ages—but now we have Western civilization, the rule of Law. The rule of Law has regularized and maximized the injustice that existed before the rule of Law, that is what the rule of Law has done.
“When in all the nations of the world the rule of Law is the darling of the leaders and the plague of the people, we ought to begin to recognize this. We have to transcend these national boundaries in our thinking. Nixon and [Leonid] Brezhnev have much more in common with one another than we have with Nixon, J. Edgar Hoover has far more in common with the head of the Soviet secret police than he has with us. It’s the international dedication to Law and order that binds the leaders of all countries in a comradely bond. That’s why we are always surprised when they get together—they smile, they shake hands, they smoke cigars, they really like one another no matter what they say.
“What we are trying to do, I assume, is really to get back to the principles and aims and spirit of the Declaration of Independence. This spirit is resistance to illegitimate authority and to forces that deprive people of their life and liberty and right to pursue happiness, and therefore under these conditions, it urges the right to alter or abolish their current form of government—and the stress had been on abolish. But to establish the principles of the Declaration of Independence, we are going to need to go outside the Law, to stop obeying the Laws that demand killing or that allocate wealth the way it has been done, or that put people in jail for petty technical offenses and keep other people out of jail for enormous crimes. My hope is that this kind of spirit will take place not just in this country but in other countries because they all need it. People in all countries need the spirit of disobedience to the state, which is not a metaphysical thing but a thing of force and wealth. And we need a kind of declaration of interdependence among people in all countries of the world who are striving for the same thing.”



 When asked what the title of his 1988 book Manufacturing Consent signified, author and professor Noam Chomsky explained the nature of this borrowed term, its roots embedded the birth of the Public Relations industry:

“The title, Manufacturing Consent is actually borrowed from a book by Walter Lipman written back around 1921, in which he described what he called the Manufacture of Consent as a revolution in the practice of democracy. What it amounts to is a technique of control. He said this was useful and necessary because the common interests – the general concern of all people – elude the public. The public just isn’t up to dealing with them. And they have to  the domain of what he called a Specialized Class. Notice that’s the opposite of the standard view about democracy. There’s a version of this expression by the highly respected moralist and theologian Reinhold Neebor who was very influential on contemporary policy makers, his view was that rationality belongs to the cool observer, but because of the stupidity of the average man, he follows not reason but faith. And this naive faith requires necessary illusion.”

27 years after the publication of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley confirmed this notion of governing by consent:

“To start with I think this kind of dictatorship of the future will be very unlike the dictatorships which we’ve been familiar with in the immediate past. Take another book prophesying the future which was a very remarkable book – George Orwell’s 1984 – where this book was written at the height of the Stalinist regime and just after the Hitler regime, and there he foresaw a dictatorship using entirely the methods of terror – the methods of physical violence. I think what is going to happen in the future is the dictators will find as the old saying goes, that you can do everything with bayonets except sit on them. That if you want to preserve your power indefinitely you have to get the consent of the ruled and this they will do partly by drugs (as I foresaw in Brave New World), partly by these new techniques of propaganda. They will do it by bypassing the rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious and his deeper emotions and his physiology even, and so making him actually love his slavery. I think this is the danger that actually people may be in some ways happy under the new regime.”

For harsh, truthful, specific insight on what these necessary illusions entail, comedian Doug Stanhope repeatedly hits the nail squarely on the head:

“The Pledge of Allegiance is in the Supreme Court. That’s another trick argument. “Under God should be in the Pledge of Allegiance.” – “No it shouldn’t.”  We don’t need a Pledge of Allegiance, say that. Why do you need that brainwashing cult shit? If you have a good product, kids will find out on their own – you don’t need to advertise. 12 years of forced advertising. You’ve done drugs at some point, right? Did you have a good time? Did you ever see them advertised? They didn’t need to. If you’ve got a good product, people come around. You don’t need that shit. “Well you do have to have ‘under God’ in there because the founding fathers based this country on the principals of Christianity.” If you want to worry about the Pledge of Allegiance, don’t worry about the ‘under God,’ part, worry about, the ‘Liberty and Justice for All.’ The dictionary definition of Liberty is, ‘Freedom from Government Restriction and Control.” Not only do we not have liberty, but who has less liberty than the children you make say this? That’s the irony. They get the least liberty of anyone. They can’t do shit: they can’t drink, they can’t smoke, they can’t drive, they can’t vote, they can’t work, they can’t fuck for God sakes and you wonder why your teenager is such an asshole. You wonder why he is sitting in the Taco Bell parking lot after the Friday night high school football game and he’s keying cars and he’s smearing dog shit on your door handles for no particular reason, it’s because he’s bored out of his tit. You won’t let him do anything else. On the news you see a ten year old kid in a third world country; he’s got an AK-47 and a death stare looking right into the camera; that kid’s not spray painting overpasses on Saturday night. He’s got shit to do. He’s got a whole agenda. So if you want to fix the Pledge of Allegiance, put a disclaimer at the end: ‘…with liberty and justice for all – must be 18, void where prohibited, some restrictions may apply, not available in all states.’

“How do you pledge allegiance to a Government? How do you do that? All America is, is a government. There is no such thing as, ‘we’re Americans.’ That’s just trivial bullshit to get you rooting for the home team. You’re not an American, you’re a guy, or a chick – you’re a person. You’re an individual. That’s it. Until the Mongols come over the hills swinging machetes trying to take our fire-hazard, underground comedy club away from us, then we all buddy up as one. But those days are over. There’s no one trying to take America over. We weren’t on the verge of speaking Iraqi.

“If you’re going to pledge blind allegiance and call yourself an American for a government that fucks you on a regular basis, democracy is the worst kind. I’m sorry but it is. ‘We get to pick our leaders.’ Well, what if I don’t want a leader? Where does that vote go? I do good on my own. I don’t want to be led. Is that freedom? American Idol was the number one show for the last two years; those are the people picking your leaders, with less insight than they put into whether Rubin’s daughter should win an award. Would you call yourself a Christian if they had a new Jesus every four years?”

Regarding the concept of “freedom,” Stahnope’s 2004 analysis is the most articulate and lucid of anyone who has spoken of it in recent history. While performing his Deadbeat Hero tour, Stanhope said of America:

“Its not a Free Country. You’re born free except for Laws of nature. If you drink you get drunk that’s a Law. If you get old you die, that’s a Law too. If you sit on a tack you will bleed from the ass. These are the only Laws that you’re born with and any government just fucks you out of that type of Freedom. If you really think you’re free tonight – you – officer bob, you’re a free man, you live in a Free Country. You go upstairs, and take your beer you risked your life for and sit on the hood of your Mazda truck in the parking lot and drink your beer, and see how long it is before actual veteran cops come by and pound on you with trungeons on the kidneys. “Why can’t I do it? I’m just having a beer.” “I don’t know, it’s the Law though. You don’t fuck around.”

“You can’t drive down the street without a seat belt on. Why not? I don’t know. You’ve gotta put on a helmet. You can’t sit in your own back yard naked. Your own filthy dirty flesh that you’re born with. You know that body you carry around. Filthy. You can’t sit out there naked. Why not? That’s just the way it is.


“You’re not free. You’re not free in the least. You need a diploma in this country to cut hair. Free? you need to keep your tray in the upright and locked position during takeoff. That’s not just a hack premise, it’s a fucking felony.

“They say if you give a man a fish, he’ll eat for a day, but if you teach a man to fish then he’s got to get a fishing license but he doesn’t have any money so he has to get a job and he has to get into the Social Security System and pay taxes and now you’re going to audit the poor sucker because he’s not really good with math. They pull the IRS up to your house, they’ll take all your shit and that all goes up for auction with the burden of proof on you because you were just worried about eating a fish. And you couldn’t even cook the fish because you needed a permit for an open flame. And then the health department is going to start asking you a lot of questions about where you’re going to dump the scales and the guts, and “this is not a sanitary environment.” And ladies and gentlemen, if you get sick of it all, at the end of the day it’s not even legal to kill yourself in this country.

“You were born free, you got fucked out of half of it and you wave a flag celebrating. The only true freedom that you find is when you realize and come to terms with the fact that you are completely and unapologetically fucked. And then you are free to float around the system. ”


In a world of legal crimes perpetuated by agents of a system that will never police itself, those who have put themselves on the line to defend the Constitution and return to the rule of Law are consistently persecuted for failing to cooperate with a Corporate government. Common Law rights advocate Dean Clifford, arrested at his own seminar in front of crowds of suspicious citizens. Meanwhile, a simple mountain man named Ernie Wayne Tertelgte fights for his own common Law rights in Bozeman, Montana. 52 year old Ernie Wayne Tertelgte was arrested in September of 2013 and accused of fishing without a license and resisting arrest – their so-called “charges” don’t tell a very complete story of what actually happened, however. And while news and media outlets undermine Ernie’s exemplary courage, intelligence and tact, the online community reacted immediately to the Youtube videos of Ernie taking on Judge Wanda Drusch in the Three Forks Justice Court. Recently in January of 2014, Ernie recorded and submitted a verbal Affidavit of the events surrounding the petty technical offenses charged against him. Here is the abridged transcript of said Affidavit, as was aired on 5 May 2014 by the Outer Limits:


“Good afternoon. My name is Ernie Wayne Tertelgte, and I am the natural living man. Many of you know that I’ve had a large battle going with the Montana Court system in Gallatin County of Boseman Montana over the all-capitalized Corporate fiction that would appear to be my name, spelled in all caps which would then cause me to be property. You’ve heard me speak to the fact that I am not said property, that I am the living dirt, the living water, and the living air which all three have a voice. At the minute that voice is me. It’s also you.

