FEAR = False Evidence Appearing Real

There’s no denying that powerful people are exploiting the fear that this crisis is creating, for a whole range of reasons, as they have always done. And the trillions of dollars being pumped into Wall Street, while renters and homeowners get the shaft once again, served as  one of the early indicators that the more things change, the more they stay the same. That our federal government had no clear plan made the crisis undeniably worse. And now that the United States is reported to have more cases than any other country on earth means America is primed to experience the lion’s share of fear, especially since tens of millions of Americans don’t have health coverage, millions more stand to lose their benefits when they become unemployed, and still millions more are staring down the barrel of homelessness when they fail to make rent on April 1st. The virus has infected many, but the fear associated with it has infected everyone.

ESrRuCEU4AYAZRd

The fact that coroners are overwhelmed to the point of re-purposing ice skating rinks to deal with the avalanche of bodies piling up in Spain confirms that people are dying and the threat is very real. Our point, is that the .01% are using the crisis to enrich themselves to the detriment of the American people, the US Constitution, and the common good.

It’s not a hoax. It’s a perfect storm.

The media are making the crisis worse by reporting this situation in ways that just don’t make sense. And the numbers of deaths are proving the most significant engine of that confusion. As of this writing, we’re told that total recorded cases of CoViD-19 have climbed to 601,536, with 27,441 deaths.

But where are those statistics coming from and how are they being calculated?

Authorities say they’re determining the spread of this virus with PCR tests (Polymerase Chain Reaction). PCR is defined as “a method widely used in molecular biology to rapidly make millions to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample allowing scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail.” And if you get tested for the Coronavirus, PCR is the method for performing that test.

There’s only one giant problem with using PCR to determine Coronavirus infection:

PCR test kits only determine whether ANY kind of Coronavirus is present in your system, including the common cold, flu, bacterial pneumonia — ANYTHING falling under the umbrella of viruses known as Coronaviruses will come back “positive” on a PCR test, which will then be identified specifically as CoViD-19.

But there are no reliable tests for a specific CoViD-19 virus because Coronaviruses are extremely common and the tests cannot distinguish between one type of Coronavirus and another.

Everyone, including you, likely has a few Coronaviruses floating around in their system at any given time. But most will not cause illness because the quantities of virus microbes are too few. And if your immune system is doing its job, it’s constantly killing off the continuous influx of intruders that are ever-present in our surrounding environment.

But all of the different Coronavirus strains will cause the PCR tests to register “positive” which will cause the number of cases reported by the media to increase exponentially as long as we care to measure them.

As reported by Julian Rose yesterday:

PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi, even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR (Case Fatality Rate) higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

So the more that everyone is tested with PCR, the more cases are guaranteed to appear, which the corporate media will continue to blow completely out of proportion, in-turn stoke more fear, thus allowing for more justification for more control.

“But what about the deaths in Italy?!”

First off, the fact remains that our corporate media have a vested interest in spreading fear like a virus to boost ratings and maximize advertising revenue. Remember that during Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, the CEO of CBS admitted that his presidential run “may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS!”

Moonvest

Les Moonves, former CEO of CBS

The mainstream media aren’t staffed by journalists. They serve as the Public Relations arm of the ownership class, manipulating public opinion to serve their own interests instead of what they’re supposed to do, which is provide accurate information to the public. Because a well-informed electorate is necessary for a functioning democracy.

Nevertheless, bits of truth still manage to slip through the cracks from time to time, which is why Bloomberg recently admitted that 99% of Italians who have died were already suffering from unrelated life-threatening illnesses:

Yes, people are dying. But every single year 646,000 humans die from the seasonal flu on this planet. Yet somehow, every single year previous to this one, we’ve managed to keep society from grinding to a halt.

Furthermore, nobody knows how many people actually have the virus, so the numbers peddled by the corporate media that are inciting waves of uproarious panic around the globe simply cannot be accurate.

Because how can anyone possibly know what the death ratios really are when the chaotic circumstances of the situation creates countless incentives for people to conceal their symptoms?

For starters, people have to pay rent and they know that getting quarantined might cost them their homes if they’re unable to earn wages. Most wage earners do not have paid sick leave and can’t afford to take a day off, let alone a week, let alone several weeks. This is why an Amazon assistant manager recently discovered several sick employees who tested positive for CoViD-19 but were still at work despite their deathly appearance. Christian Smalls, who manages the Staten Island Amazon facility “JFK8” describes the reason they were still on the job:

“Because Amazon is not offering paid sick leave. They’re offering unlimited unpaid time off, which is ridiculous because people shouldn’t be forced to sit at home without getting paid for choosing to be safe in quarantine..”

Next, more than 30 million Americans were already uninsured prior to this crisis. More than 68,000 Americans die every year from a lack of health insurance, which constitutes an ongoing pandemic for the poor and working classes that the media and political classes historically have never paid any attention to. Hence the growing popularity for Medicare-For-All. As the Guardian reports, millions are about to lose their health insurance in a pandemic because it’s tied to their employment status.

And even people who do have health insurance often receive coverage through their employment, which they risk losing if they get laid off or fired. More often than not, those insurance policies come with huge deductibles, which means that people will be reluctant to be tested and hesitate to be identified, which in-turn exacerbates the virus’ undetected spread.

Finally, undocumented immigrants are afraid to go into medical facilities because doing so might result in detention, deportation, or worse.

The point is, there is NO WAY to know how many cases there are of any Coronavirus because countless citizens have every reason to conceal their symptoms. Therefore, it is impossible to know what the death ratio is. So no one can honestly publish death rate percentages because they can’t possibly know how many people are actually infected by any Corona-class virus!

It seems recklessly irresponsible for the media to report and repeat death-toll statistics, especially considering that antiviral medications getting prescribed to patients (namely Ribavirin) can cause anemia, which can be life-threatening for people with heart conditions or circulation problems. But if those people die from the associated “side effects” of the drugs, they’re included in the CoViD-19 casualty statistics. And as the numbers continue to climb the panic will grow.

Even Yahoo Finance acknowledged this reality when determining how Germany’s death toll is so low compared to Italy:

Making direct comparisons between national mortality rates can be misleading, not just because of recording lags and different methodologies on reporting cases and deaths, but also because of the extent of testing. The more aggressively a country tests for coronavirus, the more cases of mild infections will be found and recorded in the statistics, which pushes the fatality percentage rate down.”

But that’s not the only reason for the disparity between Germany and Italy. It turns out Italian officials are actually lying about their death numbers.

Advisor to the Italian Minister of Health, Professor Walter Ricciardi, confirms that the Italian government are inflating their Coronavirus fatality numbers.

“The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.

“On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three,” he says.

Christopher Kohls corroborates that the Italians have been irresponsibly overstating their fatalities by orders of magnitude.

“Recently a friend of ours told us that they have a relative in Italy who died of cancer. But the official cause of death was listed as “Coronavirus”. The family was confused. Their grandmother didn’t have Coronavirus. She had cancer. She had been sick for a long time. They knew she was nearing the end. It seemed almost disrespectful to list her death inaccurately. When they asked the doctor why the death was listed as Coronavirus, they were told, because they needed to get the  numbers up.

“Now, I was a bit skeptical of this story at first as it was a third or fourth hand account… So I started looking into it. And it’s true. Italian medical workers are inflating their Coronavirus death numbers”

Perhaps this helps explain why Italian authorities have gone completely off the deep end, threatening to deploy police with flamethrowers against graduation parties and other gatherings that congregate in defiance of social distancing protocols.

Finally, when healthy people are tested with PCR, they likely have shreds of some type of Coronavirus DNA present within their bodies, even if they’re not exhibiting symptoms at the time of the test. So the media can artificially balloon “case figures” with asymptomatic carriers while claiming that this is just the beginning; that more deaths are imminent; that the end is nigh. And the subsequent panic can then be used as an excuse to quarantine the U.S. Constitution.

But reporters who demonstrate an authentic commitment to journalism continue to be accused of ‘minimizing’ the danger as a way of bullying them into shutting up about these inconvenient facts and skewed numbers that simply don’t add up.

Again, this is not to dismiss the very real dangers that exist in the world, of course. But the media’s statistics seem like propaganda when the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) themselves corroborate the fact that the seasonal flu is more than twice as deadly as CoViD-19, according to their own numbers.

who3

The most frustrating aspect of this entire situation is that it’s difficult to know what is real because the reporting is all over the map, which worsens the crisis by suggesting that there might not be anything to worry about. Granted, it’s an unfolding situation, we don’t have all the facts yet, and nobody’s perfect. But the uncertainty created by the conflicting information from official sources makes the everything unequivocally worse.

Because fear is the currency of control.

Fear is useful for frightening a population into demanding protection from the “authorities”, for we will accept anything that is done in the name of ‘protecting’ us, including suspending the Constitution, muzzling dissidents, indefinitely detaining American citizens, bypassing courts, quarantining communities, outlawing religious gatherings, prohibiting political assemblies, shutting down entire industries, manipulating the economy, reshaping financial markets, eliminating cash, replacing it with a digital currency, indefinitely detaining American citizens without trial, suspending the statute of limitations, terminating habeas corpus, and ultimately determining who should live or die.

big_government_tyranny2 (1)

And if Social Distancing is really a matter of such grave importance, then why are the Secret Service allowing crowds of bloated bureaucrats to literally huddle around the President of the United States at every press conference, especially when many of the individuals within those crowds are coughing and shaking hands? Isn’t the president over the age of 60, and thus part of the “highly vulnerable” population?

And why did so many government and Wall Street insiders sell off literally billions in stocks during the weeks and months leading up to this crisis? Could it be that they have access to a different information stream than the rest of us? Could it be that they knew a game-changer was coming down the pike? And could it have anything to do with the Event 201 pandemic scenario that began on October 18, 2019, during the weeks directly preceding the global shutdown?

201

Now is the time to boost your immune system naturally by ingesting foods and supplements  rich in Vitamins D, A and C, (but especially Vitamin D) while also practicing good hygiene and self care. But it is also absolutely essential that we pay very close attention to how the rulers are using manufactured panic to tighten their stranglehold on society. Because if we don’t, the society we return to will be unrecognizable from the one we left behind.

We’ve asserted since the beginning of the shutdowns that this situation wouldn’t be resolving itself any time soon, and we remain suspicious that things will “return to normal” following the coming Easter weekend as Trump is promising now. If the authorities were up front with everyone about the possibility of shutting down the economy for the next 18 months, there might be some blowback. So they instead announce the shut down in a piecemeal fashion, two weeks at a time, imposing ever-greater restrictions at every turn. Incrementalism is the name of the game. Because frogs that realize they’re being boiled to death tend to leap out of the pan.

“If we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.” ~Romans 8:25

infoG

Gabrielle Lafayette is the executive producer for the Outer Limits Radio Show. This cache of thought is presented free of charge as a service and gift to you. May our eternal vigilance help liberate all beings from the smoke-and-mirrors deceptions of the Samsaric Panopticon.

Nothing Spreads Like Fear

Keeping up with the 2020 headlines feels like drinking from a fire hose. As Novel Coronavirus fever continues its viral spread worldwide, the flabbergasting news cycle unfolds at an accelerating rate: US to Ban Travel From Europe for 30 DaysQuarantine Breaker Subdued & Arrested By Swarm Of Police In HazmatDenmark Passes Law Enabling Forced Coronavirus VaccinationsGovernment Using Cell Phones To Track “Social Distancing”We’re Not Going Back To Normal.

Then the nationwide rollout of new social protocols. Schools will remain closed following spring break, probably for the rest of the year. Restaurants and bars are closed. No delivery. No take-out. Theaters are closed until further notice, as are gyms. Shopping centers are closed. Hotel rentals have fallen to zero. Property management agencies are announcing they will no longer accept cash for rent payments. San Francisco instituted a 24-hour curfew. Governor Gavin Newsom issued an unprecedented statewide “stay at home” order for California’s 40 million residents. New York City is completely locked down. At least 25 States have deployed the National Guard. All sporting events are cancelled. International flights are cancelled. All entertainment events are cancelled. All events everywhere are cancelled. As of this writing, more than 70 million Americans remain at home in mandatory isolation; solitary confinement writ large. And mass house arrest suddenly becomes the global norm.

New-York-Los-Angeles-shut-bars-restaurants-worlds-central-banks-coordinate-on-coronavirus

Empty streets are a common sight in major cities this year

Many have compared this outbreak to the Spanish Flu, which killed more than 50,000 humans between January 1918 and December 1920. Whether CoVid-19 will prove comparably lethal remains to be seen, but the existence of the internet stands out as the critical difference between then and now. Such a comprehensive global communications network did not exist at the time, making a rapid, coordinated, worldwide effort to stop the disease impossible.

But the very same communications network that makes modern containment possible has also enabled a new level of global fear-mongering the likes of which we’ve never witnessed before. And as the frenzied global news coverage numbs and subdues a significant proportion of the population, many others seem oddly addicted to the anxiety.

Indeed, millions of people are “comforting” themselves by watching horror movies like Outbreak, Contagion, and I Am Legend to get through this crisis. But succumbing to collective dread like this manifests increasingly irrational human behavior. And as Vigilant Citizen notes, much of this behavior is literally programmed into society by the movies and media we consume:

“As Coronavirus spreads fear and panic across the world, streaming services have been observing a spike of interest in the 2011 movie Contagion. Starring Matt Demon, Gwyneth Paltrow and Lawrence Fishburne, the movie follows the outbreak of a deadly virus called MEV-1 and its disastrous impacts on society. Needless to say, in today’s context, Contagion is not a comforting watch. In fact, if the whole Coronavirus situation is already making you anxious, you should probably avoid Contagion. Because it will only make things worse.

“In fact, the slogan of the movie is Nothing spreads like fear’and that is basically the goal of the movie.”

fish

Like MEV-1, CoViD-19 may seem scary in and of itself, but our collective response feels far more frightening. While some of us are infected by the virus, just about everyone has succumbed to the virus of fear, which spreads even faster and less descriminately. You might be able to avoid the Coronavirus through isolation, but avoiding the infectious proliferation of fear has proven far more difficult.

Fear is a powerful force of paralysis. We’ve all felt its emotionally incapacitating effects as individuals. But on a global scale, the effects of fear can cripple entire economies and bring formerly sovereign societies to their knees. And the media hubbub surrounding CoViD-19 has focused the entire world’s attention upon a frightening singularity. But for those who are able to keep a clear head through difficult times, the magnitude of the fear broadcasting on every channel around the world 24/7 seems greatly exaggerated, if not grossly irresponsible.

Did you know that every single year, approximately 646,000 people die of the flu worldwide? That’s already a pandemic, and one that our media and governments have never responded to like this.

Did you know that the Word Health Organization’s own statistics reveal that the seasonal flu is far deadlier than CoViD-19?

who3

As Ben Swann reports, when the W.H.O. published their official findings, the numbers suggested that CoViD-19 yields a mortality rate of 4%. But according to their own numbers, the death rate for the seasonal flu during the same time period was nearly 10%. 

This means that the seasonal flu is more than twice as deadly as CoViD-19, according to the W.H.O. But we’ve never allowed society to grind to a halt over concerns related to the seasonal flu. And while authorities tell us to be weary of misinformation and disinformation, these kinds of statistical inconsistencies make distinguishing fact from fiction a difficult task.

The “official” numbers repeated by the media are crude and poorly calculated because they leave out very important information, including the omission of “mild” cases. But those crude numbers are nevertheless propelling global panic. That panic is the driving force behind the international lockdown, which creates an economic meltdown that allows for an unprecedented power grab by those who stand to benefit from the crisis.


Italy — one of the countries hardest hit — has announced that that 99% of Italians who have died in this crisis were already suffering from unrelated life-threatening illnesses.

From Bloomberg:

“More than 99% of Italy’s Coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country’s national health authority.”

“The Rome-based institute has examined medical records of about 18% of the country’s Coronavirus fatalities, finding that just three victims, or 0.8% of the total, had no previous pathology. Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses and about a fourth had either one or two previous conditions.”

“More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease.”

“The average age of those who’ve died from the virus in Italy is 79.5. As of March 17, 17 people under 50 had died from the disease. All of Italy’s victims under 40 have been males with serious existing medical conditions.”

On top of that, the “cure” may be worse than the disease, since one of the antiviral drugs being used to treat CoViD-19 might actually be the final nail in the coffin for elderly Italians.  According to cardiosmart.org, “Ribavirin may decrease the number of red blood cells in your body. This is called anemia and it can be life-threatening in people who have heart disease or circulation problems.” Exactly how many patients have been killed by the administration of ribavirin remains to be seen.

But there is already proof that patients who avoid such antiviral drugs may have a better chance of surviving the disease. This week, a 95-year old Italian grandmother became the oldest known case to recover from Coronavirus, without the use of antiviral drugs:

“Alma Clara Corsini arrived at the Pavulo Hospital in the northern province of Modena on March 5 after suffering from symptoms of the deadly disease … Gazzetta Di Modena reports that she was able to make a healthy recovery without any need for “antiviral therapy,” while her body showed a “great reaction” despite the infection.”

grandmother


None of these facts have stopped our panic-obsessed media from declaring that “something is going around and you need to be very afraid!” The headlines have only grown more frightening as the crisis continues to unfold.

During an election year when Bernie’s momentum seemed it could seriously threaten the status quo, an unprecedented outbreak coincidentally surged into global mainstream headlines as the only important story in the 2020 news cycle. The panicked broadcasts not only monopolize news coverage, distracting attention away from other important events such as the democratic primaries, but do so during one of the most contentious political climates in written history.

Hong Kong Xi's Dilemma

After over a year of weekly disruptions from the Gilets Jaunes in France, and just as the Hong Kong protests were becoming impossible to ignore; as citizens the world over were waking up, rising up and standing up, the authorities have suddenly announced the end of society as we know it.

The timing of all of this feels particularly convenient for the existing power structure, especially since this is all happening during an election year – an election that many suspect could be suspended under the imposition of martial law.

Since the DNC rigged the 2016 nomination against Bernie (a fact documented publicly by both Donna Brazile and Tulsi Gabbard), voters approached the 2020 election with greater skepticism than normal. And the investigations resulting from that skepticism continue to reveal just how corrupt our system has become. But at the moment when more people than ever before were beginning to realize these truths, the authorities say we must now shut down all congregations and gatherings nationwide…except the election.

As the CDC warned against gatherings larger than 50 people, the DNC continued full steam ahead with a primary vote, where thousands of people stood in line, greatly increasing their risk of not only catching the disease, but of spreading it. Amid the chaos, huge segments of voters did take the CDC’s advice and stayed home and urged the DNC to postpone the vote. But the DNC went forward with the primary anyway. It seems the circumstances of crisis will overwhelmingly favor the status quo to the detriment of the everyone else, once again.

Cognitive dissonance and panic are preventing huge swaths of people from thinking clearly in this moment. The virus may be deadly. But our collective response may prove even deadlier if present trends continue.


Most wage earners in America live paycheck-to-paycheck. And they’ve watched the price of their rents and property taxes skyrocket while wages have flat-lined since the 1970’s. Most of them have debt, either from student loans or hospital bills or credit cards. And in recent years, most of them have begun to realize that the rules of this economic game were already inherently invalid, as evidenced by America’s horrific suicide epidemic and homelessness crisis.

And most working Americans will likely face a difficult situation when rent comes due on April 1st. But it’s the rent seekers who are likely to be the real April Fools when bills come due at the first of the month. According to the L.A. Times, 18% of US workers have lost jobs or hours since the virus. And unemployment has reportedly skyrocketed by 600% in the state of Ohio since the shuttering of restaurants and bars.

As we’ve been reporting for years, the economic situation in America was already extremely precarious prior to this outbreak.

As David DeGraw repeatedly reminded us in the years leading up to this moment, of the 213 million working-age people in America, there were only 100 million full-time workers. This left 50% of the working age population to fight over 28 million part-time jobs. And of what few full-time jobs existed, 47% of them generated annual incomes under $35k.

These data reveal the mathematical impossibility for average Americans to keep up with astronomical costs of living, without accruing ever-increasing levels of debt, that they would never be able to repay because the economic opportunities to do so no longer exist.

So what happens when these already desperate circumstances meet CoViD-19? How are wage earners, living paycheck-to-paycheck, supposed to stay home in accord with national quarantine recommendations, yet continue paying rent? Does anyone honestly believe that our elected Sheriffs will don hazmat suits and enforce eviction notices upon thousands of Americans who can no longer afford their rent, just to appease the greedy slugs of the banker class? Are oligarchs so naïve as to believe that kicking the working class out of their homes is a good idea for maintaining their power?

Mac Slavo opines that this virus will bankrupt more people than it kills:

“The real crisis of the Coronavirus is that it’s going to bankrupt more people than it kills, especially in the United States. Household debt has skyrocketed in the years following the Great Recession, putting many at risk for a financial disaster.

“Businesses are shutting doors and closing shop to prevent the spread of the Coronavirus. But this in itself is a disaster for many who live paycheck-to-paycheck, which is almost 80% of Americans. Not to mention household debt in the U.S. reached a record of $14 trillion in February during the Coronavirus’ spread around the globe.

“CoViD-19’s economic danger is exponentially greater than its health risks to the public. If the virus does directly affect your life, it is most likely to be through stopping you from going to work, forcing your employer to make you redundant, or bankrupting your business.”

The .01% do not care about you. For Wall Street’s financial priesthood, economics are more important than human beings. If that statement seems hyperbolic, here’s an actual quote from CNBC finance:

“The human toll here looks to be much worse than the economic toll, and we can be grateful for that.”

Conservatives Gather At Annual CPAC Event

Larry Kudlow

That’s Larry Kudlow announcing to the world what the .01% really think about the rest of us. At the time he said this, Kudlow was referring to the tsunami that hit Japan following a devastating 8.9 magnitude earthquake. But CNBC has never stopped broadcasting anti-human opinions.  

With regard to CoViD-19, CNBC’s Rick Santelli admits that the value of money continues to outweigh the value of human beings:

“Think about how the world would be if your tried to quarantine everybody because of the generic-type flu. Now, I’m not saying this is the generic-type flu. But maybe we’d be just better off if we gave it to everybody, and then in a month it would be over, because the mortality rate of this probably isn’t going to be any different if we did it that way than the long-term picture. But the difference is we’re wreaking havoc on global and domestic economies.”

Rick-Santelli

Rick Santelli

So what Rick Santelli recommends is a lack of humanitarian response to the pandemic, because it might hurt his stocks. He announced to the world, on network television, in front of tens-of-millions of people, that we should take steps that ensure millions are annihilated in order to save the economy.

This is your brain on capitalism.

almightyMeanwhile, The Federal Reserve has responded by injecting Trillions to prop up banks and multinationals, just like it did in 2008, but without the pesky formality of asking the Congress for it; a clever exception included in the bill from the last round of banker bailouts that ensured bankers would never again be subject to public ridicule for their role in crashing the global economic system and then being bailed out to the detriment of the rest of the people who actually pay for it. And CoViD-19 provides the perfect smokescreen of fear and confusion through which the most eventful weeks in financial history are difficult to perceive.

John Rubino explains why this round of banker bailouts was so predictable:

“Other than the fact that it’s a pandemic popping this bubble, we’re following the script pretty well, in which we have a gigantic financial crisis because of all the debt we’ve taken on, and then the central banks of the world react by flooding the system with cash and bailing out everybody in sight … They know we need a shock-and-awe right now because they know the global financial system and the global manufacturing system are shutting down. So while it’s not clear that there are any financial tools that fix a pandemic, they’ve still got to try. Because the only tools they have are easy money.”

Federal reserve printing so much money debt you'll soon use it for wiping your butt

Whether the coming transformations embrace liberty or tyranny, it seems clear that the rules of the economic game are about to drastically change. For the 80% of Americans who are paycheck-to-paycheck, the coming financial situation may signify a uniquely tragic moment in American history. In response, legislators have begun debating the merits of bailing out the American people, with a $1,000 UBI (Universal Basic Income).

Saagar Enjeti of The Hill explains why such a move is likely to backfire:

“The problem is that a thousand dollars barely scratches the surface. Tens-of-millions of Americans right now are staring down the barrel of rental costs, credit card payments, loans and more. Even direct cash assistance at that level will simply be eaten up by the everyday costs of living that most Americans bear on a daily basis. A one-time cash injection, or even a cash injection monthly, would get eaten up by debt holders in our society. It simply is not going to cut it if we actually want to get our economy working again.

“Or if you want to use this as an opportunity to say that if big business wants our taxpayer dollars, then they have to behave by a certain set of rules. But the political will is not there right now. Sure, we may pass a one-time payment for Americans, but the political resolve will evaporate at the slightest sign of so-called “progress”. We have a template, and even worse, the same people are in charge, with Nancy Pelosi at the helm. And if Joe Biden wins the presidency…he’s literally still defending the Wall Street bailouts that gave them all the short-term capital in the world, while everyday homeowners were completely screwed in the long run. They did the bare minimum and acted like heroes. That’s basically what we’re in for this time around.

“Two subsequent generations of young people are going to enter their adult lives in a catastrophic economic crash. That reveals much more about who has power in this country, and who does not. They’re going to be laden down with debt. They’ll face a struggling economy where jobs with benefits are going to be very, very scarce to come by. They’ll scoff at the idea of owning a house or getting married or starting a family. And they’re going to rage silently inside. And that rage is going to fester as they age. As they start to vote, the rage is just the beginning. And just like that, the debt-laden millennial generation is going to be joined by their younger brothers, sisters and cousins in Generation Z, and they’re going to start embracing revolutionary politics. And it’s going to have a huge impact on the future politics of this country.”

As Yves Smith of Naked Capitalism further explains why the present trajectory of “solutions” actually set us up for failure down the road:

“Even though the Administration claimed they’d get their $1,000 checks out in two weeks, there’s no way that will happen between getting the legislation passed and the operational requirements of printing all the envelopes and checks and getting them out. In 2009, under an Obama stimulus program [checks] took five months to distribute…

“And loans to small businesses? Are you kidding? What small businessman wants to take on more debt when he isn’t sure of his income or even business survival? A few who are in situations where they have genuine reasons to think the Coronavirus impact on them is as blip rather than a body slam might take the plunge, but the rest?”

The absurdity of the situation hasn’t stopped Nancy Pelosi from blocking UBI, or Chuck Schumer from suggesting that the road to recovery involves “low interest loans” for Americans to supply us with the means to survive the crisis. They should be talking about suspending rent and mortgage payments. But neither Pelosi nor Schumer will do that because it wouldn’t benefit their donors on Wall Street. So with his administration now instituting UBI and a moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, Donald Trump now stands to the left of most democrats, presenting as the unlikely progressive hero of the hour.

Additionally, when democrats could temporarily suspend the 2020 democratic primaries, America’s election instead entered the theater of the absurd.

Scott Jarrett, the Maricopa County, Arizona Election Day Director, walked away from the microphone in the middle of a statement during a press conference aimed at providing critical updates to the democratic primary. Jarrett nervously announced the closure of voting locations due to the lack of cleaning supplies necessary for ensuring adequate voter safety during the pandemic. After confirming the reduction of total voting locations to 151 from 229, he turned to a colleague and said:

“I’m sorry. I can’t do this.”

sorry3

Scott Jarrett walking away from the podium

Before walking away, Jarrett began explaining that such a reduction of voting locations would “protect” voters from CoViD-19, even though the move would obviously crowd more people into fewer voting locations. The fact that such a move would likely increase everyone’s susceptibility to the virus may have just been too much for Jarrett to swallow, and he walked away in the middle of his sentence.

Thankfully, his colleague then stepped forward to assure us that all is well, nothing to see here, go on about your business:

“I want to remind the public that the ever-changing world that we live in is creating some stress for all of us, but we just want to make the voters assured that we are going full speed on having a great election as we are tasked to do.”

bernbabyShouldn’t the vote be temporarily suspended along with everything else? Why not institute a system of accountable paper ballots during this, the greatest collective crisis in written history? Such ballots could be mailed, to the relief of poll workers, most of whom are elderly and retired folks — the very demographic most vulnerable to this pandemic.

The CDC says if you’re elderly, or are likely to come into contact with someone who is, you should stay at home, avoid people, and not participate in the vote at this time. But this hasn’t stopped DNC chair Tom Perez from encouraging state officials from moving forward with the primaries.

And Joe Biden joined Perez in encouraging people to throw caution to the wind, tweeting, “If you are feeling healthy, not showing symptoms, and not at risk of being exposed to CoViD-19: please vote on Tuesday.” 

The democratic party is proving they care less about their constituents than ISIS does about their terrorists; ISIS has instructed their members not to travel to Europe, while in America, the democratic party actively encourages people to go out and vote amid a global pandemic.

Indeed, more than 1,600 people, including hundreds of medical professionals, have called for the next round of presidential primaries to be postponed amid the Coronavirus pandemic in an open letter:

“To DNC Chair Tom Perez and Members of the Democratic National Committee, the Secretaries of State of Arizona, Florida, and Ohio, and the chair of the Illinois State Board of Elections:

“The next round of Democratic presidential primaries are scheduled for March 17 in Arizona, Florida, and Illinois, amid a deadly pandemic. This is a dangerous state of affairs. All four states have declared states of emergency or have patients in quarantine in response to the COVID-19 Novel Coronavirus outbreak. On March 14, Georgia moved their primary from March 24 to May 19. Louisiana rescheduled their primary on April 4 for June 20.

“Hundreds are sick and multiple people have died. It has resulted in numerous cancellations and postponements, including presidential campaign events in Cleveland and Tampa. In the swing state of Ohio, the state’s Health Department Director Amy Acton said there is evidence one percent of Ohioans may be carrying the Coronavirus. That means 117,000 may have have CoViD-19.

“A day before the scheduled March 17 primary, Ohio recognized the risks and postponed in-person voting to June 2.

“State officials in Arizona, Florida, and Illinois, with the support of the Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders presidential campaigns, should reschedule the primaries for May, when states such as Indiana, Oregon, and Kentucky have their primaries. Until May, mail-in voting should be implemented throughout under the guidance of health and election authorities.

“We have seen long lines of voters in states like Texas and Michigan. The amount of time standing in line with hundreds or even thousands of other voters substantially increases the likelihood that someone will get sick.

“By postponing primaries, state governments will be able to keep resources focused, and they will not need to worry about the distraction of running primaries while responding to this pandemic. This will also give time for the states to implement alternative voting mechanisms, such as vote-by-mail, at a sufficient scale if the pandemic continues to be an emergency for these states.

“Furthermore, polling place workers, who are generally retired volunteers over 65 years-old, should not need to be exposed to the risk of contracting the Coronavirus while managing precinct locations.

“We should note that we do not believe that a public health crisis or a state of emergency should ever be used as an excuse to cancel elections. The Democratic primary season concludes in early June; the party has full flexibility to schedule state-level races at any point before then.

“In addition to our primary concern about public health, we believe this would be beneficial to the democratic process. As people are understandably avoiding public places and crowds, we expect turnout to be depressed. Rescheduling the primaries would ensure that more people are allowed to exercise their right to vote without fear. It would also be particularly good for down ballot races in the Democratic Party primary. Candidates in city, county, and state races will likely benefit from higher turnout.

“Cancellations and closings help doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals have a chance at saving lives. For the health of our fellow citizens and our democracy, please act now to postpone the upcoming March primaries until May.”

Are Americans are finally beginning to realize that we’re only as healthy as our sickest citizens? When it comes to the 30 million Americans getting through life without health coverage of some kind, Medicare-For-All doesn’t seem like such a bad idea anymore, especially when the alternative means spreading the disease beyond our control. The present level of proposed profiteering feels doubly nauseating when we consider that Polio and Smallpox were cured for free out of respect for the public good. The leaders of the day didn’t worry about “making the vaccines affordable” as Nanci Pelosi recently emphasized, because society used to frown upon profiteering from human suffering.