“Do you believe in the Golden Rule of Law, which states that no one is above the Law? In Montana our State Law here which I have right here for a direct reference, mandates that every official, regardless of capacity, that holds any office, first must recite an oath to uphold and defend  the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Montana, and that upon demand any official must produce that evidence of that oath, immediately. It should be memorized. That official as far as Montana is concerned it totally required to produce it just the instant you ask for it. If they can do it by memory, that would be the better for them. The facts of the matter are that none of them have done this. In Montana State Law, it is found in CF 37-61-207 Montana Code Annotated 2011.

“As to regards to my case I filed this request on the 6th of September of 2013 looking to build the discovery packet that would give me all the information necessary to navigate this banking mess, that they want you to think is a court action. It is a simple banking mess. Not one single actor – not a banker that wants you to think they’re a judge, not a deputy, not the sheriff – all of them, have utterly failed to observe and uphold the very oath that they took to claim the office that they’re claiming. There has not been brought to my hand one shred of evidence that any of them are actual. That causes them to become imposters.

“I began the requirement on this on the sixth of September, Two-Thousand-Thirteen and I gave them thirty days in this required response. In other words I didn’t say, “If you’d like,” or, “At your leisure.” I said you’ve got thirty days and you will produce it.

“Now one thing I’d like to say here. There are some of the deputies that I have come to know throughout this mess here that I have great respect for and I have seen in their faces that they have developed a respect for me. When this first kicked off in early September and I was first arrested and brought in, my manner of speech caused some of them to think that I was a mental case. However as they watched this grow and they watched the impact that all of you have brought to this – Eight-Million, Six-Hundred-Thousand, Four-Hundred hits – has opened their eyes. I have not treated the deputies badly. I have offered to shake their hands. I have looked them in the eyes. I have never called them names. I treated them with respect first. And so it is the to deputies, the working-class men and women that I extend this hand of fellowship to and I say if you’re not aware of this, then because of the Latin phrase “Ignorancia Juris Non Excusat” which means “Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse,” that being a double edged sword, verbally that runs both ways, you’d better dig them oaths out.

“Likewise it was required of them that they produce the evidence of a bond. Now I happen to know from research that it’s an insurance blanket bond. Nevertheless the word says, “Bond.” Where’s the daggum evidence? All of them likewise to the all-caps person, has utterly failed to produce any evidence of anything. That makes them professional frauds; total impostors. So in that 30 days I got utter silence. You heard me tell Wanda Drusch and show her in my large book of information the precise location the number of pages that I had done due diligence on face to face, filed it through all three levels of the Law and justice center which is a pirate ship – it’s a criminal ship having three decks to it – it is totally signed sealed and delivered received all the way in, and you saw that Ms. Drusch had no comprehension of anything that I was speaking of which ought to tell you something about your own cases. They don’t bother to look into it. They don’t have a clue about what you may have filed. This keeps them deeper in their own fraudulent criminal standing. They having had 30 days to comply with state requirement, that window then closed on the sixth of October of 2013.

“[Now], 8 days shy of going to trial on January 27th 2014, total silence is what I’ve had. I have no communiqué form you guys. I have nothing to work with. I’m totally on my own, as are all of you. While you all hear my voice and see my face and my old trihorn hat and all, this is actually you. You’re living this nightmarish hell with corrupt bankers just the same as I. You get to live it every time you receive a bribe from the IRS that  you think is a tax refund. You get to live it every time a private pirate called a Highway Patrolman pulls you over on a British water way for vessel inspection. You think you’re driving down a free way or a state highway or a city street or you’re even parked in your own driveway. Well, my good friends and fellow Americans you’re on British soil and in British water and that’s why you’re under Admiralty Maritime Law. Because while its only me today, it ain’t gonna be much longer, maybe tomorrow, it’s gonna be you.


“Gallatin County, which has 75 deputies on its force, has felt the need to drag in deputies from Mar County, Park County and Sweet Grass County. The last trial you all watched me be arrested at where I stood for the memory of those who fought and died for the 1789 Constitution, well they had deputies form other counties in there. None of those deputies have produced any evidence of their offices either.

“I want to reiterate what I said in the get go. There are good people on the inside. There are honorable men and women, who when presented with the truth, will cease their pirating. I have to give them the chance.

“Look around you at the condition of the county, expand it to the condition of the state. Expand your horizons to the condition of America, the nation at large, look at the world then.

“Think about what it is you’re upholding. What you claim that you’re willing to lay your lives down in defense of? It’s a vampirical system and it’s drained the people of everything.

“How long do think this can go on before there’s a backlash? Truth will not be repressed or suppressed forever. Darkness will not forever hold back the light of day. And neither will the claims of Admiralty Maritime Law hold back the word in Genesis 1, Verse 6, The dry land, the dirt, the soil, the good people of the Earth. Well, the water claims, the Laws of the sea, and the claims of the British Accredited Registry known as the BAR (Mr. Patrick C. Riley you traitor) won’t be able to hold the people back. Their time is a comin’.

“My goal in all of this has been to cause the people to talk, everyone who had an ear and a voice to listen, and to being communication. And as I said before, eight and a half million people is pretty good evidence. So as I have spoken these words to your heart today, remember that while today its me, tomorrow its you. Are you going to be the one in the chains headed for the British Gallows? Think about these things.

“All of you that have listened to this that are good people, I love you. I stand for the people of the United States and the people of the world at large who are under severe persecution by the criminal banking cabal. Thank you to those who have helped me to put this little blip out today. God willing as time permits, perhaps you’ll hear more from me. And with that, I’m going to let you go.”


They say that suicide is illegal because it is against the Law to destroy government property. Sadly, this statement is not far from the truth. Recently stepping out of obscurity, lifelong reporter Jordan Maxwell spells out just a few of the most obvious smoking guns associated with the modern American Corporate system of Trust Law and how we have all become chattel property under said system.

“Your body is a Corporation. That’s why when you die, you are a corpse, because you are a Corporation. You are a Company. And as such, you may be good Company, you may be bad Company, but you’re a Company nonetheless. By Law, it’s called international Maritime Admiralty Law which is the Law of money, Corporations and the sea. Therefore anything you do is Business. It may not be my Business, it may be your Business, but it’s a business by Law. Therefore anything you do (which is your Business) must have a License. So if you’re going to get married that means one Corporation is going to do Business with another Corporation, so you must have a marriage License. Anything you do, you need to get a Permit or a License.

“And in America you have something called the Statue of Liberty. Notice that it’s not called the Statue of Freedom.  Liberty is what a sailor gets when he gets off a ship in the Navy. When a naval vessel pulls into port, sailors ask permission from the Captain to go onto land. When (and if) the sailors get permission to do this, they call it Liberty – not Freedom. In America you have no Freedom. You have Liberty. Liberty means you ask permission, you get a Permit and you have a license. A License is simply an agreement, and a permit to do something which without that License is unLawful. So therefore you can’t get married without License, because you’re a Business and your spouse is a Business. And what the two of you do is none of my business.

“But the point you need to understand is that you are a Corporation. Your body is being bought and sold on the New York Stock Exchange every day and you have no idea in the world how the world really works. So people talk about having to go to Court and they talk about how the government does this and the government did that, and they get scared to death because they’ve got to go to Court, but why do people go to Court? -Because you play basketball on a Court. You play tennis on a Court. And the reason why you go to Court? It’s a game. It’s like tennis. And how do you play tennis? You play with a racket. So when you go into a basketball game to play on the court the whole idea is you have two teams. One side is a team of Lawyers, and the other is a team of Lawyers. The whole idea is to put the ball in the other guy’s court. And you have a judge who is the referee. You always have a referee, even in a baseball game. You’ve got the referee who makes the decision as to what really happened. I don’t care what really happened. And he decides what happened.  So whatever he says happened, that’s what happened.

“Then the next thing you need to understand is that there is a fence and a gate in the courtroom, and people sit out there and the judge sits inside. Why is there a fence and a gate? Because the gate represents a Water Gate like the Panama Canal. So therefore when you’re called up and you put your hand on the gate, you are opening up the floodgate under Maritime Admiralty Law.

“Happily, Americans don’t know about any of this. If you walk into the court and call your name and you open up the Water Gate, you are now in Hot Water, and somebody is going to have to Bail you out. Banks and Money run the world. So the judge rules from a bench. Look up the word Bench. Bench is a Bank in Latin. And the judge sits higher up looking down on you, but you’re looking up to the Bank.

“When a ship pulls into a harbor, and let’s say it has 800 million dollars of Toyotas on it, it has 800 million dollars of business on board when it comes in on water. So when the ship comes in, we say “it parts at the dock.” This ship of Toyotas amounts to 800 million dollars worth of Banking on a single vessel. Remember that Banking is synonymous with Maritime Admiralty, which is the Law of the Sea. So therefore if you’re going to be doing any business, you need to be part of this Corporation. In the World-Corporation, you are a Citizen on board a Ship. So you have Citizenship, Sportsmanship, Scholarship, Dealership, and Courtship. And any time you order something from a big company they’re going to “Ship” it to you.

“Where a ship sits in the harbor is called Berth. So we say, “The ship is sitting in her berth.” We say, “her” because all ships are she under International Law; they’re all female, just like in Jurassic Park. Because she Delivers the Product. The man on the other hand, Manufactures. So when you have been Manufactured, and she (your mother) Delivers the Product, you are a Product of two Corporations. Your mother was a Corporation and your father was a Corporation. Therefore you are the joint new product of two Corporations. In a similar way, if Ford Motor company gets together with Suzuki, that’s fine as long as they get a License because it’s Business. And regardless of what those two Companies produce, the one who gave them the License is the boss, because before they were Licensed, they couldn’t do it at all. So if the Corporation gives you permission to create a new product, that’s all fine and dandy, but the Product belongs to them, not you.