But today, the phenomenon of disaster capitalism has become the economic norm.

disaster

Desperate times make for desperate measures, and many people were already in financial dire straits prior to the hysteria. Millions of Americans were already resorting to strange extremes to pay their bills before this crisis hit. Many sought refuge in the so-called gig economy of Uber and Lyft. Some gravitated toward donating plasma to pay their rent. Others dipped into black markets to make ends meet. And still others fell into perpetrating scams on the vulnerable.

But right now, opportunists from coast to coast are attempting to profit from the manufactured shortage of critical supplies. And many of those opportunists aren’t members of the .01%. Because it wasn’t the billionaire-class looking to make a few extra bucks by hoarding and selling toilet paper, soap, immune-support supplements, surgical masks, food, etc.

As greedy and selfish as this behavior may be on an individual level, it’s our blind faith in the almighty “Market” that keeps many of us from ever comprehending the notion that an injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Case in point, it doesn’t matter how many bottles of soap I have if my neighbors can’t wash their hands. Because if they get sick, the chances increase that I will also get sick.

Of course, in an economic situation where the future accepted value of US dollars seems dubious, the purchase of toilet paper may indeed seem like a wise, last-minute currency transfer for those with the resources to buy it and stash it. Who knows how valuable such commodities will become in the absence of a functioning fiat currency? But the hoarding of toilet paper also indicates that even citizens of modest means are attempting to profit from the crisis.

Robert Anton Wilson termed this kind of behavior the “Mammalian Hoarding Instinct”.  This instinct is greatly exacerbated by the fact that the economic mantra of capitalism imposes an “every man for himself” mentality onto society at large. Normalizing a business climate of “dog-eat-dog” has disproportionately rewarded the behavioral patterns of sociopaths for decades. This economic system actually rewards sociopaths who naturally rise to the top of such ruthless competition, because we live in a system that actually rewards failure, incompetence, and criminality.

As Ida Bae Wells tweeted this week:

When you are indoctrinated into a belief that being American means only looking out for yourself, that your success or failure is only about you & your own individual efforts, that everyone else sinks or swims on their own, then when we most need each other you still act accordingly.”

Resource hoarding may be a predictable aspect of societal panic, but Covidiots attempting to profit from a toilet paper shortage appear especially pathetic when we consider that toilet paper is not a product America imports from overseas. As confirmed by the New York Times last week, “The vast majority of toilet paper consumed by Americans is made in North America.” America’s very own Koch Industries are responsible for manufacturing the overwhelming majority of America’s paper products through Georgia-Pacific.

As reported by Forbes:

Georgia-Pacific, the paper-products giant owned by Koch Industries, which makes the AngelSoft and Quilted Northern brands, tells Forbes the current toilet paper spike is as much as double its normal demand. The Atlanta-based company says it’s working through its existing excess inventory and increasing production at its existing facilities in order to meet consumer demand.”

But how long are we to expect this global shutdown to last? Are we being eased into full out Martial Law, one incremental step at a time? It starts with frenzied fear-mongering on the nightly news. Then the restrictions start coming down incrementally, starting with travel restrictions and border closures, followed by voluntary quarantines and business closures, ultimately to be followed up by mandatory quarantines that are likely to last months, if not years, if not forever.

But when the Trump Administration invoked unprecedented wartime authority under the auspices of the Defense Production Act, and the Justice Department asked Congress for the ability to detain people indefinitely without trial during emergencies, effectively suspending habeas corpus in the most brazen power grab since the USA PATRIOT Act, it is the US Constitution being placed under quarantine.

John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute provides a more precise analysis:

“We’re talking about lockdown powers (at both the federal and state level): the ability to suspend the Constitution, indefinitely detain American citizens, bypass the courts, quarantine whole communities or segments of the population, override the First Amendment by outlawing religious gatherings and assemblies of more than a few people, shut down entire industries and manipulate the economy, muzzle dissidents, “stop and seize any plane, train or automobile to stymie the spread of contagious disease,” reshape financial markets, create a digital currency (and thus further restrict the use of cash), determine who should live or die…Specifically, the DOJ wants to be able to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial. The DOJ also wants to be able to pause court proceedings and suspend the statute of limitations on criminal and civil cases. Both signify a clear violation of every right espoused in the Constitution, including habeas corpus.”

Such authoritarian overreach is already in progress, as evidenced by military and police personnel going door-to-door in Rhode Island to “hunt down” New Yorkers seeking refuge.

We’re told that these measures are only “temporary” because incrementalism is the name of the game. If the authorities told us the truth, the resulting backlash would be impossible to contain.

This might lead one to wonder what kinds of planned outcomes this round of disaster capitalism will finally enable, such as the imposition of a cashless economy, the introduction of mandatory vaccinations and the imposition of compulsory identification programs and travel papers.

bill_gates_pandemic

For those already aware of Bill Gates’ fanatic obsession with both population reduction and vaccinations, the Georgia Guidestones aren’t the only indicator of what the elite have planned for the rest of us.

Bill Gates recently participated in an exercise this past October called “Event 201” to appraise society’s readiness for global pandemics:

“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.”

201

Gates is now proposing a national tracking system for CoViD-19 cases. At the same time, Athena Security has announced the deployment of surveillance cameras they claim can “detect fevers in people, and in-turn send an alert that they may be carrying the coronavirus… the alert goes directly to the client.” 

But who exactly is “the client”? And can we really expect this technology won’t be abused by powerful oligarchs with totalitarian  intent?

We’re still a ways off from the probable outcomes that are likely to occur from all of this, but the writing on the wall strongly indicates that the powerful will do whatever it takes to retain their rule.

Georgia-Guidestones-1280x720

The Georgia Guidestones

It isn’t just “crazy” preppers and wacky conspiracy kooks considering these outcomes. As Comedian Dave Smith recently tweeted:

I don’t know if people are overreacting to the threat of the #coronavirus or not. But, People are definitely not reacting enough to the threat of a Great Depression if we shut down the economy, and the dangers of living under a legit fascist state if we accept martial law.”

Caitlin Johnstone corroborates these concerns:

“In my opinion the fears that the ruling class will seize this opportunity to advance preexisting authoritarian agendas are well-founded, and people are right to have suspicions about the official narrative on the origins of the virus.”

Kurt Nimmo elaborates the point further:

“For those able to sidestep the trap of fear-mongering, it is obvious this disease is less of a threat to mortality than the seasonal flu and tuberculosis. CoViD-19’s death rate thus far is minuscule by way of comparison, although the state and its media promise the number will rise precipitously and the only option is to “flatten the curve” by imposing authoritarian mandates, including the imposition of martial law, as is now the case in Italy … Recall Henry Kissinger’s remarks following the LA riots. [He] said under the circumstances of an appropriate crisis, the people will run to the state and beg to be protected.”

And from Alt-Market:

“… there is a reason why the establishment refused to inform the citizenry of the instabilities inherent in the pandemic scenario; the more unknowns there are for the public the more panic will set [in], chaos ensues, and it is chaos that can be exploited to push forward numerous agendas. These agendas include global centralization as well as the erasure of constitutional liberties … The establishment and its defenders will claim that we all “have to make sacrifices” today in order to have freedoms tomorrow, but that’s not how the constitution was designed to work. Our rights are MORE important during times of distress and crisis, for it is in these times that we need to know what we are fighting for, and what we are struggling for. Survival is meaningless if we have to accept tyranny to achieve it … Once governments see a chance to usurp freedoms from the people, they DO NOT tend to give those freedoms back later unless the people become a viable opponent that could bring the establishment down.”

Many have already observed the obvious parallel our present predicament resembles to V For Vendetta, namely, the deliberate manufacture of an engineered bio-weapon to be deployed against the masses as a mechanism of fear to secure political domination.

When William Rookwood meets with Inspector Finch, he tells him to “Imagine a virus – the most terrifying virus you can, and then imagine that you and you alone have the cure. But if your ultimate goal is power, how best to use such a weapon?”

rookwood

Rookwood continues:

“Fueled by the media, fear and panic spread quickly, fracturing and dividing the country until, at last, the true goal comes into view. Before the St Mary’s crisis, no-one would have predicted the results of the election that year. No-one. And then, not long after the election, lo and behold, a miracle. Some believe it was the work of God himself, but it was a pharmaceutical company controlled by certain party members that made them all obscenely rich … But the end result, the true genius of the plan, was the fear. Fear became the ultimate tool of this government, and through it, our politician was ultimately appointed to the newly-created position of high chancellor. The rest, as they say, is history.”

It may be too early to tell whether or not the present circumstances constitute an application of quiet weapons for silent wars. But as Genna Rivieccio notes, “The real telltale sign will be when and how ‘the cure’ is unveiled, and who stands to gain the most from it.”

Cui bono?

He who benefits from the crime is the one most likely to have committed it.

Diligent reporting reveals that some government officials became aware of the gravity of this crisis in advance and quietly sold off their assets while telling their constituents that everything was fine. As Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted:

As Intel chairman, @SenatorBurr got private briefings about Coronavirus weeks ago. Burr knew how bad it would be. He told the truth to his wealthy donors, while assuring the public that we were fine. THEN he sold off $1.6 million in stock before the [market began to] fall. He needs to resign.”

NC senator

North Carolina Senator Richard Mauze Burr

Richard Burr is obviously not the only one who stands to benefit from this crisis, since he wasn’t the only one to be privately briefed. Michael Snyder identified the staggering number of government officials and corporate CEOs who sold off billions in stock holdings and resigned their posts in the months leading up to this crisis:

“In the stock market, you only make money if you get out in time, and many among the corporate elite seem to have impeccable timing… And it turns out that several members of Congress were also selling stocks just before the market went nuts. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California and three of her Senate colleagues reported selling off stocks worth millions of dollars in the days before the coronavirus outbreak crashed the market, according to reports.”

More than 1,400 CEOs sold off stocks and resigned in the past year, including the CEOs of United Airlines, Alphabet, Gap, McDonald’s, Wells Fargo, Disney, IBM, Harley-Davidson, T-Mobile, LinkedIn, Mastercard, Salesforce, Credit Suisse, Hulu, Under Armour, PG&E, Kraft Heinz, HP, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Warner Bros., Best Buy, New York Post, Colgate-Palmolive, MetLife, eBay and Nike, just to name a few.

According to NBC (from November 2019):

“Chief executives are leaving in record numbers this year, with more than 1,332 stepping aside in the period from January through the end of October, according to new data released on Wednesday. While it’s not unusual to see CEOs fleeing in the middle of a recession, it is noteworthy to see such a rash of executive exits amid robust corporate earnings and record stock market highs.

“Last month, 172 chief executives left their jobs, according to executive placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. It’s the highest monthly number on record, and the year-to-date total outpaces even the wave of executive exits during the financial crisis.”

Clearly the .01% have access to a very different information stream than the rest of us. Historically this is not exceptional, since insiders have always quietly exited the market prior to cataclysmic societal shifts. And the mass exodus seems to always signal that these events are anything but accidental or random.

But such shifts are not limited to profiteering. This crisis also seems to further America’s ongoing hostilities around the world.

It’s “Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq” all over again in 2020 as the US Naval Armada stands poised to strike against the oil-rich country of Venezuela. The US Department of Justice incited Venezuela’s legitimately elected president, Nicolás Maduro, on charges of narco-terrorism, designating him kingpin of the Cartel of the Suns. Besides the fact that no one had ever heard of this cartel prior to the banging of war drums, Venezuela’s proven oil reserves are recognized as the largest in the world, totaling 300 billion barrels as of 2014. But the fear of the virus provides the perfect cover for starting a war.

The fact that Iranians seem disproportionately vulnerable to CoViD-19, seems highly suspicious. America’s continuous, ongoing animosity toward Iran has not only resulted in the recent drone-killing of Iran’s most powerful and popular military leader, but also crippling economic sanctions against Iran. Given that America and Israel attacked Iran with the STUXNET computer virus, the fact that Iranians account for nine out of every 10 CoViD-19 cases in the Middle East suggests the possibility that this virus may be a kind of biological STUXNET. If nothing else, they’re capitalizing on the crisis in the most cruel way imaginable.

Now that Iranian officials have publicly referred to this outbreak as possibly the “product of an American biological invasion”, the likelihood that this virus may be the product of deliberate engineering to be used as a biological weapon may be a hypothesis worth investigating.

It’s a well-documented fact that the US military has employed biowarfare research since the 1950’s at facilities like Plum Island off the coast of Massachusetts, where Lyme Disease appears to have originated.

As reported by Melissa Dykes:

“… researchers at Plum Island were experimenting with hundreds of thousands of hard and soft ticks on Plum Island where classified top secret biowarfare research was being carried out by the U.S. military for decades and the first outbreak of Lyme happened right directly across the sound less than nine miles from Plum Island where thousands upon thousands of birds fly …  the U.S. government denied that there were any biowarfare experiments on Plum Island for decades … up until documents proving otherwise were published by Newsday in 1993.”

Professor Francis Boyle, Author of the US Biowarfare Act, uncovered four separate studies which he said confirm ‘smoking gun’ evidence the Wuhan Coronavirus known as CoViD-19 was in fact weaponized [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].

And Chinese scientists also found that CoViD-19 did not originate in Wuhan seafood markets as many outlets have claimed:

“The study published on ChinaXiv, a Chinese open repository for scientific researchers, reveals the new coronavirus was  introduced to the seafood market from another location, and then spread rapidly from market to market.”

Then this sobering video appeared on twitter, revealing a highly suspicious geographical coincidence:

“China is a very large country… and in this mammoth-sized country, right here sits Wuhan where the outbreak was. Well isn’t it interesting that the actual Wuhan virus research institute is right here, and right here, only 20 miles [away] is the fish market … Boy, the chances are just incredible.”

 

0003

As Truth Theory reported last month, there are a few journalists, politicians and scientists who believe that the Coronavirus could have originated in a bio lab in Wuhan. A paper published and later deleted by Chinese scientists Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao, said that the virus “probably” originated from one of two labs in Wuhan.

“We noted two laboratories conducting research on bat Coronavirus in Wuhan, one of which was only 280 meters from the seafood market. We briefly examined the histories of the laboratories and proposed that the Coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory,” the paper said.

Beyond the controversial speculation about where this virus came from, we can observe numerous instances of predictive programming in pop culture that have set the stage for society’s acceptance of sweeping government overreach justified by a worldwide pandemic, above and beyond films like Contagion and V For Vendetta.

Astute readers may observe an even stranger parallel to a Dean Koontz novel published in 1981 called The Eyes of Darkness, wherein an engineered virus called the Wuhan-400 escapes from a facility in Wuhan, China:

“A Chinese scientist named Li Chen defected to the United States, carrying a diskette record of China’s most important and dangerous new biological weapon in a decade. They call the stuff ‘Wuhan-400’ because it was developed at their RDNA labs outside the city of Wuhan, and it was the four-hundredth viable strain of man-made microorganisms created at that research center.”

“Wuhan-400 is the perfect weapon. It afflicts only human beings. No other living creature can carry it. And like Syphilis, Wuhan-400 can’t survive outside a living human body for longer than a minute, which means it can’t permanently contaminate objects or entire places the way anthrax and other virulent microorganisms can. And when the host expires, the Wuhan-400 within him perishes a short while later, as soon as the temperature of the corpse drops below eighty-six degrees Fahrenheit. Do you see the advantage of all this?”

kootnz

It’s no secret that global population reduction is explicitly desired by the ownership class, so much so that over the last few years we’ve witnessed a dramatic increase in predictive programming to these ends. The most obvious example of which seems to be the recent Marvel adaptation of a supervillain named Thanos who is obsessed with creating a utopian society “free from suffering” by eliminating half the total population.

intro-1564425786

Thanos accomplishes this with the combined powers of stolen Infinity Gems which he uses to annihilate half of all living creatures in the universe. Thanos’ simpleminded (and profoundly hypocritical) reasoning leads him to believe that the cause for all suffering in the universe stems from too many people clamoring for limited resources. Never mind the fact that artificial resource scarcity is the driving force behind capitalism. Never mind the fact that the hoarding of said resources by wealthy elites to the deprivation of everyone else causes tremendous suffering. And never mind the fact that if Thanos was really sincere in his belief that overpopulation is the prime cause for suffering, he could lead by example and destroy himself as well (which he doesn’t).

Taken as a piece of entertainment, the film seems a harmless philosophical meditation. But when the likes of Forbes start publishing articles entitled, “Is Thanos Right About Overpopulation In ‘Avengers: Infinity War’?”, we might pause and consider what the elites have planned for the rest of us.

But the foreshadowing of current events hasn’t been limited strictly to only fiction and metaphor. Sylvia Browne outright predicted this present predicament over a decade ago, foretelling of a pneumonia-like disease that would proliferate around the globe in the year 2020. As Joe D’Amodio reports:

“People are starting to talk and wonder about the bold prediction made by psychic Sylvia Browne in her 2008 book called End of Days: Predictions and Prophecies about the End of the World, when she wrote about a sickness like the current Coronavirus.

“In that book, Browne wrote: ‘In around 2020 a severe pneumonia-like illness will spread throughout the globe, attacking the lungs and the bronchial tubes and resisting all known treatments.’”

But whether or not CoViD-19 will resist all known treatments remains to be seen. As doctors and scientists scramble for treatments to the disease, we’re hearing now that chloroquine phosphate, an antimalarial drug, has a certain curative effect on CoViD-19. As reported by Melvin Sanicas this week:

“Chloroquine was selected from tens of thousands of existing drugs after multiple rounds of screening, Sun said. According to her, the drug has been under clinical trials in over 10 hospitals in Beijing, as well as in south China’s Guangdong Province and central China’s Hunan Province, and has shown fairly good efficacy.

“In the trials, the groups of patients who had taken the drug have shown better indicators than their parallel groups, in abatement of fever, improvement of CT images of lungs, the percentage of patients who became negative in viral nucleic acid tests and the time they need to do so, she said.

“Patients taking the drug also take a shorter time to recover, she added. Sun gave an example of a 54-year-old patient in Beijing, who was admitted to the hospital four days after showing symptoms. After taking the drug for a week, he saw all indicators improve and the nucleic acid turn negative.”

chloroquine-phosphate-tablets-ip-250-mg-500x500-1

Predictably, the manufacturer of Chloroquine, Rising Pharmaceuticals, attempted to exploit this disaster by jacking up the price of Chloroquine by 98% as soon as it seemed profitable to exploit this corner of disaster capitalism. But since CoViD-19 stands as effectively the only news story on earth right now, the collective reaction from the internet caused Rising to immediately rescind the price increase.

Intravenous Vitamin C has also shown promising results in reducing severity of symptoms in those affected:

“The administering of 1,500 milligrams of intravenous Vitamin C is over 16 times the recommended dietary allowance of the antioxidant, but has resulted in patients treated with the vitamin faring “significantly” better than those patients who aren’t receiving the treatment”

Of course, none of these recent developments have stopped officials from pursuing the “rapid development” of a CoVid-19 vaccine. As political pressure for a “cure” intensifies, experienced scientists and researchers warn that vaccines can not only take years to develop, but that rushing the process can actually make the disease worse. As Reuters reported this week:

“Studies have suggested that Coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a Coronavirus vaccine.

“Normally, researchers would take months to test for the possibility of vaccine enhancement in animals. Given the urgency to stem the spread of the new Coronavirus, some drug makers are moving straight into small-scale human tests, without waiting for the completion of such animal tests.

“‘I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,’ Dr Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters.

“Hotez worked on development of a vaccine for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), the Coronavirus behind a major 2003 outbreak, and found that some vaccinated animals developed more severe disease compared with unvaccinated animals when they were exposed to the virus.”

There are still other factors to consider regarding the development of a vaccine. Yves Smith explains:

“The Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team report … not only does it remind us that a vaccine is at best a year to eighteen months away, but it also points out that new vaccines often don’t have great efficacy. And the Wall Street Journal reported that Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, lauded for their early and effective responses to the Coronavirus, are now seeing a second wave of cases … “As many experts pointed out, the number of deaths resulting from an economic depression would be worse than from the Coronavirus itself. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin told senators that refusing to take forceful enough action could lead to 20% unemployment.”

JP Sears sarcastically reveals another sobering reality about the rapid development of the proposed Coronavirus vaccine:

“We’re hoping and praying that a drug company coincidentally comes out with a vaccine that’s somehow magically created with long-term studies to show it’s safety and efficacy against the Coronavirus within the next few months. Such a vaccine would be rapidly sold to hundreds-of-millions of people around the world, and it would also make the months of panic and sensationalism by the news outlets look like they were in, on the most deceptive yet elaborate marketing scheme the world has ever known, even though that’s definitely not going to be the case.

“Given that the news is honest 100% of the time and doesn’t have a vested interest in spreading fear like a virus to boost its ratings and ad revenue, is it safe to say that the news is being honest this time as well? Yes it is.”

Meanwhile, the global media reaction feels like nothing short of blatant psychological warfare.

If quelling panic were really the goal, why are media organizations resorting to the implicit sensationalism and catastrophism that now encourages the masses to exhibit a myriad of irrational behaviors?

As Jon Rappoport attests:

“There are statistical vampires at work, using the elderly and sick and dying to feed numbers to health agencies around the planet. Those agencies tap their press contacts, and horror reports emerge, and the unsuspecting public, in economic lockdowns, sit in front of the tube and watch these reports, and inhale the cooked-up fear.”

All day long, as the fear of the Boogeybug is hypnotically blasted into our retinas, the bombardment of survival signals begins corrupting our reason and robbing us of our common sense.

And as JP Sears says, those who fail to properly bow before the altar of fear may be purged from society:

“Henceforth, all who do not enthusiastically participate in the wide-spread panic about the Coronavirus, will be known as virus sympathizers, and it’s logical to deduce that all virus sympathizers want you to die from the virus.”

“Are there steps you can take to protect yourself from the Coronavirus? Yes. We’re recommending everyone practice agoraphobia, which means, you don’t leave your home because you’re afraid something bad will happen. But also the Coronavirus is probably already in your home, so be scared when you’re there as well.”

Incidentally, a great way to weaken your immune system is to remain in a fear/stress state. Anyone who has ever been a university student knows that the week after finals, everyone gets stick. That stressful week of tests and deadlines wears down the immune system. Sickness inevitably follows, not because of the strength of any particular virus, but due to individual susceptibility.

prof_robert_sapolsky_4.1395271385Indeed the chronic stressors associated with poverty are noted as significantly lowering immune response, not because of access to health care, but because of the myriad stressors associated with poverty. That is to say, if you want to stay healthy, never-ever make the mistake of being poor. Dr. Robert Sapolsky notes: “One of the really disturbing findings out there in public health is never ever make the mistake of being poor, or being born poor. Your health pays for it in endless sorts of ways: something known as the ‘health socioeconomic gradient’. As you move down from the highest strata in society, in terms of socioeconomic status every step down, health gets worse for umpteen different diseases. Life expectancy gets worse. Infant mortality rate – everything you could look at. So a huge issue has been why is it that this gradient exists? A totally simple obvious answer which is ‘if you’re chronically sick, your not going to be very productive, so health causes, drive socioeconomic difference.’ Not that in the slightest, on the very simple level that you could look at the socioeconomic status of a 10-year-old and that’s going to predict something about their health decades later. So, that’s the direction of causality. Next one – ‘Oh, it’s perfectly obvious! Poor people can’t afford to go to the doctor; it’s healthcare access.’ It’s got nothing to do with that because you see these same gradients in countries with universal health care and socialized medicine. Okay, next simple explanation: ‘Oh, on average, the poorer you are the more likely you are to smoke, to drink and all sorts of lifestyle risk factors.’ Yeah, those contribute. But careful studies have shown that it explains maybe about a third of the variability. So what’s left? What’s left is having a ton to do with the stress of poverty. So the poorer you are, starting off being the person who is one dollar of income behind Bill Gates, the poorer you are in this country on the average, the worse your health is. This tells us something really important: the health connection with poverty? It’s not about being poor, it’s about feeling poor.”


The captains of industry figured out decades ago that they could maximize profits by outsourcing American jobs overseas. They figured out that they didn’t have to pay their workers, but could instead loan them the money they need to survive, with interest that must be paid back. They figured out how to make products break down as quickly as possible, thus necessitating the consumption of greater quantities of the same goods. And they figured out that with enough technological development, human workers are obsolete.

In a technologically advanced society, incrementally fewer workers are required to produce ever-greater quantities of goods and services for the general population. This phenomenon has been termed “Technological Unemployment,” and is not, theoretically, a bad thing. Technology has freed a large segment of our population from menial, meaningless, repetitive tasks (such as assembly lines) which slowly and methodically drain the life force and spiritual essence from human beings. Technology has the capacity to free us from this monotony.

The problem is that our society is still driven by a monetary system, and without these meaningless jobs there is no way for the average human to obtain the necessities of life (food, water, housing &c.) which become commodities for sale. If the population’s only ability to obtain money to afford the necessities of life is by working a “job,” and there is less and less need for such a work force within the overall system, then eventually the system must choose one of two endgame outcomes: change the rules of the game, or execute large numbers of “useless eaters,” so that the game may continue within its orthodox paradigm and managed by its present ownership.

hopkins

An important question to ask yourself is what do these scary red bubbles actually signify? Each bubble represents the total number of cases per country, but this virus is more than four-months into its spread now. So how many of these cases are still active? The way these statistics are being presented feels deliberately misleading.

There are silver linings to this catastrophe.

Yesterday Montana’s Chief Justice Mike McGrath issued an incredible directive asking judges to review their jail rosters and release, without bond, as many people as possible from Montana’s correctional facilities, “especially those being held for non-violent offenses.”

McGrath, Mike

On the ecological front, the contamination of our natural environment has also slowed. Since China isn’t burning as much coal, the Beijing skyline is visible for the first time in many years, as air pollution in China has dropped dramatically.

This also means that many factories are no longer churning out endless assembly lines of plastic garbage, 99% of which inevitably ends up in our landfills within six months of manufacture. Since big business saw it profitable to move manufacturing overseas, literally everything is made in China. For the past several decades, Apple and Nike and all the other major players have profited handsomely from the enslavement of children who must expose themselves to toxic agents for pennies-an-hour. And because these corporations were trying to save money, they skimped on quality as much as they could. Most products today are deliberately designed with planned obsolescence in mind, deliberately undermining every aspect of manufacturing to produce a product that breaks down and falls apart as quickly as possible, without the consumer losing faith in the brand as to prevent the purchase of another obsolete replacement.

With the wheels of this ecocidal machine grinding to a halt, humanity has finally given nature a chance to recover. This trend was further evidenced by the resurgence of wildlife in Italy, where dolphins, swans and fish have reappeared as the murky waters and smoggy skies have cleared.

dolphinsinvenice-header

This seems like good news for human health, because we too require clean water and clean air for strong immune systems.

Additionally, this crisis has emphasized self care as a priority, and shown us that there are many practical measures we can all take to steel our immune response — measures that, for whatever reason, the CDC will never suggest:

As with any crisis, your best chance of survival is to first remain calm. Remember that immunity is more dependent upon susceptibility than exposure.

Fear greatly contributes to susceptibility. Let love guide you, not fear. Because our health is greatly affected by the prison of the fear state. We’re not built to withstand fear as a perpetual way of life, since such chronic stress elevates our cortisol levels which prematurely ages our bodies and makes us more prone to disease. The toll of CoViD-19 of the human body can only be worsened by the health impacts of chronic anxiety, despair and panic.

 Breathe deeply and relax. And let love guide you, not fear. Because fear isn’t just the mind killer; it’s also the immune killer.

bio a

Gabrielle Lafayette is the executive producer for the Outer Limits Radio Show. This cache of thought is presented free of charge as a service and gift to you. May our eternal vigilance help liberate all beings from the smoke-and-mirrors deceptions of the Samsaric Panopticon.

KBGA Censors Outer Limits, Then Lies About It

During a KBGA board meeting in early March, Missoula Current owner Martin Kidston marched onto the University of Montana campus, stormed into the University Center, swung open the door to KBGA’s offices and barged into the meeting, barking baseless threats of lawsuit against KBGA’s student staffers. Kidston then whined about information that didn’t even broadcast on KBGA’s airwaves  and left his business card on the table, ostensibly to show us all that he really means business.

IMG_0722

Apparently Martin Kidston thought Missoula’s college radio station was somehow responsible for outing him as Montana’s Gomer Pyle, or for revealing his characteristic errors and outright fabrications that earned him that title in the first place. It seems as though Martin “Gomer” Kidston thinks that free speech rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment only apply to him, and him alone, but with none of the caveats or consequences associated.

Gomer’s temper tantrum made us wonder why such a prestigious publication like the Missoula Current would lower itself to bullying volunteer DJ’s at a nonprofit College radio station. And how is it that a former Marine could be tough enough to withstand the Crucible, but just too much of a wussy to deal with the honest criticisms of his own bumbling blunders?

e407be7c044bf552b8778df6670a5121

They say you’re not supposed to punch down, and one wouldn’t think that criticizing one of Missoula’s only two newspapers would qualify as punching down. The Missoulian and the Current both represent establishment viewpoints. But Kidston reveals himself to be such a petty nincompoop on such a regular basis that one almost feels bad condemning his false facts, revealing his fabricated quotes and laughing at his unhinged conspiracy theories.

Almost. That is, until you realize how Gomer weaponized his publication by deliberately misquoting people, stretching events, and sinking to outright libel, in order to spin a narrative favorable to those who benefit from Missoula’s ongoing gentrification nightmare.

gomerOld “Gomer” was at it again this March. Only this time he resorted to intimidating some college kids to make himself feel better. And who can blame him? Who doesn’t threaten children from time to time to blow off some steam? It sure can make a man feel powerful. There’s a very special high that comes from the fear radiating off of terrified youngsters. But I hear that the taste of their terror is especially sweet when your threats aren’t even based in reality. Bon Appétit, Kidston.

Point of Order: KBGA has never aired anything libelous or even critical of Kidston, either during the Outer Limits broadcast or otherwise. As the Outer Limits has taken this story, we respectfully protected KBGA from any potential backlash by preemptively leaving these stories off of their air waves entirely. Indeed, Kidston may be offended by content offered on this website that reveals beyond a reasonable doubt what a lying hack he really is. But said content has little to do with KBGA, as none of it has ever appeared on their airwaves.

Perhaps Mr. Kidston was unaware that our editorial team is separate from our performance team. We have writers and we have actors. And the members of our team that handle the KBGA broadcast are not the same folks publishing content, nor are they the same folks writing said content. This fact was grossly overlooked by both KBGA staff, as well as the deranged goofball who threatened them.

Regardless of these inconvenient facts, Martin “Gomer” Kidston demanded the names and phone numbers of the Outer Limits team. Thankfully, our station managers had the good sense not to provide that kind of information to such an overbearing lunatic without our consent.

cribbageNevertheless, Gomer’s threats and intimidation sufficiently frightened the impressionable kiddos currently staffing KBGA. And the anxiety-driven confusion now clouding their judgement has caused them to preemptively pull the plug on the Outer Limits Saturday afternoon broadcast indefinitely.

Evidently, the mere threat of hypothetical cases seems to be all it takes to kill a radio show with no questions asked. Not because someone has sued, but merely because someone might.

How could Gomer’s fear-mongering overwhelm KBGA’s reason like this?