“So understand that not only is the ship female and sitting in her Berth, but any item taken off of that ship must have its own Certificate of Manifest. And each individual Toyota has to be represented: Four doors? Two doors? Air conditioning? What color is it? How heavy is it? And all of the paper work has to be correct for each item.

“So when you’re born the same events unfold, only it’s called a Birth Certificate: How much does it weigh? What race is it? Does it have two eyes? What color is it? -Because these are all vital signs for a Product. You are a Human Resource. You’re going to be bought and sold by the international banks of New York and London. Your body is a Security of the New York Stock Exchange.

“Next, the words you use on the street don’t work in a Court. You’d better know what you’re talking about when going before a judge. You’d better use the correct term. Because if you use the wrong term thinking they’ll understand, now you’re going to jail because you used the wrong word. The Styles Manual from the British and American Printing Office translates the words for use in International Court.

“A group of people got together back in 1871 and they formed a Corporation after the Civil War they called The United States Corporation, and it was a Municipal Corporation. And it was stipulated that anyone who worked for The Corporation was a member of the Corporation. Today if you are a US Citizen, when you walk into a bank or any place before some authority and they ask you, “Are you a US Citizen,” and you say, “Yes,” What you think they are asking you, is, “Are you Lawfully in American to do business, or are you an A-Lien?” Any good attorney will tell you that if you say you are a US citizen that means you are an employee of a foreign Corporation under Maritime Law and therefore your boss is in Washington D.C. and you work for him.

“Instead of the Law of the Land, the President has Policy, which is why we have Police. Police back up the Policy that the Politicians and Corporate CEOs dictate. So the masters of The Corporation make the Policy, and Police enforce it.”



So Too Will Your Children Be…If You Consent To It

Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.  By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.  Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.  They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the Law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.  Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.  They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.  After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.  This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”  Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.  The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy Corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Whenever your dealing with Corporations or Governments, you must keep in mind that they’re not using the same language as you are. They’re not speaking English. They’re using Legalese.

How do you define “Person?” As a Human Being regarded as an individual? The Law definitions that Banks, Governments and Corporations use define it much differently. If we look at Black’s Law Dictionary, Person means individual or inCorporated group having certain legal rights and responsibilities Not a Human Being as an individual, but as an individual Corporation.

Comparing artificial person against Natural Person, we find that an Artificial Person is defined as A legal entity. Not a Human Being.

Natural Person: A Human Being that has the capacity for rights and duties.

The heart of the grand deception is keeping us mired in the world of money, while keeping from us all the fact that nearly every country operates with the Artificial and Natural Persons merged together as one. That means Human Beings are given the rights of Corporations (i.e. no human rights) while Artificial Corporate Persons are given the rights and privileges of Natural Persons more and more so. And the ones aware of this are profiting from it in a multitude of ways. We as sovereign Human Beings are a higher life form that a Corporation. In order for them to control us they’ve had to make great use of parody.

Robert Menard has firsthand knowledge of exactly how we have become chattel property without our even knowing it:

“What I uncovered was that when a person is registered from birth, it is from that point in time that a Legal Person is being created and associated with them. It’s at that point when you join a club, and when you join this club you’re given a membership card. The card itself would be your person as opposed to the Human Being who is the member of the club.

“Elizabeth Amy Lane came into my life about four and a half years ago. Two days after the birth of Elizabeth, ministry workers came and removed her without investigation or assessment. They claimed she only had one care giver. We said you’re wrong and we’re going to meet you in court. They told us that if we did that, she would spend the first five years of her life going from foster home to foster home to foster home. They shut me up in and court cost me my baby. For those of you who don’t know me, shutting me up even for a moment is a bit of a trick.

“So I sat down with Black’s Law Dictionary on one side Bouvier’s on the other, I had an old English dictionary, I looked up every single word in there. This took me three entire days. Nothing but toast and tea and a couple of tokes. And then, near the end of the third day, I finally saw it!

“Have you ever seen those laser pictures, you see nothing until you focus past the page and then a 3D picture pops into your head? Have you seen those? This is exactly what I saw when I did my Statute deconstruction. I suddenly saw what they’re doing. I saw finally their clever little trick.

“Here it is: You are not obliged to register your children. If you do it is at that point that you are creating a Legal entity or a “Person.” By doing so you are associating this Person with your offspring. By doing so you are abandoning ownership or title to that Person, and the government is seizing claim to said Person under the Laws of Maritime Salvage. Therefore the Person becomes their chattel property that they use as collateral to float bonds for loans.”


John Harris picks up where Menard left off:

“You are a man or a woman; you have a Person. My name is John Harris, or Jon. I exist naturally Okay? I’m here. I’m real. I was created by divine whatever you want to call it. I’m subject to Common Law Jurisdiction. I must never harm another, or cause another any form of loss. I’m free and unlimited in ability to contract and settle debt in a private capacity and under Commercial Law. I can basically do what I please as long as I abide by these principals. My Person that is attached to me is Mr. J Harris who is a fictional entity created by the government. He is subject to civil policy jurisdiction must fulfill all duties given to him and governed by Corporate policy (tax etc.) and Statutes.

“How was the Artificial Person created? When you were born your mother and father submitted a Birth Certificate Registration Application form in the formulation of any limited company or Corporation there is always a certificate of registration to create its legal personality. Your fictional person, known by Mr. or Mrs. is created by the same means. When you submit you are bending to another’s will. When you register you are handing over title ownership of what ever you are registering, to whom ever you are registering it to. You actually physically hand this over, and in doing this you acknowledge the transferring of that authority. When you apply it actually means you are begging, and when you beg its assumed you know what you’re begging for, and that you know what you’ll give up. That’s what this means. Most of the time you actually volunteer an application. You’re not made to do it. Do they make you get a Credit Card? No, but you submit an application for it.

“The whole world runs on submitting applications for this or submitting applications for that. You get a certified copy. You do not get the original, which goes somewhere else. The name of the Person that is being created appears in CAPITALIZED SURNAME. The surnames are capitals. This is a fiction. They need another fiction to do this though, who is known as the Informant. You actually inform on your own children. Did you know that? And your qualification is: You’re one of their parents. And it’s all capitalized. Look at your Birth Certificate. At the bottom [of the document] there is a declaration. Declaration is in Common Law, [signifying] a sworn oath of a man or a woman. And there is a reason that is on the bottom. -Because without that man or woman being present, the fictitious mother or father isn’t present. The Person is attached to the Human Being, but to do this, they need the Human Being to be there. That’s why there is a Declaration at the bottom. It says it quite simply you have to be present to represent the person needed to create the new Person’s legal personality. Then you register it to a Corporation.”

The state declares that your children must be registered to them, and threaten that you’ll be liable for prosecution if you fail to comply. So what can you do? Is there any way to avoid registering your biological property? Here is an example of a document one could write up in the event that they do not want to register their children to the state, and seek to claim their rights through administrative declaration:

Declaration of Denial of Consent to register Children
strictly private and confidential

We the authorized representatives for the legal persons [MOM] and [DAD] do hereby declare that the following is a verified plain statement of the facts as we perceive them.

Let it be known by all concerned and interested and affected parties that:

1. We have been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over our children by the creator of the Universe

2. We have accepted irrevocable power of attorney over our children’s’ well being and property until the 18th anniversary of their birth.

3. For and on behalf of our children we have settled their entire legal estate into a private trust which is administer for their maximum benefit

4. The property settled into said private trust includes without limitation, any and all information pertaining to the existence of our children, strictly precluding the disclosure of the details of their birth to any party whatsoever.

5. Any and all disclosures of information pertaining to the existence of our children, would represent a breech of the aforementioned private trust and all those parties responsible for said breeches will be liable for charges of $30,000 or function currency.

6. We do not recognize or consent to any perceived obligation whether Statutory or otherwise to register the birth of our children under any circumstances whatsoever.

7. As trustees of the aforementioned private trust, we affirm jointly and without division that we refuse to grant our consent and/or authorization to the registrar, or any other individual organization or entity
to register information pertaining to the birth of our children under any circumstances whatsoever.

What would you imagine would happen after sending that letter in? You’ll likely get threats, pleas, and all manner of excuses, depending on how long you keep the letter writing campaign up, urging you to make an urgent appointment in the near future under “Penalty of Law.” Debt collectors utilize this same lexicon.

If and when they do send you threatening follow-up documents, simply write them another letter outlining your conditions of acceptance. Ask them to prove that there is a benefit to registering, and ask them to prove that you have consented to this registration. Declare that you will accept their terms only if they can provide evidence to support these claims (which of course they cannot).


Robert Pagé is a Canadian Freeman and the feature personality of the Ben Stewart documentary Ungrip. Robert outlines his thoughts on the Consent of the Governed:

“I was raised to respect authority, do as they say, and I think most people are brought up that way. But I later learned that authority is based 100% on our consent to being governed. There is a Supreme Court ruling that says that the Consent of the Governed is a foundational principal of Democracy. But what is Consent? Does that imply you have a choice as to whether you are going to agree to that or not? I would suggest that the answer is yes. So we all have free will choice to Consent to being governed. When we do that, we’ve given them permission to use their authority over us. So when we used our free will to apply for or register something, we gave them permission to create a Corporation to interact between the Man and the System. And it’s that Corporation that the system acts upon but because we don’t know who we are. We think or we assume that that is us.

“So when you take a look at your Credit Card or Drivers License tour Birth Certificate, a lot of people including myself thought that that is actually me. But that’s not true. So when the courts are acting upon it, all they can really act upon is a CORPORATION, and the only reason they can act upon the Man is because we agree to be the representative of that CORPORATION, and bind yourself to the terms and conditions of that agreement. But we can say ‘no’ at any time.”


“This is what they don’t want you to know,” contends Robert Menard. “You can actually just say ‘no’ to them.”

“They got everyone to become a government employee. This way, where normally they would be our servants and we would be in charge of them they tricked us all into getting Social Insurance Numbers. These numbers identify us as a government employee, and we’re thus receiving “benefits,” as they call them. Therefore we are bound by the rules that bind all government employees.

“So they’ve tricked ups. We are a nation of people employed by the Government bound by the rules that the Government pens, but only because we are employed by them.

“Your Governments call the Social-Insurance-Number, an Employee-Identification-Number. The courts have ruled that payment into a pension plan is Prima Facie evidence of employee status. Only employees pay into a pension plan. They’ll tell you need this Social Insurance Number to work legally in your own country.”

“To put it into perspective, if someone tells you they are legally working in Wal-Mart, are they not then automatically working legally for Wal-Mart? Wal-Mart employees have rules and regulations they must follow. They can’t come into work and have alcohol on their breath. But who says that you can’t go into Wal-Mart after having a couple of beers? You don’t work there. This is why you have to pay income tax. The fact is your Social Insurance Number means we are all government agents, at least we have the capacity to be under this system.”

“If you go into a temporary job placement agency, they will set you up with a job, but you will have to pay them a portion of what you earn. Why? Because you were working as an agent for them. You  have to pay income tax to the federal government for a similar reason.”

“You are working as a Federal Agent under a contract for service, instead of a Freeman working under contract for hire.”

“When I hear you complaining about the government I don’t hear citizens complaining about their Lawful government, I hear employees bitching about their employer.”


To say no to the system, it is important to engage in a process where you prove beyond a doubt administratively, and without court (even though they’re threatening you with court) to repay alleged debts.

Simply write up a document explaining that liability for debt does not seem to exist. Ask them to prove that your previous taxes haven’t been spent on the illegal wars.  Such a document might be titled, “Declaration of Cancellation of Tax Registration,” declaring that there is no evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a Natural Human Being is a “Tax Payer.” As it turns out, the Orwellian doublespeak hits a big-time feedback loop here: Tax Payers turn out to be Citizens, and Citizens are thus Tax Payers. The only way to opt out of one is to refuse identification with either. This doesn’t mean you aren’t paying “your fair share” for services you expect from Government, because that’s not where your tax money goes (click here for a refresher on the American Income Tax system as espoused by IRS whistleblowers Joe Banister, Sherry Peel Jackson, et Al.).

They will presume you are a Tax Payer until you rebut their presumption, because they operate primarily under presumptions.  In Law, anything that goes without rebuttal stands. So simply rebut their presumptions and watch what begins to unfold.

The Birth Certificate creates a contract which creates joinder between the Human Being and the Corporate fiction, granting  jurisdiction over the Human Being in the form of all the Statutes currently enforced. You are a Human Being. Your JOHN DOE is simply the legal fiction created by the piece of paper known as your Birth Certificate. The ALL CAPS title is known by many names, including De Facto, Strawman, and Capitis-Diminutio-Maxima (Maximum Loss of Rights), but because we will be explaining Corporate Trust Law a bit later on, let us keep simply referring to the corporate fiction as the Legal Person. Therefore your signature on any Legal document confirms that you are representing that piece of paper as a human trustee, or Employee of the State. Signing Legal documents creates joinder between the natural being and the paper fiction.

But authorities are both clever and intimidating, and will coerce your signature onto a great number of documents, all of which revoke your Common Law rights under the status of a slave. Such signatures are known to be written under protest and duress. That is to say that you didn’t wish to sign the document, but were made to anyway. If you’re doing anything against your consent, you’re doing so under Protest and Duress. You can express this in your signature by writing the abbreviation “V.C.” prior to your signature; the Latin phrase Vi Coactus signifies this Duress, and essentially makes the document worthless. It is, however, very important you place the V.C. prior to your signature, not after, and write the two capital letters as large as you can.

Deborah Williams asks, “What does a signature mean?”

“I will tell you right now that when you sign something (no matter what “they” say), it means that you accept liability. And if you don’t read and agree to EVERYTHING you sign, you are making a big mistake. I am constantly being asked… “How do I sign my name? … AND maintain my rights?”

“We all know that before they let us go, they ALWAYS want us to sign something to keep us coming back. There are other points in the “legal” system where a “signature” is expected or required before the court can proceed as well.

“I have heard that adding “Under Duress”, or “All Rights Reserved” to a signature when signing a document will maintain our inherent human rights; and while this could work as well, the proper and Latin way to sign under duress is to add a “V.C.” before your name.

“Vi Coactus, abbreviated to V.C., is a Latin term. Wikipedia cites the definition of vi coactus as:
“constrained by force”. Used when forced to sign (“or else …”)

“Perhaps the most famous use of vi coactus when signing a document was that of Cornelius de Witt. Alexandre Dumas captured the event as follows:

“The Grand Pensionary bowed before the will of his fellow citizens; Cornelius de Witt, however, was more obstinate, and notwithstanding all the threats of death from the Orangist rabble, who besieged him in his house at Dort, he stoutly refused to sign the act by which the office of Stadtholder was restored. Moved by the tears and entreaties of his wife, he at last complied, only adding to his signature the two letters V. C. (Vi Coactus), notifying thereby that he only yielded to force.

“There is scant authoritative information regarding this term on the web. However, on the One Heaven Society of United Free States of Spirits website the following information is provided:

“The Bar want you to sign as surety. At key points in a Court case, the Bar members want you to sign certain documents. Why? Because your signature is like your vocalized consent – it can be legally interpreted as your agreement to be surety for an obligation and to perform as well as to waive other rights.

“Do you have to sign? No you don’t. But in many cases, the Bar has designed a system so that if you don’t it is interpreted as dishonor so that they can invoke their power of attorney powers to declare you delinquent, incompetent and send you to prison anyway.

“This is why you may have heard of people who refused to sign the papers when entering prison and yet were treated worse than most serious criminals, with complete apparent ignorance of their rights- why? because the system is designed at certain points where you MUST sign. So how do you overcome an unjust and unfair system that forces a man or woman to sign under duress, against their will and yet interprets such signatures as valid under Canon Law? The answer is making sure you signature follows a clear mark of duress.

“Before you sign anything under duress, in order not to be unfairly determined as in dishonor and incompetent, you may Lawfully initial in large letters the letters V.C. where you will sign, then sign your name after- always after.

“What V.C. stands for is Latin for Vi Coactus which means literally “under constraint”. This should normally be sufficient on any document which you are forced to sign to bear witness to the fact that it was done under duress.

“Now, at the earliest opportunity before the court or official, you can make it known that upon review of your signature it can be proven to have been forced under threat and coercion and so cannot be used as legally binding agreement.

“In some locations and in some prisons as this knowledge grows, it is possible that Law enforcement officials may start to reject such signatures, adding more threat and force on a person to sign without using V.C. It is your choice remembering that if you allow such criminal intimidation and torture to prevail and do sign without protest then the system can simply lie and state you made such a sign of your “own free will”.
“So if they tear up the paperwork and demand you do it again, stating that such a signature is unLawful then such claims are against the Laws of the Roman Cult Canon Law- the actual Law that underpins their own statutes and regulations. However, if after several attempts they still refuse, there is a second method equally valid- the use of ellipse.

“When the threat of intimidation or outright rejection of Lawful protest is too great, then a second and equally valid method of signing under protest is permitted, namely the use of three full stops placed first, followed by the signature so that the three dots are not obscured by the signature.

“This is called an ellipsis eg “…” and indicates that legally there was a form of words you wanted to state but were unable due to some event, in this case because of threat and coercion. Thus, at the earliest opportunity the ellipsis can be revealed and it can be stated that you intended to write V.C. but were prevented therefore nullifying any agreement. [1]

The Corporate Employees must get a man or woman to represent the Person before a contract can be formed.

When you get to court they will immediately ask you your name, and then they’ll ask you for your address. These are not innocent, small-talk questions to get the conversation started. When you give them your address and you agree to represent the name they call out, they now have joinder between you and the CORPORATION. Because there could be 100,000 JON DOEs in the world, they need the admission of name and the articulation of address to obtain joinder to prove who you are in their system. The moment you do that, the Human Being has said, “Yes, I’m the Person,” and thus agrees to represent the CORPORATION.

A Contact is an agreement between two or more Persons that creates or modifies an existing relationship. Statute is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as:

“A legislative rule of society given the rule of Law by the consent of the governed.”

Where in this definition does it say that Statute is Law? It is only given the force of Law, which means it will indeed apply to you if you decide to consent.  So what happens when you don’t agree? If you don’t Consent, it isn’t Law, because it can’t be given the force of Law.

Statutes are not Laws. Statutes are rules that has the force of Law within a structured society because somebody gave them that force. If we’re all equal. who can give these words the force of Law? -Only you can. You have decided to give those statutes the force of Law within your Societal structure. So what is a Society? Society is likewise defined as:

“A number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal.”

Your consent is required for any Statute to have the force of Law. Point out the word Act to any agent claiming authority over you and ask what it means. You don’t have to make a positive affirmation in order for them to achieve consent; your silence and inaction will raise the appearance of consent. Consent can be achieved when you do nothing, so don’t do nothing!