Because Kidston seems to know that the University’s policy with lawsuits is always to settle. Always. Lawsuits hurt the University’s enrollment, especially if ongoing, and it’s much cheaper in the long run to just settle and concede, no matter what the plaintiffs allege. Remember how the University rolled over and paid Jordan Johnson $245,000 merely for threatening lawsuit?

But what could have ever possessed Gomer to freak out on college kids with such threats?

Perhaps Mr. Kidston felt irritated after he himself was threatened with a defamation lawsuit last week for publishing outright fabrications in his Missoula Current. As we reported last week, Matt Wardell was blatantly libeled by Kidston when the Missoula Current attributed statements to him that were never made:

“One of those speakers, who has protested during public comment several times in recent weeks, admitted that he too has made a threatening video. Like Bryant, he also contends his video was taken out of context by what he described as a digital stalker.”

Current PRE-Redaction

OK Gomer

It strains the brain to ponder how Kidston could write such incoherent nonsense, especially when you see what Wardell actually said during the meeting in question:

I want to start by saying first, nothing I am saying here, or ever have said, or will say here, publicly, privately, anywhere, should be taken as a call to violence of any kind. I’m a person of peace. I’m a Christian. I’m committed morally and spiritually to nonviolence.

I also want to address, because I’ve already heard from Mr. Rynearson, the guy whose video led to my friend’s arrest, he’s been looking through my stuff. So I want to let you guys know I’m chronically ill, I’ve dealt with addiction, I hope it isn’t used against me.”

There is nothing about Wardell’s public comment from 24 February 2020 that could even remotely be construed as an admission of making a threatening video. And yet, that’s exactly what the Kidston piece insinuates. And even though he didn’t put his name into print, Wardell knew right away who Kidston was talking about. It was obvious to anyone who attended the meeting, and especially infuriating for Wardell.

Wardell promptly threatened to sue Kidston and the Missoula Current for this brazen attack, a fact that he vocalized at the following Monday’s Council meeting:

Last week I came and professed a spiritual commitment to nonviolence, and before I had returned to my seat, I was accused of levying a personal attack, by a man who now won’t even look me in the eye. And the next morning I found in the Missoula Current, an article saying that I had confessed to sending the video that Brandon was arrested for.

I was mortified! I ran to my computer and I looked up the video, thinking I had terribly misspoken somehow. Nothing in my statement could be construed as a personal attack or an admission of any kind by anyone with even a basic grasp of the English language, unless they had intentionally misheard me.

I came to talk about shared definitions and mutual understandings so that we could build a basis to move forward. And I am afraid now. I’m afraid because there are things just blatantly made up about me and put out in the press. I had to call and threaten this man with a lawsuit to get him to retract. He did quickly. I think he knew what he’d done.

I want what’s right for this town. I don’t have a fortune to protect or to grow. I want to build a family here, not a business. I don’t have money to make. I’ll leave you alone. Please leave me alone.”

wardell 2 mar 2020 b

Matt Wardell at City Council, 02 March 2020


Wardell’s pleas echo a ripple of fear currently spreading throughout Missoula, that citizens who speak out against local government are unscrupulously punished for doing so.

And speaking of being punished for speaking the truth, we return now to the story of how KBGA muzzled the Outer Limits. Because the censorship did not begin recently. It began over a month prior to Gomer’s campus rampage.


On 04 February 2020 we were alerted via Email by the KBGA Program Director of another smear piece written by Kidston, this one against drone whistleblower Brandon Bryant. The Email read as follows:

“A new article from the Missoula Current has been brought to my attention recently. In it a fellow named Bradon [sic] Bryant was mentioned, and after looking at this social media, we noticed that he may be tied to you, your show, and the station in some way. Before KBGA comes out in a statement in regards to his actions towards City Council members, I wanted to contact you to get more information about your connections with Brandon, if he has been on the Outer Limits, and the extent he has been on our air waves. Feel free to let me know and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best,

Natalie Schmidt
Program Director
KBGA College Radio”


Outer Limits responded in kind:

Brandon Bryant is the Air Force drone whistle blower who appeared on our Veteran’s Day program last November.

I wasn’t aware of this Kidston piece, but after reading it, it seems extremely unbalanced – it starts with a smear right off the bat, that Bryant “claims to be an Air Force veteran.” Good God, I’ve seen him on Democracy Now! and BBC Hard Talk and the UN.

Let me dig into this and I’ll get back to you with something more later this evening.”


After being made aware of these developments, we went to work, not only to investigate and report, but to prioritize this story in place of our regularly scheduled broadcast. KBGA staff effectively tasked the Outer Limits team when Program Director Natalie Schmidt directed our attention to the “new article from the Missoula Current” because Gomer’s errors and inconsistencies were just too blatant to ignore.

The Outer Limits endeavored to de-escalate the situation by debunking the blatant character assassination of a man who many see as an American hero: internationally acclaimed drone-war-crimes-whistleblower, PTSD-afflicted veteran and Missoula TIF-abuse-opponent, SSgt. (USAF Ret.) Brandon Bryant. Like Wardell, Bryant had become a vocal critic of Tax Increment Financing schemes at Monday night City Council meetings. And also like Wardell, his character was smeared by the Missoula Current on behalf of the wealthy cronies exposed to this new wave of citizen criticism.

However, numerous troubling elements regarding Bryant’s situation immediately reveal themselves in the aforementioned Email. From a perceived social media association between Brandon Bryant and The Outer Limits, KBGA staff decided to inform us that Bryant was banned from campus. But the Outer Limits does not have a significant social media presence.

Regardless, this question is completely irrelevant to The Outer Limits as Bryant is not, and has never been, a member of our crew. So why inform us of this at all?

KBGA staff requested we muzzle this, the biggest local news story of 2020, due to concerns of political retaliation by local officials who have a history of abusing their power. We understood those concerns and continued to honor the station’s preference to “hold off” the broadcast.

Unfortunately, while such considerations indeed seem legitimate, their necessity simultaneously illustrates precisely why this information is so important to get into the public eye to begin with. Because Bryant is but the latest casualty in a long line of political abuses that are allowed to continue city wide. And they’re only allowed to continue because of the local media blackout that actively prohibits any critical coverage of said abuses or officials. Since the closure of the Missoula Independent, political watchdogs have been put on the endangered species list here in the Zoo, further allowing and encouraging the cancer of corruption to continue its metastasis unchallenged.

The Outer Limits was one of very few outlets remaining in Missoula’s dismal media landscape with any traction to meaningfully challenge these political and informational monopolies. Maybe our commitment to the truth has painted a target on KBGA’s back, but that isn’t any reason to stifle the First Amendment. The freedom of speech is the freedom to offend. End of story. That’s why it’s first. Priority number one of our Bill of Rights is our freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition.

We are tasked by duty to get the story right, which we have, unlike other local media outlets such as the Missoula Current. When militarized police mobilized the downtown lockdown of 12 February 2020, the Outer Limits reported that the broken window was likely the result of a spontaneous shatter event, which it was, while other publications actively sought the invention of a mass shooting hoax. And when local media were already accusing Brandon Bryant of firing shots at the police, the Outer Limits again set the record straight, illustrating the clear impossibility of such a scenario. And now that Martin “Gomer” Kidston has done exactly what we predicted would happen, smearing more local activists with even more lies and fabrications, the Outer Limits rests its case.

Unfortunately, some seemed willing to publish any rumor they heard, no matter how ludicrous, the most egregious example of which took place at the Hellgate Lance:

Brandon Bryant, the cause of all of the chaos this past Wed. was arrested and taken into custody on Thurs., Feb. 13… Bryant reportedly shot out the back glass of a police patrol car, fired shots outside of City Hall, and posted a video where he said that he would, “hunt people and exterminate them.”

lance take E

They couldn’t even get the date of his arrest right. And in the blink of an eye, the entire chronology of the downtown lockdown in-turn betrayed Bryant’s entire reputation and history. That it came from a school publication added insult injury, since Bryant’s mother works for Missoula County Public Schools herself.

It’s called following up, kids. You never go with a story that only has one source; that’s propaganda. Many of the above errors could have easily been avoided with a simple phone call to the Missoula Police Department.

Sadly, Missoula’s schools are abysmally underfunded, in part due to the unintended consequences of the taxpayer giveaway scheme known as Tax Increment Financing which deprives school districts of desperately needed funds; the very reason Bryant, among others, was speaking out. Maybe the Hellgate Lance was unable to follow up with the police simply because the Missoula Public School system literally couldn’t afford the phone bill, ironically due to the long-term effects of Tax Increment Financing, which also negatively affect police departments.

Local media outlets have already been forced to concede that the Outer Limits had all of these stories correct from the very beginning, as they have all walked back their previous narratives from their formerly frenzied extremes.

In spite of the fact that our coverage of the Brandon Bryant affair has demonstrated far greater accuracy than most competing “news”outlets, the staff at KBGA just can’t be bothered with the facts. It doesn’t matter that Kidston regularly publishes lies. Nor does it matter that exposing those lies didn’t even involve KBGA’s air. The only thing that seems to matter to KBGA is the fear that Montana’s Gomer Pyle might actually go postal and sue Missoula’s college radio station.

KBGA_Logo_medium

The Outer Limits team have an 11-year history of going well out of our way to protect the interests and reputation of KBGA, prioritizing the good of the station over all else. We regularly veto content based on a wide variety of considerations, both legal, ethical, and moral, including FCC regulations, the business climate of KBGA’s underwriters, and the time limitations of KBGA staff.

So it wasn’t just us who were baffled by KBGA’s extraordinary apprehension surrounding this story. That bafflement is shared by both KGVO and KFGM – two stations that demonstrated the willingness to cover this story with the honesty it deserves.

The preservation of speech rights depends upon people of conscience to publish the truth, no matter how inconvenient it may seem, no matter how uncomfortable it may feel, no matter how unpopular it may be. And there’s a massive cost that we all pay for failing to observe this fundamental law.

As Tavis Smiley brilliantly articulates every January during our annual MLK broadcast, There’s a huge price that our society pays when we ignore our truth tellers.”

It might seem politically wise to congratulate courage retroactively, awarding praise when the possibility for danger no longer exists. But when the instinct for self-preservation dominates otherwise rational thought to the detriment of the good, we can call it out for what it really is: Cowardice.

Defaulting to the path of least resistance does not inspire excitement or solidarity. When push comes to shove, defaulting to the “easy button” can only betray future prosperity. There is nothing whatsoever to congratulate if we don’t take a stand in the moment when it seems difficult to do so. And the thresher of controversy will separate the wheat from the chaff when those committed to truth and justice distinguish themselves from those too afraid to do what is right.

We acknowledge that such courage seems difficult, especially for folks inexperienced in such matters. But this is a critical moment in Missoula’s unfolding history, and one that we may look back on with great regret if we decide that we were able to help change the deadly tide of cronyism, corruption and abuse in the Garden City, but instead chose to do nothing because it seemed the safer choice at the time. There are never any rewards for playing it safe, and those who would sacrifice liberty for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.

And the same forces threatening to bulldoze everything wonderful about Missoula now threaten KBGA, whether station staffers “allow” this story to broadcast on their airwaves or not. Because yesterday it was Brandon Bryant being silenced; today it’s us; tomorrow it’s you.

Apparently KBGA personnel are not allowed to reveal criminally deliberate instances of journalistic malfeasance as perpetrated by the Missoula Current and other outlets who should know better than to propagandize their audience. Apparently we’re not allowed to clear the name of a man facing a politically motivated prosecution. Apparently KBGA personnel are not allowed to broadcast the other side of the story, because evidently the 1st Amendment doesn’t matter. And astonishingly, KBGA staffers maintain that there is no 1st Amendment issue here.

After we were informed of Kidston’s litigious threats, Program Director Natalie Schmidt nervously told us about our upcoming 6-month leave that was later characterized as a “suspension” but never justified with a coherent reason. Schmidt then asked us how we felt about moving our operation over to KFGM 105.5 FM, despite the fact that there is no reason for such a transfer to take place because we’ve done nothing wrong. So we requested a meeting with the board and left it at that.

But the board never got back to us. The silence on Saturday afternoons became too deafening to ignore, and our listeners were becoming increasingly anxious. Some even called the station. And from those phone calls, it was soon brought to our attention that KBGA  staffers were explaining our absence to perplexed listeners by claiming “They quit.”

When we contacted KBGA about this obvious lie, General Manager Elizabeth Wipperman replied: We offered you to stay off the air for three months, and that after that time to come back to the station and discuss where to go from there.” But this is untrue, since the proposed “break” was not for 3 months; we were told to take a 6 month break. And telling us not to air specific content does not constitute grounds for a “break” at all, especially when we’ve never so much as received a disciplinary “write-up” for anything in over 11 years. But rather than meet and discuss the particulars of this situation, KBGA continues to ignore us, pretending this situation doesn’t exist at all. 

This all highlights the unfortunate lack of integrity exhibited by the children running Missoula’s college radio station; children who were all in diapers when we began broadcasting over a decade ago. 

And after 11 years of faithful service and uninterrupted programming characterized by awards and celebrations, Schmidt claims that KBGA’s flagship show simply walked off the job after being offered to take a “break” for no intelligible reason.

One lie on top of another.

IMG_0732

George Orwell defined journalism as the act of printing or broadcasting information that someone doesn’t want disclosed, dismissing everything else as Public Relations. By getting this story wrong, whether deliberately or not, local media make the situation orders-of-magnitude worse than a mere PR problem. In Missoula 2020, A River STILL Runs Through It. Only now that river is called corruption and it is currently in flood stage.

We couldn’t help but wonder, “What would the Missoula Independent have to say about this if they were still around today?” Then came an awful realization: We actually have the Missoula Current to thank for the death of the Missoula Independent.

That’s right. The justification employed by Lee Enterprises to purchase the Independent involved alleging that the existence of The Missoula Current meant that their acquisition of the Independent did not create a publication monopoly in Missoula.

That’s a cute legal defense, and unfortunately for Missoula, a very efficacious one as well. After all, Nick “monopoly” Checota employed a similar justification several years ago when a regional promoter sued him for “anti-competitive practices”, arguing that he used his companies to “eliminate Mr. Checota’s competition in the Missoula, Montana, entertainment market and to profit personally through his closely held entities.”

At the time, Checota cited competing venues that have either since closed down, or are now controlled by him, as clever deflection against monopoly accusations. There’s always  a loophole for those who can afford the lawyers to find it. And in the case of Lee Enterprises, that loophole allowed for a similar elimination of competition. Because just one year after buying it, Lee closed The Independent on Tuesday, 11 September 2018, leaving a giant void where justice and humor once existed.

This now makes two local media organizations killed by Kidston, who has proven himself an effective cat’s paw for Missoula’s ruling elite.

depend

Rest in peace, Indy

With all of these factors considered together, we can begin to understand why some Missoula locals are now discussing an organized boycott of the Missoula Current and their associated supporters:

CURRENT ADVERTISERS

  • Stockman Bank

  • Lambros Realty

  • Southgate Mall

  • 1st Security Bank

  • Clearwater Credit Union

  • Missoula Market Watch

  • Sterling CRE Advisors

  • Birkshire Hathaway (Home Services)

  • INK Realty Group

  • Annelise Hedahl Realty

  • Mountain Line

  • Missoula’s Office City

  • Contract Design Associates

  • 104.5 The U Radio

  • 103.3 The Trail

  • Missoula Community Theater

  • Fish Window Cleaning

  • Painting With A Twist

Some of the Current’s advertisers have already pulled their advertising in advance of the boycott.

Perhaps Martin Kidston should have thought about what it was he was doing before flying off the handle like he did. He would do well to consider his current predicament with caution. After all, he stands to lose much more than we do.

Because here’s the thing, folks: KBGA is already on the chopping block when the University’s FCC license expires in 2021. And the way the University of Montana continues to cancel programs, fire professors and sell off property, hemorrhaging money the whole way through, it doesn’t seem likely they’re going to keep the radio station around once that happens.

Mark our words.