Just as Thomas Jefferson once remarked, “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”



A police officer’s duty under common Law of this land is to serve and protect every individual on this land. That is their duty, and they mustn’t delay rights or justice to any individual in this land. But though they’re bound to uphold the Common Law, they have a fiction attached to them just like you have a CORPORATION attached to you, only their fiction is called a Police Officer. The word “Officer” comes from the Corporate world, wherein the highest authority is the Chief Executive Officer

The Officer is meant to enforce Statutes, while the Human Being is meant to “Serve and Protect.” The trouble is that today the boys in blue don’t even know that there is a difference, let alone how distinguish, and some of them didn’t know the difference in the first place, because they’ve been trained wrongly. In the past decade, Police training manuals have been usurped, and are now supplied by FEMA and DHS, who teach that the first Terrorists were Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. -I’m not making this up.


So Officers will want to identify you to establish jurisdiction over you. Ask them if they want your Legal or Lawful name, and iterate that you don’t have a Legal one. Ask under what authority they’re acting. If they accuse you of “breaking the Law,” ask them what Law they’re talking about. If they point to an Act or Statute clarify that they’re not Law. Ask them if they are aware that gross negligence is equal to fraud? They don’t like that question one bit, because have a duty to understand and distinguish between Statute and Law but they haven’t been given the adequate training to do so. But they haven’t had to educated because none of the citizens know their most basic and fundamental rights. So the Police have been dealing with people who are essentially ignorant who don’t even distinguish between statute and Law for so long now, that now Police simply assume Statutes are Law. They’ll tell you you’ve broken the Law and that they’re going to give you a ticket, or that they need to see your ID and if you don’t show them your ID I’ll arrest you for obstruction of justice.  The fact is that until they see ID they have absolutely no evidence of the existence of a Person who is liable under this statute, and this they are well aware of.

This runaround of asking ID to write a ticket puts the cart before the horse. They’re saying, “I need to see your ID so I can give you a ticket, because if you don’t let me see it I can’t give you a ticket.” They have been told that if they don’t see ID, they can’t give ticket. They know this.


If they hand you a citation, ask them if it’s a Transaction of a Security Interest. If they don’t know, it clearly can’t be, as you cannot engage in a Transaction of a Security Interest in ignorance. Since it’s not, they won’t be generating any obligation over you to pay or perform and you don’t need to be talking to them.

If, on the other hand, they affirm that it is, they need your consent for that, and if you tell them you don’t consent to it they can’t impose it.” Just say no!

If they try enforcing Statutory restraints or obligations against you, ask them what evidence they have that they are dealing with a person that is subject to said act. Until you produce an ID, they have no such evidence.

So if you can learn to distinguish between a Law Enforcement Officer and a Peace Officer and hold them to their Peace Officer status, and refuse to act as a Law Enforcement Officer against you because they have nothing to enforce, they’re typically relieved that you’re not an ignorant citizen. More citizens should know their rights.

It is also important to remember that these Officers, are just Human Beings. If you remember this, they have to remember this too. They can respond to Love, Compassion and Truth just the same as Threats, Lies and Emotion. If you treat them with the dignity which all Human Beings are worthy of, they will respond accordingly.

Court, likewise, is a Corporate place of business where they will immediately ask you for your name, for the same reason that the Police Officer immediately asks you for state issued identification; to ascertain jurisdiction over you. The Courts will even presume to know who you are, identifying you as MR. JON DOE/MRS. JANE DOE. Mr./Mrs. are title identifiers for something with legal personality status. After all, you weren’t called Mr. or Mrs. by your parents. So if you reply yes, you’ve agreed to represent the Legal Person.

Not man nor woman can be acted upon by Statutes. A Human Being living soul cannot conform to paper contracts unless they agree to represent them. Statutes only apply to the fictional entity which is the legal personality i.e. MR. JON DOE in all caps or every title in this land is a fiction. The only basic principals that any people of any nation need to adhere to are those of natural Law which are mirrored in common Law; never harm or cause loss. The Golden Rule of nonviolation covers every eventuality without exception.

Common Law applies to a man or a woman – a living soul. Statute rules apply tot eh Person only or when the man or woman consent to represent the person. Consent can be given in inaction or action.  But out of fear, the majority have chosen silent, obedient consent. We are slaves in a system designed to milk us like cows. Money is a tool that we, the masses, are made to believe in and use, ultimately to serve the elite. It is essential for the elite that people stop bartering or working for themselves and using money as a means of exchange which then can be taxed back from them to transform them into slaves. Therefore it is essential that the workers believe in money to maintain the illusion that they have control over your life, fortune and freedom. Because it is your fear and their ability to take away from you something that you deem to be valuable: Money. Do we all believe money is valuable? We use it every day and believe these pieces of paper and coin have some worth, when in fact they do not. If you need a refresher from The Bankfather series, you’ll remember that we learned banks create money out of nothing and then lend it to us and collect interest on money that doesn’t’ exist.  The elite don’t need money because they have the ability to print it, but they do need us to believe that there is nothing else to use as a means of exchange in order to maintain their wealth.

The truth is that though we’ve chosen to act as such, we are not debtor slaves. We are the lifeblood of the entire system. We are the currency. Not money. Because without us this country grinds to a halt. Because the principal workforce of any machine or Corporation or company are slaves, and they must give us something to believe in so we will do that work and not question, and to make it valuable they’re going to stiff you to make believe to make you give over that worthless piece of paper to another Corporation, just so you believe its real.



Ask yourself this: What is the name of your society? Do you have a society? Believe it or not, all of the Statutes are the legislated rule of a particular society which had been given the force of Law, but that’s the Law Society. These are the rules for the Law Society. You’re not allowed to pen he statutes regulations or orders, only they can. If you go to court they claim that only they may use these documents complete understanding unless you’re a member of that society you cannot understand these words because societies have number of powers. They claim that only members of their society can understand this language. The Law Society has created a language deceptively similar to English, with the meanings of critical words altered away from the common usage. They’ve changed just a few words and thus created a completely new language. Some of these words have very different meanings:

MUST is synonymous with the word MAY.
When a Corporation says to you, “You must,” they’ve actually given you a choice because can’t force you, because they’re not allowed to because it’s not Law it’s only Policy.

SUMMONS is synonymous with INVITATION
When you get a Summons from a court of supposedly Law, you are actually being invited to a Corporate place of business to discuss how much money you’re going to give that Corporate place of business!

UNDERSTAND is synonymous with STAND UNDER
If I say to you do you understand and you say yes, that means you stand under me, which means you’ve given me authority over you. Their language is simple, but it is nevertheless a language the common people do not know how to speak.



The founding founders of the United States desired people to have life, liberty and property, along with the free will to enjoy them, and the responsibility to respect the rights of others. After fighting their revolution for freedom from colonialism, the founders were intelligent enough to retain a healthy fear of the similar threats posed by Corporate power, and wisely limited Corporations exclusively to a business role. In the United States of America, up until the mid to late 1800’s, in order to create a company or Corporation, you would have to go through the arduous process of earning a charter from a particular state, which was both limited in duration and function needing to be renewed, but also subject to rules, regulations and heavy taxes.  They were also mandated to serve the public interest, with profit being the result to shareholders who were part of the public. If they exceeded their authority, went against their charter or went against the public interest a Corporation’s charter could be revoked rendering it invalid and essentially destroying it in the legal sense. The concept of “Corporate Personhood” came about around this time, which quickly gained popularity among business leaders.

When we were being formed as the Colonies, it took a lot of money to get the supplies and ships over here to form those original 13 colonies. The British Bankers and British Crown fronted a lot of cash, which they were happy to do because they knew that as long as they owned the Colonies, they knew that the resources of the Colonies would pay back a very good return on their investment in the long haul. But when we broke away from them with the Declaration of Independence, they had no return on their investment and thus had a legitimate claim of debt against us. If we weren’t going to be theirs anymore, we needed to repay them what they had invested to get the Colonies started. It was a legitimate debt that we owed when we were formed. There are sentences in the Constitution  that read that the debts under the Confederacy are continued under this Constitution so the Constitution is also an agreement of debt to the British as well as the French because we asked the French to help us defeat the British and they wanted to be paid back for their military expenditures. So we were basically broke when we became a country.

When other countries loan to another country, the bank note is a 70-year contract. So Seventy years after the revolution, this contract for the 70-year note came due under the Lincoln administration. The United States did not have the money under Lincoln to pay off the note, and Abe didn’t want to give the public lands of the 13 colonies and the public lands of the Louisiana Purchase back to the Europeans in a Foreclosure on his watch. So Lincoln asked the Bankers if the US could renegotiate the loan. And what do Bankers always say to you when you ask to renegotiate a loan? They say, “Well we might do that, but we’re going to want some up front money, we’re going to want better terms and we’re going to want more collateral.”

Under Lincoln there were now 34 republics, many of which were not part of the original 13 nor of the Louisiana Purchase. They wanted the public lands of all 34 Republics to be held as collateral against the new national debt for the next 70 years. So when the Southern states learned that they were being asked to do this in a war they hadn’t fought in, for collateral to bankers under terms they didn’t agree with, not only did they not sign any documents, they seceded from the Union completely! Just as with the American Revolution, it turns out that despite the fact that the history books in our schools reflect State’s Rights and the Abolition of Slavery as the prime causes of the Civil War, the chief underlying catalyst was the collateralizing of the public lands of formerly sovereign. republics.

The southern states decided to leave the Union and had every right to do that as sovereign individual nation-states. They had the right to break the Constitutional contract at that point. We called the Constitution a Compact at its inception, but ultimately it was just a contract between the states. When the Southern states walked out of Congress on March 27th 1861 the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution was lost. The only votes that Congress could Lawfully take under Parliamentary Law were those to set the time to reconvene to take the vote to get a quorum and to vote to adjourn and set a date time and place to reconvene. But instead the Congress abandoned the House and the Senate without setting a date and that’s called Sine Die.

Now Lincoln had a problem. He no longer had a quorum to convene Congress, so he couldn’t renegotiate the loan the power to pass Laws had fleeted away with the secession of the southern states. Congress ceased to exist. They no longer even had the ability to declare war.


On March the 27th of 1861, our Lawful Congress disappeared forever. Several weeks later, a man who was claiming to be President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln issued executive order #1. Why do I say claiming to be President? When the contract called the Constitution cease to exist, so did the United States, therefore Lincoln was no longer president. The United States only existed because of the contract of the Constitution – the Consent of the Governed.  So when Lincoln issued Executive Order #1 he established Martial Rule of all Federal Territories, and they found a way to take back control of all the territories on April 15th. This date has remained with us like a scar ever since. Everyone knows what April 15th is today. It’s the day you pay those unconstitutional Income taxes in exchange for a bribe from the Internal Revenue Service to not make a fuss about the interest you should have accrued when you didn’t have access to these monies.

In 1863 Abraham Lincoln issued the General Order 100. This was the synthesis for the Lieber Code that has come to replace the old Government with what we’re all living under today. Remember, the Constitution disappeared in 1861, but in 1863 they needed some way to govern the Federal Territories and they did that through General Orders 100. It instituted a Military Government, and the dictatorship was established in 1861 because there was no Congress and there was no President.

Also in 1863, the Supreme Court was abolished. After all, why would they need a Supreme Court if there was no longer a contractual obligation with the Constitution? The Article 3 Judiciary didn’t exist anymore, so why even pretend that there was Supreme Court? They reestablished a New Supreme Court in the District of Columbia that they controlled completely, but it isn’t the same Supreme Court the founders put into place, and this illegitimate De Facto Supreme Court is with us still today.

In 1865 the second 13th Amendment was created. Why? -Because the first version of the13th Amendment didn’t allow attorneys to hold office. You couldn’t have a title of nobility under the original 13th Amendment which was still part of the original, organic Constitution. What they replaced it with in 1865 under the pretense of “Freeing the Slaves” was more about creating a system of voluntary servitude for all Americans as a possibility.

Howard Zinn contends: “The 14th Amendment was passed at the end of the Civil War to give equal rights to black people. And therefore it said, “No state can deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of Law.” That was intended to prevent the states from taking away life, liberty or property from black people as they have done through so much of our history. And what happens is Corporations come into court, and Corporation Lawyers are very clever. “Oh, you can’t describe a person of life, liberty or property. We are a person. A Corporation is a person. And the Supreme Court goes along with that.”

In 1870 the 15th Amendment was passed, granting Americans the Legal right to vote – not Lawful right to Vote. Why does this distinction matter? They made it so you had to register to vote to participate in their legal system. Did you need to register to vote before 1870? Absolutely not, but do today. You actually had a right to participate prior to 1865. Adding insult to injury, the elite have made it a privilege to vote, as opposed to a right. What can you do with a privilege that you can’t do with a right? Take it away.

Also in 1870, something really important happened. The department of Justice was created. There was no Article 3 Judiciary and they needed some semblance of Law. But under what does DOJ fall? Department of Justice falls under the direct authority of the Executive branch as a department thereof. So who is in control of the Legal System? The President. This bastardization of the American government makes our president a dictator-like entity. Ultimately the top Law Enforcement officer under this new system is the Attorney General, who has nothing to do with the Supreme Court.

In 1871 a new private municipal Corporation was created under the Organic Act, and it had a charter called the Constitution of the United States of America; a private Corporate charter. This is not the Article 6 Constitution that was written in 1789, because it was assembled in 1871 that only resembles the original, which was never intended to be a living document and very specifically said so. The one America uses today is living because they can change it up and do whatever they want. Congress started giving the banks the right to rule. They stripped away our freedoms by developing the Corporation on a piece of paper.

With no Constitutional authority to do so whatsoever Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia with the Act of 1871, which replaced our organic Constitution and with a Corporate Constitution. America is not even a country anymore. It is a Corporation. Now that every aspect of our life is under control, we can see that Benito Mussolini was right when he said that, “Facsim should more appropriately be called Corporatism, because it is a merger of state and Corporate power.”


Going on to 1913 we officially gave away the power of our economy to the banks when Woodrow Wilson agreed to sign the Federal Reserve Act into law in exchange for campaign financing.

Back then there was no FDIC and no guaranteed deposits, so when a bank failed the money supply shrank by the amount of deposits in that bank. And there were many bank failures so the money supply was shrinking. The Federal Reserve took expansionary actions, but they never took them far enough to offset the shrinkage. If the supply of money shrinks you can’t maintain the same levels of purchases. The shock wave of the stock exchange collapse had not subsided before the effects of the irreversible spiral of recession began to be felt. American industrial production dropped by half.  Thousands of families had to rely on the soup kitchen for food. America’s sturdiest strongholds collapsed after the Wall Street crash, which was in stark contrast to their recent period of rapid growth. One worker in Five was unemployed. The population seemed anesthetized. In New York, where every month 17,000 families were put on the streets, hundreds of thousands of unemployed, including many white-collar workers, struggled to survive, trudging through the cold for hours just to get a bowl of soup and a piece of bread.

In this dramatic context, the elections of November 1932 had symbolic significance. Roosevelt promised to curb the devastating effects of the 1929 crash, with measures such as the reform of the banking system, the assurance of a healthy currency, and economic and social aid. But what convinced the voters was to his despair, his rather hasty promise to repeal the amendment which prohibited the consumption of alcohol. In other words, the end of Prohibition. Franklin D. Roosevelt won with 23 million votes, compared to Hoover’s 16 million. This landslide victory put the democrats in power for the next twenty years.

Preceded by a big show, Roosevelt launched his program to fight the effects of the Great Depression, and to give a new boost to the American economy which had been ravaged since the 1929 Stock Market crash. Five Billion dollars were allocated to fight unemployment. Over 3 million Americans were hired, rising to 8 million two years later. Roosevelt had 15 keys Laws passed. He established a system of social welfare, pensions, and unemployment benefit. He outlawed child labor, discrimination against tiring blacks and women, and introduced a minimum wage.

Author of the 1994 publication, The Creature From Jekyll Island, G Edward Griffin dispels any myths we have about the benevolence of American Corporations:

“It always comes as a shock when people realize that some of the greatest tyrants and mass murders of history, were actually supported and funded by very wealthy financiers and forces in the United States and in Great Britain. Everybody knows about the rise of Hitler, but they don’t realize that the Nazi Party was funded by Banking Dynasties that still exist in the United States. They funded him. The large Corporations went into partnership with some of the German Corporations and called it I.G. Farben. It was a cartel that put up tremendous amounts of money as investment into the Nazi War machine.”

Today, the president is the Chief Executive Officer of this Corporation called the United States of America, not a democratically elected leader of the free world.


CEO’s are for companies. A Corporation Sole is a Corporation except there is only one (sole) individual who holds that title or owns that Corporation. The office of the Pope is a Corporation Sole. The office of the King is a Corporation Sole. The Governor Generals, Lieutenant Governors, all of the Catholic Church’s bishops and Arch Bishops and Cardinals and beyond – they all hold Corporation Soles. Take a look at the US Security and Exchange Commission. Countries are listed there, registered as Corporations and actually have to file with the Security and Exchange Commission in New York annually. These Corporations list income tax payments  as a stream of revenue for them, and they publish this information.



When a person shows up to court, they typically concede that the system has something incriminating on them, that the judge and the prosecutor hate them, but most of all they concede guilt.  Alan Watts has contended that we in the west are all afflicted with Ontological guilt, that is if a Policeman shows at the door we all immediately wonder what we’ve done wrong. There’s something wrong with that paradigm. This is why there is a widespread misconception that smoking marijuana induces paranoia.  The fact is that the user is not paranoid because of something that marijuana is doing to them chemically.  Marijuana intensifies one’s sensitivity to their surroundings by many fold.  The fact remains that because partaking of such a beautiful experience that makes one more sensitive is simultaneously visited by the fact that they could be persecuted by government agents for it, the person understandably can become paranoid, absolutely.  Didn’t the poles feel paranoid when the Gestapo were inspecting everyone’s house and terrorizing the people?  Imagine the kind of paranoia you might feel smoking pot in Nazi Germany, because our present situation isn’t much better. Should people who don’t agree just “move away” from homes and ecosystems that have sustained them for generations?  Is the pot smoker injuring another party by smoking pot?  One could argue (and they certainly have before) that the pot smoker is supporting terrorism by giving a financial reward to the trafficking and cultivation of a Schedule-1 controlled substance.  Well we can rule that out right away because so many people who live in the state of Montana are growing it, none of whom fit the mold for a Terrorist.  It isn’t a novel idea that there are many bad Laws or good people who break them.  In fact good people breaking bad Laws is more or less what this country was founded on, wasn’t it?  Everybody knows that being treated like a criminal for failing to come to a complete stop at an empty four-way intersection in the middle of the night in their own neighborhood is absolutely ridiculous.  Everybody knows that it’s complete BS that through technical loopholes we all are somehow in big trouble if our car lacks a front license plate, or registration tags, or speeding by a mere five miles over the speed limit, or any of the other petty, technical offenses that supplant those citation quotas that Police Departments supposedly don’t have.  And yet courtrooms are packed with frightened citizens who just want to get in, get out and get the whole thing over with as quickly and painlessly as possible, even if it means parting with a few hundred of our hard earned dollars.