The only thing KBGA has, is its community support. And KBGA stands to lose some of that community support if it decides to lower itself to censoring journalists. We are committed to the truth no matter where it leads. And it saddens us to think that the same can no longer be said of KBGA.

Showing a volunteer the door because someone might sue is like avoiding relationships because you might catch a cold. You can live that way if you like, but everyone else just thinks you’re paranoid.

gettyimages-128614304

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.” ~Albert Einstein

 

Gomer Kidston’s Litigious Threats Have No Legal Standing

We fail to see what Martin “Gomer” Kidston thinks might provide him with sufficient grounds to sue Missoula’s college radio station, KBGA.

It’s true that the Outer Limits have described his Current as inaccurate and at times even referred to his writing as a “fabrication.”

And yes, we also pinned the word “liar” on “Gomer.” What (among other elemental deficiencies) short-circuits any purported pathway to a successful libel action, is the inclusion of the William Skink excerpt in which Mr. Skink’s colloquy with “Gomer,” concerning “Gomer’s” inaccurate reporting of Mr. Wardell’s Monday Council allocution, is recounted.

“Gomer” as much as admits that he made up the Mr. Wardell quotes when he explains that Mr. Wardell’s citizen comment remarks were, in his view, “rambling and incoherent at best”. He just made up what he sort of thought maybe he remembered what Wardell might have said.

He published that deliberate falsehood – as fact.

Sounds like a lie to us.

And one who lies, is after all, a liar.

GomerFace

It is truly appalling that anyone such as “Gomer,” who holds himself out as a journalist, would be so lazy and reckless as to fabricate quotes made to government officials or a government body, particularly when the guess involves transforming the citizen’s pledge of nonviolence into an admission of making terrorist threats against City officials.

Given the highly publicized detention and felony prosecution of SSgt. Bryant on allegation of making terrorist threats  – like Mr. Wardell, a weekly City Council attendee who commented in opposition to misuse of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) – “Gomer’s” gross lack of due diligence and false description of Mr. Wardell’s City Council comments certainly seems likely to damage Mr. Wardell’s community reputation, among those who know of him by sight.

All “Gomer'” had to do, in order to get it right, was to view the video of the meeting readily accessible on demand at no charge to anyone with internet access. Additionally, many readers of the Current regularly notice the factually anemic, personally opinionated and derogatory character of “Gomer’s” articles regarding TIF opponents and other matters. To call the Current a “newspaper” is quite generous indeed.

As we’ve pointed out, it was an incredible lapse in journalistic method, editorial review, and faculty adviser oversight for the Hellgate Lance to publish an article about its lockdown accompanying Mayor Engan’s imposition of Martial Law, in which the student reporter without attribution or minimal investigation, reported as fact the facially false assertion that the rooftop snipers and armored personnel carrier were a defensive reaction to SSgt. Brandon Bryant (USAF, ret.) firing shots at a police car downtown.

In reality, as the Outer Limits reported following examination of publicly-accessible official City emails, SSgt. Bryant was jailed the day before the lockdown, after correspondence between Missoula City Council President Bryan von Lossberg and City Procurator Jim Nugent, for allegedly threatening words uttered by SSgt. Bryant in a Youtube video provided to von Lossberg by a cyberstalker of SSgt. Bryant known as Maj. Richard Rynearson (USAF, ret.).

The film in question, that was sent to the Council was a cut-and-paste collage that was not assembled by the accused, and not sent to the Council by the accused. Nevertheless, local media have recklessly and repeatedly made reference to the “Pick Your Battles” Youtube channel as belonging to Ssgt. Bryant, despite evidence to the contrary, including the address of Bryant’s actual Youtube channel.

But there is at least the mitigating and comforting knowledge that the Lance’s historically inconsistent and catastrophically embarrassing mistakes were the errors of a teenager. In the case of “Gomer'” Kidston, a grown adult, there is no readily apparent excuse. In both episodes, the errors are the results of failures of writers to exercise reasonable due diligence.

Given the youth of the Lance writer, the fact that the writer was personally locked down inside Hellgate High School, and the public confusion and conflation of facts in rumors arising from the persecution of SSgt. Bryant and the commands issued to armed forces the next day from the Emergency Operations Center directed by Mayor Engen, it’s difficult to ascribe more than gross negligence to the Lance reporter’s lack of due diligence.

But in “Gomer” Kidston’s case, we’re dealing with a grown adult who publishes a newsprint and electronic rag that, as we have noted, was deemed bona fide enough to quash a legal challenge to The Missoulian’s acquisition of The Missoula Independent alleging the establishment of a newspaper monopoly in Missoula. The Current reports on all manner of happenings and civic affairs.

If not libeled, Mr. Wardell was certainly held out in a false light by “Gomer’s” lack of due diligence. The omission of his name from Gomer’s article is perhaps the sole circumstance that significantly impedes legal action by Mr. Wardell, though his frequent attendance and citizen comments reduce that impediment by making it more likely that others surmised who the alleged public threat propagator was.

As journalists familiar with New York Times vs. Sullivan, if Mr. Wardell’s City Council commentaries on Monday evenings in Council Chambers broadcast live on Missoula Community Access Television (MCAT) make him a sort of public figure, in order for him to sustain a libel action he would need to prove that the defendant’s allegedly defamatory statement was not merely false, but also was published with actual malice, that is, with knowledge of its falsity and an intent to injure, or with reckless disregard for the truth.

The Outer Limits offers no opinion as to whether Mr. Wardell is a public figure. But one must admit that based on “Gomer’s” admissions to William Skink, “Gomer’s” appalling lack of due diligence certainly emits an odor resembling, at minimum, reckless disregard for the truth.


Turning now to our commentary regarding Kidston that led the paragon of pulp journalism to burst through the KBGA boardroom door like a moronic ghoul from ‘Night of the Living Dead’, virtually every swipe taken at “Gomer” was obvious opinion; items asserted as fact were either matters of public record, or written or oral statements by “Gomer” himself.

Finally, there was lampooning of Mr. Kidston who – by publishing a newspaper featuring his own bylined articles replete with factual, grammatical, and stylistic errors exemplifying editorial incompetence – has by foisting his puppy training aid upon the public, invited the public’s praise or ridicule, depending upon one’s intellectual and political sophistication.

Other statements of opinion (and lampooning) include bestowing the honorific title “useful idiot” onto Mr. Kidston. But who isn’t flattered to be described as useful?

maxresdefault

As for the nickname “Gomer” which we’ve affixed to Current writer-publisher Kidston, it’s our understanding that Mr. Kidston alleges to have served in the Marines. Every Boomer raised in a family possessing an idiot box is no doubt familiar with the affable, optimistic, smiling, vociferous Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C., the lead character in a multi-season sit-com of the same name, featuring the late Jim Nabors in the role of Private Pyle, the goofy but lovable daily headache of hothead Sgt. Carter.

From the imagery of our description of “Gomer” Kidston bursting into the KBGA board meeting, yelling and ranting and threatening attendees, it seems that the “Gomer” nickname for the useful idiot indeed made us guilty of propagating a misnomer, for such brash, churlish, unhinged conduct is the behavioral signature not of Gomer Pyle, but of Sgt. Carter. Perhaps that is at the root of Kidston’s rabid mania, which is certainly understandable. But as mentioned, our focus deviated to Kubrick’s adaptation of Gomer Pyle, since Kidston now bears the responsibility of being exposed for smuggling the metaphorical jelly doughnut of outright libel into the footlocker of his Missoula Current; in this case, the lies and obfuscations he and his advertisers hope nobody else will notice.

But nobody could have predicted the bizarre response from KBGA staff to “Gomer’s” storming of the board meeting. The response by any experienced faculty advisor to a foaming-at-the-mouth bombast making editorial demands and threatening to sue, would be on the order of:

“Your constructive criticism is greatly appreciated. Good day, sir.”

That’s standard response from all editors and publishers of newspapers that adhere to good journalistic practice, such that the editors and publishers unequivocally back up reporters and columnists.

cribbageWhy did the KBGA board members not respond to “Gomer” with “Call tomorrow, make an appointment, and until then get the Hell out of here before we call campus police!”?

Unless the station is totally independent from the University of Montana, the directive to first avoid discussing the Brandon Bryant affair on the air, then to avoid important local issues for two weeks (during the station donation drive), in combination with the “Gomer” boardroom invasion that resulted in the preemptive axing of the Outer Limits broadcast, seems gravely concerning.

As a state entity, the Montana University System is “The State” with respect to the First Amendment and the Montana Constitution’s guarantee of free expression. That is not to say that format is not subject to station management prerogatives, but if the station management is in the hands of university personnel or officials, content-based censorship other than of obscenity or libelous material, raises the specter of constitutional violations. Of course, if a community radio station is a mere tenant of a university campus, the university has the right to decline to renew a lease, etc.

But from a purely journalistic standpoint, what in the actual fuck is going on here? Doesn’t the station administration have a lawyer available to advise whether content is libelous or not? Why is the station administration so sensitive to the complaints of a hack who disparages citizen activists, makes up direct quotes, and can’t handle criticism?

The reference in the letter from station administration referring to complaints from “listeners” is a brazen insult to intelligence. Who exactly are these complaining “listeners?” The listener base of the Outer Limits is, by all accounts, a loyal cult of Missoulians who share the cynicism of the show’s producers and adore the show’s creative satire. Recently, we’ve heard that Nick Checota tunes in as well, and we might easily imagine that the growing listenership might include “Gomer” Kidston, City Council President von Lossberg, legal eagle Jim Nugent, and perhaps even Mayor Engen himself.

Are these the “listeners” who are complaining? It would make sense, since they’re accustomed to the adulation of the many oligarch-serving propaganda outlets posing as news organizations in Missoula.


“HE IS A CONGENITAL LIAR”

If the station is in fact an appendage of the university, it’s possible that the university’s institutional memory still smarts from a libel suit brought 36 years ago against the university, its student newspaper The Montana Kaimin, and its then-editor Carey Yunker.

In an October 8, 1974 editorial, Yunker labeled Madison, the director of the UM print shop, as an incompetent “congenital liar:”

“One of the memos is from Al Madison. His position, director of the University print shop, alone makes anything he would say on the matter suspect. As well, he is a congenital liar, an incompetent whose own operation has lost $103,914.89 in the last four years.”

SINCE1898Madison sued Yunker, The Kaimin, and UM for libel, seeking special, general, and punitive or exemplary damages in the aggregate amount of $102,000.  Madison alleged that defendant Yunker, acting in her capacity as editor of the Montana Kaimin, deliberately and maliciously libeled him by publishing false defamatory statements. Former 64-203, R.C.M. 1947, defined libel, in relevant part, as follows:

“Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing * * * which exposes any persons to hatred, contempt, ridicule,  or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation.”

The defendants moved to dismiss on grounds that Madison had not complied with a Montana statute then in effect that required a person alleging defamation, as a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit, to first demand a retraction, and permitting the filing of a lawsuit only in the event no retraction complying with the statute was forthcoming. The statute, former section 64-207.1, R.C.M. 1947, provided as follows:

“Before any civil action shall be commenced on account of any libelous or defamatory publication in any newspaper, magazine, periodical, radio or television station, or cable television system, the libeled person shall first give those alleged to be responsible or liable for the publication a reasonable opportunity to correct the libelous or defamatory matter. Such opportunity shall be given by notice in writing specifying the article and the statements therein which are claimed to be false and defamatory and a statement of what are claimed to be the true facts. The notice may also state the sources, if any, from which the true facts may be ascertained with definiteness and certainty. The first issue of a newspaper, magazine or periodical published after the expiration of one week from the receipt of such notice shall be within a reasonable time for correction. In the case of radio and television stations and cable television systems a broadcast made at the same time of day as the broadcast complained of and of at least equal duration, which is made within seven (7) days following receipt of such notice shall be within a reasonable time for correction. To the extent that the true facts are, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with definiteness and certainty, only a retraction shall constitute a correction; otherwise the publication of the libeled person’s statement of the true facts, of so much thereof as shall not be libelous or another, scurrilous, or otherwise improper for publication, published as his statement, shall constitute a correction within the meaning of this section. If it shall appear upon trial that the publication was made under honest mistake or misapprehension, then a correction, timely published, without comment, in a position and type as prominent as the alleged libel, or in a broadcast made at the same time of day as the broadcast complained of and of at least equal duration, shall constitute a defense against the recovery of any damages except actual damages, as well as being competent and material in mitigation of actual damages to the extent the correction published does so mitigate them.” (Emphasis added.)

Madison countered that the retraction statute conflicted with the provision of the Montana Constitution, Article II, section 16, guaranteeing every person a speedy and adequate remedy at law for ever injury to person, property or character.

The District Court granted Yunker’s and the other defendants’ motions to dismiss based on Madison’s failure to demand a retraction, and upheld the constitutionality of the retraction statute. Madison appealed to the Montana Supreme Court.

The Montana Supreme Court, in Madison v. Yunker (1978), 180 Mont. 54, 67, 589 P.2d 126, 133, struck down the statute requiring a retraction demand prior to filing a defamation action case, agreeing that it violated the  Montana Constitutional guarantee of a right to speedy judicial remedy for every injury to person, property or character.

Of more relevance, the Montana Supreme Court, realizing that the New York Times v. Sullivan decision of the Supreme Court of the United States imposed certain limitations on defamation  lawsuits under the First Amendment, chose to outline the parameters within which the case was to be adjudicated on remand to the District Court. In so doing, the Montana Supreme Court adopted the defamation standard set forth in New York Times v. Sullivan, and its progeny up to that time, as being required under the Montana Constitution’s free speech, press and expression provision, Article II, section 7, independently from the First Amendment.

One of the principles established in New York Times v. Sullivan is that truth is an absolute defense. Another is that a public official or public figure may not be awarded judgment for defamation absent proof that the defendant published injurious falsehoods deliberately or did so with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity.

Rather than paraphrase or summarize that portion of the Montana Supreme Court’s opinion in Yunker v. Madison, we reproduce it here:

“Having determined that the statute which brought about the dismissal of plaintiff’s suit is unconstitutional, we must send this cause back for further proceedings. In doing so, however, we are obliged to state, for guidance of the District Court, certain restrictions on libel suits and the damages obtainable therein which now apply. In doing so, we can perhaps obviate, or at lease ease, the fears which will rise in the breasts of publishers, editors, and broadcasters upon publication of this opinion.

“Although the United States Supreme Court has recognized that a state may provide for libel suits (Gertz v. Robert Welch Inc., supra), there has been a substantial development in cases from that court which is in itself a protection to publishers because it limits the right to damages. These restrictions on damages are in themselves a deterrent to the barrage of libel suits that publishers might otherwise fear.

“The development begins with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, 95 ALR 1912. There, the United States Supreme Court found that the dissemination of news was so important that news media should be protected from libel judgments, and should also be shielded from their own “self-censorship” brought about by fear of libel suits. The Supreme Court held that a public official could not recover on a claim for defamation unless “actual malice” had been present. Implied or presumed malice was out. “Malice” meant publication of the defaming material with a “knowledge that it was false, or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”. The burden of proof was on the plaintiff to prove that kind of malice with convincing clarity. The court found that the First Amendment permitted, on public issues, vehement, caustic and some and sometimes sharp attacks on public officials.

“In Garrison v. Louisiana (1964), 379 U.S. 64, 85 S.Ct. 209, 13 L.Ed.2d 125, the New York Times rule was extended to a public official’s private reputation, as well as his public reputation.

“In Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts, and Associated Press v. Walker (1967), reported together in 388 U.S. 130, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094, reh. den. 389 U.S. 889, 88 S.Ct. 11, 19 L.Ed.2d 197 (1967), the court extended the New York Times rule to public figures. “Public figures” are defined in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., supra:

‘For the most part those who attain this status have assumed roles of especial prominence in the affairs of society. Some occupy positions of such persuasive power and influence that they are deemed public figures for all purposes. More commonly, those classed as public figures have thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved. In either event, they invite attention and comment.’ 418 U.S. at 345, 94 S.Ct. At 3009.