Court is like detention – the principal’s office for adults – and we’re all embarrassed just to be there.  After all, court is somewhere that criminals go, right?  Especially since so many television programs and movies are police or courtroom dramas where heinous murders and terrible crimes are the central focus.  No cop drama ever depicts defendants in court guilty of a traffic violation, but every cop drama depicts the enforcers drawing their guns and firing their weapons during desperate moments of heroism.  Yet I’ve known police officers who have said to me, “In ten years with the force I’ve never once drawn my weapon.”  So when we’re obligated to appear for court, we think to ourselves, “Everybody’s looking at me.  These people are all wondering what I did.  This is a place where criminals go.”  And the television dramas are usually the only exposure to courtrooms until we’re in one our ourselves.  And the judgmental part of your mind may wonder why everyone else is there. But no one is staring  because everyone else feels the same anxiety that you do, and as the judge begins calling them up to the tribunal one by one before reading off their charges, we begin to realize how completely frivolous so many of the complaints against them are.  The judge uses big words, towering above on high from a wooden throne, and the setting intimidates people with the imminent threat police force and arrest if someone fails to comply.  Does this sound like a free country to you?  This country fought a revolutionary war so that the people could get away from this kind of dictatorial rule.  But it isn’t necessarily dictatorial, because the good news is that this system was very much set up to benefit the individual  The problem is no one has ever taught us what to do in a courtroom, or what the words mean, or what is going on when our name is called.  We assume we need to hire a Lawyer to handle the affair, and in violent criminal cases that certainly can be true, hence the courtroom dramas on television.  We’ve been told we should know our rights a million times, but we are never taught how to actually implement them.  Knowing our rights isn’t enough in a system where others can take advantage of you through a court room proceeding, and people’s education on these matters would cost local and regional governments billions in revenue.  Let’s face it, they’re running a business.  We all know this for the same reason that we know police officers are required to meet quotas.  The way things are right now, it would be inconceivable to assume otherwise. Sure, media outlets and public figures will always deny this and paint a prettier picture, but in today’s world most people don’t trust the mainstream media for accurate reporting, and most of us are all too aware of the lies spit by politicians lips.  Government is a business that thrives by taking from X and giving to Y with the intention that it, the government, will be the beneficiary of the transaction.  The more transactions involved, the higher the profit margin.  Hence the more Laws there are, and thus the more loopholes with which to collect money from as many taxpayers as possible, the higher the profit.  And the fact that public schools perpetuate public ignorance regarding court proceedings only solidifies the bottom line that the establishment doesn’t want you knowing about what is actually happening when you enter a courtroom to represent yourself.  The good news is that you are about to walk through the door into a very special classroom.  I could call this class many things – Courtrooms for Dummies, or Trust Law 101, or Your Rights as a Human Being.  But let’s just say for now that the ledger on the door reads, “Outer Limits with Professor Dog Majik.” You’ll enter through this door into a larger world, and emerge from this classroom with a new view on reality.  As with all things, it is important to do your own research, and not to take anything I say as dogma, for that is not my intent.  I only wish to shed light on this issue, because we can’t open locked doors without the proper keys, and few of us have ever possessed the right keys to our freedom.

So with regards to most court cases, unless you have harmed another person, used fraud in a contract somewhere or affected their property, you have done nothing wrong.  In fact, for there to be what is commonly referred to as a “case,” there must be a damaged party from whom property has been stolen or damaged, or a victim who was assaulted or killed.  If none of those factors apply, why does an intimidating arrangement convene in a court room which you are obligated under threat of arrest to be present for, simply over something like a traffic ticket, or possession, or any other victimless crime?  I do not agree with the presumption that our freedoms or equity should be taken away when we have not harmed anyone.  In fact the term victimless crime is an oxymoron, for if there is no victim, there is no crime, unless you’re living under a fascist dictatorship.  And I don’t use the term fascism lightly.  I’m not the first one to describe our current state of affairs as such, because by definition, a system wherein large Corporations and banks merge with and have control over governments is textbook fascism.  That’s simply what it’s called.

No, court has not convened to preside over a crime, but to enforce statuettes.  And we all assume that the statutes apply to us, because we assume that statutes and Law are the same.  But just on the surface we know that there exist more Laws in the Lawbooks today than any one person – even a Lawyer –can even be aware or keep track of, and new Laws are being written constantly.  How is one supposed to keep up with all the new statutes coming into existence, especially since most of us spend most of our time just trying to scrape by?  They say that negligence of the Law is not an excuse, and they’re right, but we’re not talking about Law here.  We’re talking about statutes, which are not Law.  The question we ought to ask ourselves is not how to keep track of all the statutes, but what obligates the average person to them.  What makes me liable to a statute?  Is it citizenship?  Does living on a piece of land obligate me to be bound by statutes?  And what are statutes anyway?  And where is the contract that I signed that obligates me to all the existing statutes?  How is it that statutes are so often contrary to the Constitution of the United States?  Because of the founding documents we know what our rights should be, but on a daily basis they’re undermined or denied in total.  How can this be?  It can only be so with our consent.  If we consent to the statutes, we are bound by them.  This isn’t a call to revolution.  I’m not saying that we should break the Laws for the sake of breaking them.  But unjust Laws can only stand with our willful consent, and believe it or not, you don’t need to say anything for the system to assume you are giving them consent to enforce statutes over you.  The court system operates under presumptions.  They presume you don’t know anything about courtrooms; they assume you don’t know how to manage your legal account in court; and they assume that since you lack the ability to act as executor of your legal person in the courtroom, that they have the authority to manage it for you.  I know what you’re thinking – what is an executor of a legal person?  To understand this, we’ll revert to a question I asked a moment ago – where is the contract that I signed that obligates me to all existing statutes?  Believe it or not there are such a documents.  The first is your birth certificate.

When you were born your mother and father applied to enter into an agreement with the government and you, known as a Trust, and your Birth Certificate is the founding document.  No one owns title to the name on this document because so many parties have functional roles and vested interests in it.  As with car titles and housing deeds, regardless of who has the title, what matters is who has equity in the product.  When you become 18 years old, the equity to the legal person that appears on this Certificate is given entirely to you – it’s yours.  Your mother and father are the grantors of the trust that was created, and they put your share of the commonwealth into an organization with the expectation that you are going to benefit from this.  So when you come of age you become the grantor and beneficiary of your Corporation.  I know this may seem confusing, but bear with me here for just a moment.

Any trust agreement forms a Corporation, and there are three parties that merge to form it: the president, the shareholders and the employees. In trust Law, the president functions as the executor, the shareholders function as the beneficiaries, and the employees function as trustees.  The executor who acts as the President of the Corporation, sets policy, and those policies are handed to the employees, who, directed by the president, work to make money for the shareholders.  Thus the shareholders are the beneficiaries of this arrangement – because they are investors expecting something back in the form of dividends.  If what the employees are doing fails to make money for the shareholders, the shareholders can remove the president and reinstate a new president who will set better policies.  Put into legal terms, if the policy that the trustees follow, fails to bring dividends for the beneficiaries, the shareholders can remove the director from the board.

This model is also used to create Legal Persons, as individual Corporations.  You see, your parents initially function as the beneficiaries until you come of age at which point you become the beneficiary of your Corporation.  But you are always the executor of your Corporation, since you own all the equity in your legal person.  The executor and the beneficiary can be the same person, but neither can be an employee.  The reverse is also true, as employees cannot be beneficiaries or executors.  But in courtroom proceedings, most of us get suckered into acting in the capacity of an employee of the government, therefore granting the government executive power over you.  But if you are the director of your legal person, it is in fact the judge who is the employee – but this has to be stated at the top of the hearing, and written at the top of every document – otherwise their presumption that you are in fact liable, stands.

It is important to understand that you are not a legal person.  The legal person is not a living, biological organism.  The legal person is formed through the agreement made through the Trust.  Being aware of this, you can begin to take back control of your legal estate, and when you challenge the presumption that you are a trustee, you become known as a propria persona – the executor – the administrator – the chief executive officer.  No one represents you because you are the president of your legal person, and thus you set policy.  You are the president of your Corporation, unless you play the role of employee.  Since it is impossible for the Propria Persona to act in the capacity of a Legal Person, you cannot be the Legal Person though you are a very important component of the legal person.

We all unknowingly become liable by obtaining driver’s licenses and other government documents that are signed by the government.  Since a driver’s license is a government document signed off by the government, by obtaining one we unwittingly agree to acting in the capacity of a trustee of government, and are thus liable to the statutory regulations that govern public servants.

So when you go to court you are not showing up as a legal person – you’re showing up because a hearing is being conducted for a legal person that you have an interest in.  The problem is we get suckered into taking all the liability for everything that happens in there by playing the improper role – that is, the role of employee or trustee.
Now let’s say that you are a government employee and receive a government paycheck, then yes, statutory Law applies to you, since those are the rules that apply to agents of the government.  But say you are a government employee, and you get pulled over on your day off and written a traffic ticket.  See, you have to have been performing an action of government at the time the ticket was issued for the complaint to hold any water in court.  Unless you were acting in the capacity of a public servant at the time the complaint was made, it is irrelevant.  But this presumption is made in court with everyone, most of whom are not government employees, and unless you rebut this presumption, it stands, and we willingly enter into contract as trustees and are thus liable to statutes.   The court room is your court of record to convene, unless you do not know your rights, in which case the court and the judge will presume that since you do not know how to handle the account of your legal person, they have the authority to do so for you and thus act as the chief administrator of your account.  This presumption must be refuted before any person can proceed in court with their rights fully intact. All presumptions of Law stand until rebutted, so all one needs to do is simply rebut them.  Since the government derives its power from the people, the people set the policy.  YOU are the sole shareholder of all equity of your Legal Person defined by your Birth Certificate receipt identifying your estate.   The court room appearance is an administrative procedure to oversee the TRUST of your legal person.