“Finally, in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., supra, the Supreme Court, while allowing states to provide for libel suits, erected a fence around the amount of damages recoverable:

‘We would not, of course, invalidate state law simply because we doubt its wisdom, but here we are attempting to reconcile state law with a competing interest grounded in the constitutional command of the First Amendment. It is therefore appropriate to require that state remedies for defamatory falsehood reach no farther than is necessary to protect the legitimate interest involved. It is necessary to restrict defamation plaintiffs who do not prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth to compensation for actual injury. We need not define “actual injury,” as trial courts have wide experience in framing appropriate jury instructions in tort actions. Suffice it to say that actual injury is not limited to out-of-pocket loss. Indeed, the more customary types of actual harm inflicted by defamatory falsehood include impairment of reputation and standing in the community, personal humiliation, and mental anguish and suffering. Of course, juries must be limited by appropriate instructions, and all awards must be supported by competent  evidence concerning the injury, although there need be no evidence which assigns an actual dollar value to the injury.

‘We also find no justification for allowing awards of punitive damages against publishers and broadcasters held liable under state-defined standards of liability for defamation. In most jurisdictions jury discretion over the amounts awarded is limited only by the gentle rule that they not be excessive. Consequently, juries assess punitive damages in wholly unpredictable amounts bearing no necessary relation to the actual harm caused. And they remain free to use their discretion selectively to punish expressions of unpopular views. Like the doctrine of presumed damages, jury discretion to award punitive damages unnecessarily exacerbates the danger of media self-censorship, but, unlike the former rule, punitive damages are wholly irrelevant to the state interest that justifies a negligence standard for private defamation actions. They are not compensation for injury. Instead, they are private fines levied by civil juries to punish reprehensible conduct and to deter its future occurrence. In short, the private defamation plaintiff who establishes liability under a less demanding standard than that stated by New York Times may recover only such damages as are sufficient to compensate him for actual injury.’ 418 U.S. at 349, 350, 94 S.Ct. At 3012.

“In this case, defendants have constantly referred to Madison as a “public official”, apparently to bring this case under the umbrella of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra. We are skeptical that the director of the print shop at the University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, is indeed a “public official”. In Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., supra, it was held that a lawyer was not a public official, although he had taken on a prominent case and was by virtue of his profession an officer of the court. Likewise, it may be contended in the retrial that Madison is a “public figure”. Whatever his status, it is a question for the jury to determine, because of the constitutional provision that the jury under the instructions of the court is the judge of both law and fact. Article II, Section 7, 1972 Montana Constitution. With appropriate instructions,  the jury can determine these matters and their status in any trial, unless otherwise stipulated.

“In this case, therefore, applying the rationale of the cases of the United States Supreme Court on damages for libel, if Madison is considered to be a private person, he must prove: (1) that the published material was false; (2) that defendants are chargeable with fault in the publication; and (3) that actual injury to him ensued, for which he may recover his actual damages. Moreover, (4) if he proves that the publication was made by defendants with knowledge of its falsity or in reckless disregard for the truth or falsities thereof, he may recover punitive damages for such malice, but such malice does not include hatred, personal spite, ill-will, or a desire to injure. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra; Letter Carriers v. Austin (1974), 418 U.S. 264, 94 S.Ct. 2770, 41 L.Ed.2d 745.

“If Madison is a public official or public figure, he may recover only if he proves the threshold fact that the publication was made with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. He could then recover his actual and punitive damages.

“We now, therefore, reverse the judgment and order of dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint by the District Court and remand the cause to the District Court for further proceedings, consonant with this opinion. Costs to the plaintiff.”

So, from that, you can see that if a jury determined that “Gomer” was indeed a liar, that would result in a judgment for the defense and Kidston would take nothing, because truth is a defense to libel.

If the defense of truth was not deemed established by a jury, the next issue involves whether “Gomer” legally qualifies as a public official or public figure. There is nothing to suggest that he is a public official, so the public figure question would be pondered.

It seems inappropriate for us to provide opinions as to whether Kidston likely does or does not qualify as a public figure based upon his actions and publications. But if he were deemed a public figure by the jury, then he would, in order to prevail, have to convince the jury by clear and convincing evidence – a higher standard than a preponderance of evidence (meaning it’s more likely than not), but lower standard than beyond a reasonable doubt – that the defendants published the offensive content with actual malice; that is, deliberately published false matter, or published false matter with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.

“Reckless disregard for the truth” means substantial doubt as to its truth. “Clear and convincing” means that the proposition is “highly probable.” A determination whether actual malice existed would have to be made within the narrow guidelines that the First Amendment and Article II, section 7 of the Montana Constitution permit, on public issues, “vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on public officials and public figures.”

Kidston would then have to prove that he was damaged in his public or private reputation. His life would become something of an open book and witnesses regarding his reputation in the community and/or their personal opinions of his character could be called by both sides. Witnesses testifying to his previously pristine reputation could be asked by the defendants on cross examination questions such as “Have you heard that ___________” (relating some embarrassing event in the plaintiff’s past”). If the witness says “Yes,” it tends to undermine the witness’s credibility, and the same if asked “would you have the same opinion if you knew that ________?” Evidence of the embarrassing past event must be presented.

Assuming that “Gomer” cleared all of those hurdles, and established that he had been damaged, he could seek to recover both actual and punitive damages.

If a jury decided that “Gomer” was not a public figure, then mere negligence would be adequate to find a defendant liable for defamation, but he still could not collect punitive damages unless he proved actual malice (deliberate publication of a defamatory falsehood, or publication of such a falsehood with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity).


cornellbest
Cornell University Law School weighs in on the subject of defamation. Note in particular the narrowed definition of “public figure”:

“…One of the most seminal shifts in constitutional jurisprudence occurred in 1964 with the Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The Times had published a paid advertisement by a civil rights organization criticizing the response of a Southern community to demonstrations led by Dr. Martin Luther King, and containing several factual errors. The plaintiff, a city commissioner in charge of the police department, claimed that the advertisement had libeled him even though he was not referred to by name or title and even though several of the incidents described had occurred prior to his assumption of office. Unanimously, the Court reversed the lower court’s judgment for the plaintiff. To the contention that the First Amendment did not protect libelous publications, the Court replied that constitutional scrutiny could not be foreclosed by the ‘label’ attached to something. ‘Like . . . the various other formulae for the repression of expression that have been challenged in this Court, libel can claim no talismanic immunity from constitutional limitations. It must be measured by standards that satisfy the First Amendment.’ ‘The general proposition,’ the Court continued, ‘that freedom of expression upon public questions is secured by the First Amendment has long been settled by our decisions . . . . [W]e consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.’ Because the advertisement was ‘an expression of grievance and protest on one of the major public issues of our time, [it] would seem clearly to qualify for the constitutional protection . . . [unless] it forfeits that protection by the falsity of some of its factual statements and by its alleged defamation of respondent.’

“Erroneous statement is protected, the Court asserted, there being no exception ‘for any test of truth.’ Error is inevitable in any free debate and to place liability upon that score, and especially to place on the speaker the burden of proving truth, would introduce self-censorship and stifle the free expression which the First Amendment protects. Nor would injury to official reputation afford a warrant for repressing otherwise free speech. Public officials are subject to public scrutiny and ‘[c]riticism of their official conduct does not lose its constitutional protection merely because it is effective criticism and hence diminishes their official reputation.’ That neither factual error nor defamatory content could penetrate the protective circle of the First Amendment was the ‘lesson’ to be drawn from the great debate over the Sedition Act of 1798, which the Court reviewed in some detail to discern the ‘central meaning of the First Amendment.’ Thus, it appears, the libel law under consideration failed the test of constitutionality because of its kinship with seditious libel, which violated the “central meaning of the First Amendment.’ The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with “actual malice”—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.’

“In the wake of the Times ruling, the Court decided two cases involving the type of criminal libel statute upon which Justice Frankfurter had relied in analogy to uphold the group libel law in Beauharnais. In neither case did the Court apply the concept of Times to void them altogether. Garrison v. Louisiana held that a statute that did not incorporate the Times rule of ‘actual malice’ was invalid, while in Ashton v. Kentucky a common-law definition of criminal libel as ‘any writing calculated to create disturbances of the peace, corrupt the public morals or lead to any act, which, when done, is indictable’ was too vague to be constitutional.

“The teaching of Times and the cases following it is that expression on matters of public interest is protected by the First Amendment. Within that area of protection is commentary about the public actions of individuals. The fact that expression contains falsehoods does not deprive it of protection, because otherwise such expression in the public interest would be deterred by monetary judgments and self-censorship imposed for fear of judgments. But, over the years, the Court has developed an increasingly complex set of standards governing who is protected to what degree with respect to which matters of public and private interest.

“Individuals to whom the Times rule applies presented one of the first issues for determination. At times, the Court has keyed it to the importance of the position held. ‘There is, first, a strong interest in debate on public issues, and, second, a strong interest in debate about those persons who are in a position significantly to influence the resolution of those issues. Criticism of government is at the very center of the constitutionally protected area of free discussion. Criticism of those responsible for government operations must be free, lest criticism of government itself be penalized. It is clear, therefore, that the “public official” designation applies at the very least to those among the hierarchy of government employees who have, or appear to the public to have, substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.’ But this focus seems to have become diffused and the concept of ‘public official’ has appeared to take on overtones of anyone holding public elective or appointive office. Moreover, candidates for public office were subject to the Times rule and comment on their character or past conduct, public or private, insofar as it touches upon their fitness for office, is protected.

“Thus, a wide range of reporting about both public officials and candidates is protected. Certainly, the conduct of official duties by public officials is subject to the widest scrutiny and criticism. But the Court has held as well that criticism that reflects generally upon an official’s integrity and honesty is protected. Candidates for public office, the Court has said, place their whole lives before the public, and it is difficult to see what criticisms could not be related to their fitness.

“For a time, the Court’s decisional process threatened to expand the Times privilege so as to obliterate the distinction between private and public figures. First, the Court created a subcategory of ‘public figure,’ which included those otherwise private individuals who have attained some prominence, either through their own efforts or because it was thrust upon them, with respect to a matter of public interest, or, in Chief Justice Warren’s words, those persons who are ‘intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large.’ Later, the Court curtailed the definition of ‘public figure’ by playing down the matter of public interest and emphasizing the voluntariness of the assumption of a role in public affairs that will make of one a ‘public figure.’

“Second, in a fragmented ruling, the Court applied the Times standard to private citizens who had simply been involved in events of public interest, usually, though not invariably, not through their own choosing. But, in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. the Court set off on a new path of limiting recovery for defamation by private persons. Henceforth, persons who are neither public officials nor public figures may recover for the publication of defamatory falsehoods so long as state defamation law establishes a standard higher than strict liability, such as negligence; damages may not be presumed, however, but must be proved, and punitive damages will be recoverable only upon the Times showing of ‘actual malice.’

“The Court’s opinion by Justice Powell established competing constitutional considerations. On the one hand, imposition upon the press of liability for every misstatement would deter not only false speech but much truth as well; the possibility that the press might have to prove everything it prints would lead to self-censorship and the consequent deprivation of the public of access to information. On the other hand, there is a legitimate state interest in compensating individuals for the harm inflicted on them by defamatory falsehoods. An individual’s right to the protection of his own good name is, at bottom, but a reflection of our society’s concept of the worth of the individual. Therefore, an accommodation must be reached. The Times rule had been a proper accommodation when public officials or public figures were concerned, inasmuch as by their own efforts they had brought themselves into the public eye, had created a need in the public for information about them, and had at the same time attained an ability to counter defamatory falsehoods published about them. Private individuals are not in the same position and need greater protection. ‘We hold that, so long as they do not impose liability without fault, the States may define for themselves the appropriate standard of liability for a publisher or broadcaster of defamatory falsehood injurious to a private individual.’ Thus, some degree of fault must be shown.

“Generally, juries may award substantial damages in tort for presumed injury to reputation merely upon a showing of publication. But this discretion of juries had the potential to inhibit the exercise of freedom of the press, and moreover permitted juries to penalize unpopular opinion through the awarding of damages. Therefore, defamation plaintiffs who do not prove actual malice—that is, knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth—will be limited to compensation for actual provable injuries, such as out-of-pocket loss, impairment of reputation and standing, personal humiliation, and mental anguish and suffering. A plaintiff who proves actual malice will be entitled as well to collect punitive damages. …”

amateur

All opinions herein are the opinions of Gabrielle Lafayette, not professional legal opinions. To procure legal advice upon which to rely in making decisions in these matters, one must obtain legal advice from a lawyer actively licensed to practice in Montana, who possesses defamation law competence.

By providing recitation of some general principle and references to, and excerpts from, United States Supreme Court and Montana Supreme Court decisions concerning the law of defamation as shaped by the Montana and Federal Constitutions and a Cornell scholarly article, we’ve simply steered the reader to authorities likely encountered should further review and research on this topic be performed.

Martin Kidston Is Montana’s Gomer Pyle

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This is the story of how Mayor John Engen targeted his political opponents with deadly force during the terrifying military occupation of Downtown Missoula on 12 February 2020, and his propagandist Hatchetman who published the lies that made the siege possible.

The eyes of the world have fixed upon Missoula, Montana. A procedural squabble over the otherwise boring municipal business of Tax Increment Financing has spiraled out of control, resulting in a global outcry against the continued detention of a world-renowned US military whistleblower. Staff Sergeant Brandon Bryant remains in the Missoula County Detention Facility on $100,000 bond, charged with “Threats and undue influence in official and political matters”. As the story dominates local news coverage and citizen dialogue, Missoula officials desperately scramble to control the narrative through their enthusiastic mouthpiece, the Missoula Current, headed by former Marine and useful idiot Martin Kidston. The Current has long been something of a punchline in Missoula’s local journalism scene, but this most recent storm of events has provoked Kidston to release a flurry of articles, showcasing a flabbergasting abandonment of journalistic ethics in favor of blatant fear-mongering and propaganda. He supports his pro-elite, anti-citizen rhetoric with an ever more absurd slew of false facts and authentic conspiracy theories. Kidston’s coverage has become so bad it is no longer hyperbolic to acknowledge that readers of the Missoula Current are actually less informed than those who know nothing.

Bryant’s lawyers appeared twice in Missoula District court to defend their client against a politically motivated prosecution. At Bryant’s arraignment his public defender Robin Hammond asserted that her client’s detention and prosecution violates his rights under four separate constitutional amendments, including, but not limited to, his right of free speech, right to peaceable assembly, right to equal protection under the law, right against cruel and unusual punishment and right against excessive bail.

The free speech argument in Bryant’s case will be obvious to even the most casual of observers. The other violations of his constitutional rights are somewhat more nuanced but all can be plainly understood even by those who don’t speak the truth-obfuscating language of legalese. Importantly, at this moment where his $100,000 bail has been upheld by Judge Shane Vanetta three weeks in a row, the maximum fine for the crime Brandon is charged with is $50,000. His bail is double the amount of the maximum fine allowable under the law.

defenseDeputy County Attorney Matt Jennings insists that the $100,000 bail must be maintained to protect the safety of the Missoula City Council whom Sergeant Bryant is charged with threatening. The monkey wrench in the works of Jennings’ argument however is the inconvenient fact that four members of the Council have publicly stated that they do not consider Brandon Bryant a threat and have explicitly called for him to be released and his charges dropped. One council member, Heather Harp, read a heartfelt letter to Brandon Bryant at the last Council Meeting on 24 February. Before everyone who attended the meeting Mrs. Harp pleaded for Bryant’s release and called for the charges against him to be dismissed. Four days later, three more members of the City Council (the anti-TIF voting block collectively referred to as “Team Liberty”) released their own letter, demanding Brandon’s release and accusing their Council colleagues of encouraging Bryant’s draconian prosecution in order to stifle the growing local outcry against the use and abuse of Tax Increment Financing.

free1

City Council member Jesse Ramos was present in the courtroom during Brandon Bryant’s omnibus hearing on Thursday, 27 February. He informed Bryant’s lawyers that he was there in support of Brandon, a fact highlighted by public defender Jake Coolidge who presented Team Liberty’s letter to the Court. Every soul in the courtroom sat in silence for a few tense moments as Judge Shane Vanetta silently read the letter, which had been written and delivered to Bryant’s lawyers that same morning.