The Live Birth Record is a very different document than your Birth Certificate.  For starters, Birth Certificates are warehouse certificates that establish ownership over a product.  Birth Certificates did not exist until 1933, when Social Security was implemented.  The Social Security System was not put into place to give retirement benefits to elderly folks, though that is one of the symptoms of it.  The Social Security System was established because the United States of America was bankrupt to the Federal Reserve Bank who had gained control over our money supply just two decades earlier in 1913.  After loaning the country’s money to America at interest, America inevitably fell into bankruptcy and was forced to put up collateral.  Their answer was the Social Security System, which established a Social Security number for every American as a monetary guarantee to the Federal Reserve.  In other words we were all put up as collateral on the debt owed to the private Central Bank.  It was also in 1933 that the unconstitutional IRS and Income Tax system was established, to manage the bankruptcy.  The income tax is the annual levy to the Federal Reserve put into place as the collateral on the bankruptcy.  The deeper the US goes into debt, the more the taxpayers are obligated to honor this collateral agreement that few of us have ever understood.  And the Birth Certificate is the establishing document that obligates you not only to make payments to the Federal Reserve on behalf of the United States, but makes you party to all of the statutes and benefits of the United States.   You’ll notice that at the boarders of your birth certificate resemble the same webbing that appears on the one-dollar bill – and you’ll notice that it too is a bank note.  In fact if you take a close look at the very bottom of your Birth Certificate will appear the words, “Banknote,” or “Midwest Banknote company,” or something similar.  This is because your Birth Certificate is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.  You can’t cash this in because that money is only worth something to the Federal Reserve.  It’s a collateral note, typically worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $650,000 – $750,000 dollars – that’s the estimated tax revenue over the course of your life.  You’ll also notice upon close inspection of this Certificate that your name appears in all capital letters.  This has been called many things, from the Strawman to Capitis Diminutio Maxima to the Legal Person.  Let us for now understand that regardless of what we names we give the all caps name, the fact that it appears in all capital letters is a presumption of Law.

The Birth Certificate is a receipt, and in fact the only document we receive that is signed by the government, thus proving the government has an obligation to us.  When we come of legal age we become Executor and Beneficiary of all equity invested in our Legal Persons.  As such we are thus the Director, Administrator and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.  Our obligation to this model, however, ends with the initial investment made by our parents and ourselves.

Since no one can own the legal title to something living, the Legal Person is its own entity, in and to itself, thus necessitating the actions of people to act in its interest, not unlike a Corporation.  But if you happen to be the General Executor of this account, it’s important to ask, by whose authority does anyone use this name as personal identification for you?

Whenever court calls a formal hearing for the Legal Person it is recognized that all relevant parties in attendance of the hearing are acting as agents of the Legal Person.  If a court aims to make claims or legal determinations against you, demand some proof for the public record first.

Facts can only be defined as agreements between parties; if separate entities identify similar words to have different meanings, the parties disagree on what the facts are.  Since the legal definitions of words used in the legal world are drastically different from the common usage, there can be no determinations of the facts until a reconciliation of the definitions of the words that are being used are bridged between yourself and all other interested parties involved. The use of Legalese in the semantically driven dictation of Admiralty Law has created a vernacular that, while similar to the English language is drastically different in meaning and interpretation.  The definitions of the words “person,” “address,” “mail,” “resident,” “motor vehicle,” “driving,” “passenger,” “employee,” “income” and many others, have been altered away from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject of slave status without citizen acceptance, compliance or knowledge.

Since the driver’s license is in fact not your property, but property of the government, presenting it to an officer upon his request presumes that YOU are acting as a public servant at the time ID is requested.  By handing over a drivers license, you have unwittingly perjured yourself as an employee, and thus liable as a driver.  But chances are that you were not acting in the capacity of a driver, since a driver is defined as the licensed operator of a motor vehicle, and a motor vehicle is defined as a commercial vessel carrying either goods for sale or employees for hire.  You have a right to freely travel about in your automobile, and do so without a license, registration or insurance, unless you’re a commercial vehicle, but even then you have to be working in a government capacity. So if you get a ticket, the court has the burden of producing payroll records that might indicate that YOU were in fact acting in the capacity of a public trustee at the time the complaint was issued, and therefore bound by statutory regulation.  State issued identification is only in place so that officers can identify Legal Persons in order to ascertain jurisdiction over them, and cite them under statutory regulation.
Supplying a peace officer with state issued identification consequently identifies you as someone who has applied for government benefits, and thus bound by statutory regulation.  Since government underwrites damage caused by its public servants, it assumes limited liability to all of its public employees.  if government assumes liability for your actions, it is only logical that they would want to ensure that YOU do not act in an undesirable manner for which the government would be responsible, and if YOU did, to correct those actions at the department of “corrections.”  It is however, impossible for a person other than you to assume liability for your actions.

I’m not saying that Human Beings are exempt from learning how to properly maneuver an automobile, nor that any Human Being who acts irresponsibly while traveling in an automobile is exempt from the liability of their actions.  Insurance companies, however, and the unconstitutional requirement to pay unnecessary monies to these private Corporations, do implicate that driver’s of motor vehicles are not accountable for their own actions, which is why the government and indeed the insurance companies can assume liability in the first place.  Public servants liable to the government need Drivers Licenses and Social Security Numbers, and Jurisdiction is therefore presumed over them. Since a Social Security Number allows you to play the role of a government agent should YOU so choose, it is necessary to reiterate the fact that YOU were not acting in the capacity of an agent of government at the time the complaint was made.  In presuming that YOU are bound by one of the existing statutes which would regulate you, also presumes that a contract exists between you and the government.  The court therefore must provide evidence that YOU have been compelled to perform in this name according to a contract somewhere.

Limiting the birthright of freedom of travel to licensed operators of motor vehicles is an unconstitutional determination.  The Public pays for the public roads, which constitutes travel as a right, not a privilege.  I’m going to say that again – travel is not a privilege, it is a right, since we pay for the public roadways, but police officers often claim the contrary.  Nevertheless, it is impossible to assert that only individuals with money to pay for these unnecessary limitations may access public roadways.  If there is any claim that we do not have access to public roadways, the courts are required to provide us with evidence of this claim.


The Supreme Court made the following determination in the case of Kale v. Henkel:

“The individual may stand upon his Constitutional rights as a citizen.  He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way.  His power to contract is unlimited.  He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property.  His rights are such as existed by the Law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of Law, and in accordance with the Constitution.  Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the Law.  He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel,  201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).

Thus we reserve our natural common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that we did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.  And furthermore, should not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended “benefit” of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.

As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly created obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to us, and are null and void.  If we have participated in any of the supposed “benefits” associated with these hidden contracts, we have all done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative.  We may have received such “benefits” but have not accepted them in a manner that binds us to anything.

Any such participation does not constitute “acceptance” in contract Law, because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid “offer,” and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion, under contract Law.  Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no “meeting of the minds,” and therefore no valid contract.  Any supposed “contract” is therefore void.

This position adheres to accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brady v. U.S., 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970):

“Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences.”



Speak up. Withdraw consent. Ask questions. Do your own research. And most importantly, know thyself.

Do you want to make the world a better place for your children? If the answer is yes, then you must realize that you have to do it yourself. No one is going to do it for you, and it starts with letting go of your fear. We should ask ourselves, is it really the best we can do to become debt slaves like our parents and then slip into retirement learning that we’ve got no pension, that all those years of paying into it wasn’t worth it because they were just going to rip us off in the end anyway, and wheel us into hospital wards and try to kill us with pharmaceuticals as quickly as possible – is that really as good as it gets?
Of course not! Freedom, peace and abundance for every man woman and child, living in harmony with nature, in mutual cooperation with each other, everywhere on the planet. That’s the best it can get.


So to conclude, here are a few seldom understood concepts you can put to good use right away in direct action applications.
If you sue for false arrest (or false imprisonment), the arrest is presumed to be false and all you need to prove is that the arrest occurred, and then the burden is on the officer to prove that it wasn’t false. For an imprisonment, all you need is to show that you were “restrained of your liberty by words and acts which you feared to disregard. And a car stop constitutes an arrest or imprisonment. If an officer says he has a warrant for your arrest, you can demand to see the warrant as well as the supporting affidavit, and if he arrests you without producing them, it’s a false arrest. The police routinely ignore and violate this Law, but officers are personally liable for any misdeeds during a warrant arrest. You can even ask an officer for his business card and ID, and if he doesn’t comply, he’s out of uniform. It might shock you to know that you have the absolute right to resist a false arrest with as much force as necessary, and if an officer misbehaves, you can complain to Risk Management. If they attempt to administer a breathalyzer, let it be known that the Federal Pure Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act that set up the FDA makes it illegal for anyone but a licensed physician to operate a breathalyzer? If an officer asks you a question, you have the right to ignore him and keep walking.


Citations that Police write end up in the courts, but many court documents are “signed” with a rubber stamp. Many clerks and attorneys have such stamps with a judge’s signature pressed into them. So how can you know the warrant wasn’t stamped by a clerk or attorney? How can a rubber-stamp signature on a warrant possibly be legal?

[1]  How To Sign Your Name Without Assuming Liability


Gabrielle Lafayette is a journalist, writer, and executive producer for the Outer Limits Radio Show.
Check out the more frequently updated tumblr page at
Contact the research team at

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s