At this time the Court is still awaiting the prosecution’s response to a 28 page motion to dismiss the charges. While every hearing so far has been packed to the gills with precedent-backed arguments against Brandon’s excessive bail, Judge Vanetta has, thus far, been unmovable and inscrutable, maintaining the $100,000 bail pending a mental health evaluation. However, public defender Robin Hammond made several arguments, citing US Supreme Court precedent, that the court cannot legally compel a mental health evaluation, referencing Bryant’s right to privacy and right against self-incrimination.

Bryant’s mother started a go-fund-me campaign: “Freedom For Brandon Bryant” shortly after her son’s arrest in an attempt to raise the money for her son’s bail. His lawyers argue that the excessively high bail explicitly violates his 8th Amendment right against excessive bail.

A cursory perusal of the headlines from local media outlets might seem to indicate that Brandon Bryant’s landmark legal case is not the only news story in Missoula. But a closer reading of the headlines reveals that many of the most shocking news items published recently by local media connect themselves to the Brandon Bryant affair in some way. These items include the ongoing contention over a $16.5 million dollar taxpayer giveaway to Wisconsin millionaire Nick Checota, a highly controversial round of public comment to the City Council on 24 February, and the terrifyingly bizarre lockdown of the downtown area by militarized police originally purported as the result of an armed attack on Missoula Police Officers. The Missoula Police Department have since admitted that their response to the spontaneous shattering of a patrol car’s rear window may have been an overreaction.

On President’s Day 2020, immediately following the publication of our report, “Brandon Bryant Is A Political Prisoner”, Missoula’s local entrepreneurial organization the City Club hosted a luncheon featuring a keynote speech and Q&A with Nick Checota of Logjam Presents, and Jim McLeod of The Farran Group. Checota and McLeod are the chief developers of the proposed downtown “Riverfront Triangle”, and the recipients of the $16.5 million dollar taxpayer giveaway that sparked off the Missoula TIF controversy ultimately resulting in Brandon’s arrest and detention. At the City Club forum, Checota and McLeod gave a presentation detailing their plans for Checota’s “Drift” project, a hotel and condominium tower with attached convention center. Controversy surrounds this project as it constitutes the largest TIF giveaway in Montana State history.

drift

During the presentation Checota mentioned that the construction of the convention center would not have been possible without the inclusion of TIF funds. He stated that despite the runaway success of his entertainment empire, that the financial numbers for the convention center simply didn’t “pencil out”. He essentially acknowledged that a convention center of this sort was unlikely to be a profitable venture, and so the decision to spend millions of dollars of taxpayer money to build such an unprofitable enterprise seems like a poor choice for the City. It is, however, an extremely favorable deal for Checota. He will own the attached hotel and condo tower but the convention center will be owned by the City, with Checota receiving a lucrative deal that gives him exclusive rights to book events there for the next 75 years. The way Checota’s lease agreement is structured with the City, his property taxes for this building will NOT go towards the increased use of police, roads, fire services, etc., but will be instead paying for a conference center over which Logjam and only Logjam will enjoy exclusive booking rights for 75 years. Wouldn’t it be sweet if your property taxes paid for your own mortgage? That’s essentially the deal that Checota has cunningly negotiated with the City, determining where his tax dollars go. Said tax dollars will pay for his conference center; money that would otherwise go toward paying for the government services his project will require.

jamminThis is one of the most blatant examples of privatized gains and socialized losses. As a private business leasing the conference center from the City, Logjam stands to profit handsomely off of its events, but since the City owns it, should it be rendered useless or underutilized as the result of an economic downturn, Checota will be insulated from loss.

The City Club forum is a staple of the Missoula business community, bringing local business people together in one room to hear a keynote speech and then ask questions of a highly successful entrepreneur. However, 2020’s February City Club forum at the Double Tree started off on a particularly discordant note. After introducing the keynote speakers and event protocol, City Club Vice Chair Susan Hay Patrick delivered a stern warning to the audience, alluding to provocateurs who had apparently threatened to disrupt the event:

“You may note the presence of law enforcement today. That’s because we’ve been told that there are some people determined to disrupt today’s forum at any cost. So if that’s your purpose, this isn’t the place for you. And I just want to give you a heads up that if you’re here to disrupt or insult our speakers, we just can’t tolerate that. So if you become disruptive, you’ll be asked first to leave, by me because we paid to rent this space, then by Double Tree staff representing the property owners, and should you refuse to do so, you will be escorted from the room by law enforcement and likely charged with Criminal Trespassing. That’s not the outcome we want, but it is an outcome we are prepared to enforce.”

A palpable fear coursed through the room, populated primarily by affluent business owners, many of whom were previously insulated from the growing local tensions. Susan Patrick has an outstanding reputation in Missoula and she obviously intended to diffuse and minimize potential interruptions to keep the event flowing in good order. But the opening statements had the opposite effect, pouring lots of unintended gasoline on a rapidly spreading fire of indignation and apprehension. Throughout the luncheon, these bizarre threats of arrest hung over the guests, all of whom had paid to attend. Many tables in the crowded convention hall murmured to themselves, escalating tensions and sparking further rumors and speculation by the community; a community where rumors spread quickly according to Mayor John Engen.

Under this cloud of oppressive fear the forum continued almost as-normal. Checota and McLeod presented their plans for the future of the Riverfront Triangle project in the most detailed terms yet. Checota even dedicated the final third of his presentation to addressing “the TIF aspect” of the project which he acknowledged was a highly contentious issue. This basic acknowledgement of the controversy reflects the degree to which the anti-TIF activists have been successful in bringing it into the public narrative. Tax Increment Financing has been heavily used by the City Council and the Missoula Redevelopment Agency (MRA) for years, but in 2020 it has been pushed to the forefront of every municipal debate.

As anti-TIF rabble-rousing escalated following the announcement of Checota’s $16.5 million dollar TIF giveaway, some citizens warned against their contemporaries getting “too myopic about TIF”, advising instead that the underlying principle of income inequality was more important and that the City’s use of TIF was only one aspect of that struggle. However as TIF debate comes more and more into the limelight, the heavy proponents of its use seem ever more reluctant to discuss it. Multiple local media personalities have discussed a frustrating track of events, when TIF dealers like MRA Director Ellen Buchanan are questioned about TIF, their first tactic is to condescend, telling citizens and journalists alike that they just don’t understand the issue.

ellenSometimes active TIF proponents like Ellen Buchanan and Council Vice President Gwen Jones will offer to explain the workings of Tax Increment Financing, but as the debate becomes more and more heated, MRA director Buchanan has become more and more hostile to discussion of her favorite imperfect tool. When approached for an interview about TIF she first expressed frustration, saying she didn’t want to explain it again. When clarified that she didn’t need to explain it, that instead she would be asked to field detailed, educated questions about the use of TIF, she clammed up entirely. It is becoming more obvious with every passing day that those within the City behind the expanding use of TIF just don’t want to talk about it, especially not with anyone who is informed and engaged.

On the topic of informed and engaged citizen attention in city affairs, the 24 February City Council meeting was once again a showcase of the tensions currently gripping the Garden City. It was the first City Council meeting since Brandon Bryant’s arrest on 11 February, and the brief but intense round of public comment spurred yet another controversy in local media coverage, the results of which are still unfolding. A key figure in this round of public comment was one Matthew Wardell. He is one of the many citizens who has been speaking out regularly at Council meetings against the City’s misadventures with TIF, and was prominently featured in a recent NBC Montana piece highlighting the role citizens have had in bringing the issue to the forefront of discussion.

Wardell 4

Wardell is a personal friend of Brandon Bryant, and in the Council meeting prior to Bryant’s arrest he spoke passionately about the injustice inherent in banning Bryant from Council meetings. The source of widespread local outrage comes from the unscrupulous behavior of the aforementioned Missoula Current, a local news publication of little note outside of their recent bombastic attacks on anti-TIF activists, as well as the publication cited in the anti-trust suit that allowed newspaper conglomerate Lee Enterprises to buy up both of Missoula’s main newspapers, the Missoulian, and the Missoula Independent, prior to the shutdown of the Independent. The existence of the Missoula Current was cited as the reasoning for ruling that Lee Enterprises’ ownership of both the Missoulian and the Independent did not constitute a monopoly.

At the 24 February Council meeting (again, the first meeting since Bryant’s arrest) Wardell again spoke with great personal passion. He shared some personal details about his own struggles with chronic illness and the accompanying struggles he’s had with addiction. He said he shared these openly in order to prevent these facts from being used against him, as anti-whistleblower activist Rick Rynearson had been in contact with Wardell and others discussing the issue on social media. Rynearson operates the Youtube channel that hosts the video that led to Brandon Bryant’s arrest.

He has faced numerous accusations for cyberstalking and online harassment. Wardell used his brief three minutes of public comment to publicly and unequivocally state that nothing he has said or will say to the Council should be construed as a call to violence. He went on to share with the Council some of the consequences to members of the community based on their attacks on Sergeant Bryant in local media and Bryant’s resulting arrest.

Wardell concluded his brief comments by reminding the Council of comments made by Council Vice President Gwen Jones who chaired the 10 February meeting. At that meeting, Councilwoman Jones responded to a member of the public who beseeched the Council to help Bryant rather than punish him, assuring the man that “efforts are being made” to connect Bryant with services. As Wardell pointed out, less than 24 hours later Brandon Bryant was in jail, facing a charge that essentially amounts to terrorism.

“Looking to exact undue influence with fear in a political matter,” said Wardell. “The textbook definition of terrorism.” Wardell stared directly at Councilwoman Jones, stating plainly that he and many others are now afraid of the kind of “help” the City Council seems all-too-willing to supply. He concluded his statements with the phrase “we’re afraid of you”.

wardellcouncil1

Matt Wardell on 24 February 2020

Before Matt had even taken his seat, Council Vice President Bryan von Lossberg loudly interjected. “Point of order! Not gonna take the personal attacks on Council members or the inaccuracies around this. So…”

The meeting continued without any attempt by von Lossberg to elaborate what “inaccuracies” he might be referring to. Wardell is unquestionably afraid, as evidenced by his body language and the quiver in his voice. Asserting to a member of the public that plainly stating their own emotional state is an “inaccuracy” would be a stretch even for the out-of-touch leadership of the Missoula City Council, so what other “inaccuracies” might von Lossberg be referring to? To be fair, Gwen Jones did, in fact, claim that efforts were being made to help Brandon Bryant, as seen in the video archived on the City website (start @ 12 minutes).

Point of Order, President von Lossberg: If you are going to accuse your constituents of “inaccuracies” in their public comment, it might be helpful to elaborate. It has seemed abundantly clear for months now that the ordinary practice of the City Council is to habitually ignore public comment, routinely prioritizing procedural norms over public good. In this case, the Council President breaking protocol seems detrimental both to procedural norms and to public good. The public comment portion of the meeting is explicitly set aside for comment by the public. It is a time for them to lend their voice to the proceedings.

The time for general Council comment doesn’t come until the end of the meeting. Emotionally unstable responses from Council that are critical of the public’s right to speak during the time period specifically allotted to them have a chilling effect on the public’s faith in their right to participation that is guaranteed under the law. But considering his other public statements about the detrimental effect that Brandon Bryant’s emotional outbursts have had on proceedings at these meetings, President von Lossberg’s emotional outburst appeared powerfully hypocritical.

No part of Wardell’s comments seem particularly vulnerable to von Lossberg’s accusations of “inaccuracy,” rooted as they are either in statements about his own personal history and mental state, or in recalling and highlighting the words of Council Vice President Gwen Jones at the previous council meeting. So moving beyond Mr. von Lossberg’s unsupported complaint about “inaccuracies,” what, pray tell, are these personal attacks that the Council President must break protocol to defend against?

Does Wardell’s confession that “we’re afraid of you” somehow warrant accusations of personal attack? Clearly Wardell is using his three minutes of procedurally protected public comment to communicate how he feels personally attacked by the actions of the City Council. Has Bryan von Lossberg reduced himself to victim blaming?

Perhaps when President von Lossberg says he “won’t take the personal attacks” he means that he doesn’t want you to personally attack the Council’s ability to throw citizens in jail on politically motivated charges.

In an attempt to refute the widely-held public perception that the City Council provoked Brandon Bryant’s arrest, Councilwoman Stacie Anderson stated:

“It’s really important the public knows that we had absolutely nothing to do with putting anyone behind bars. We don’t have that authority.”

Stacie Anderson’s attempt at obfuscation must be one of the false facts and inaccuracies that Martin Kidston and Bryan von Lossberg seem to be so upset about. After all, Bryant’s trespass order from the Missoula City Council chambers was originally imposed following an Email exchange between Council President Bryan von Lossberg to City Attorney Jim Nugent. This is direct evidence that the Council indeed had something to do with Brandon’s prosecution and arrest, in spite of vociferous deflection to the contrary.

As reported by ABC FOX Montana Thursday:

Indeed, it was Council President Bryan von Lossberg who directed the YouTube video to police, according to court documents.

Earlier this week, von Lossberg told the Missoulian he believed any official involvement in Bryant’s legal process should be left to the county prosecutor’s office.

Council President von Lossberg sent an Email regarding Brandon Bryant to the City Attorney, directly resulting in Bryant’s trespass from Council chambers enforced by arrest should he ever attend Council meetings again.

Matt Wardell’s statements in the City Council chambers that night ruffled feathers outside the City government. By early the next morning a sensationalist article in the Missoula Current was raising eyebrows across the city (at least it would have been if the Missoula Current had anything approximating citywide readership).

A few keen observers noticed a particularly egregious error in the Missoula Current’s coverage of the 24 February Council meeting. Missoula Current editor and reporter-in-chief Martin Kidston tacked a quick smear of Wardell and other anti-TIF activists onto the end of an article about the Council making a non-decision and sending a proposal for a River street warehouse back to committee.

What follows is the original, pre-correction text that appeared in the Missoula Current on 25 February 2020:

Current PRE-Redaction

Monday night’s meeting got off to a rocky start, prompted by public comment rooted in false facts and conspiracy theories, including those surrounding the arrest of a Brandon Bryant – a man who threatened to murder members of the City Council and others.

One of those speakers, who has protested during public comment several times in recent weeks, admitted that he too has made a threatening video. Like Bryant, he also contends his video was taken out of context by what he described as a digital stalker.

He accused the council of trying to make an example of Bryant. But council members unanimously disputed the accusation, saying the Missoula County Attorney alone made the decision to arrest Bryant for threats of murder and intimidation against public officials, as permitted under Montana law.

Those who were physically present for the 24 February Council meeting found it an extremely suspicious assertion that yet another TIF activist made yet another threatening video. The Missoula Current article never mentioned Wardell by name (a libel suit would likely have followed if it had), but based on the other context provided in the article there can be little doubt that Wardell was the next citizen the Current was attempting to implicate for “threats and undue influence in official and political matters”. Seeing as the last person to make a “threatening” video directed at the City Council was currently in jail, this accusation no doubt made Wardell uneasy.

Given this, it seems entirely plausible that writer-in-chief Martin Kidston may be unfamiliar with the concept of irony; a concept explained perfectly by legendary comedian and linguist George Carlin:

Irony is “a state of affairs that is the reverse of what was to be expected; a result opposite to and in mockery of the appropriate result. For instance: if a diabetic, on his way to buy insulin, is killed by a runaway truck, he is the victim of an accident. If the truck was delivering sugar, he is the victim of an oddly poetic coincidence. But if the truck was delivering insulin, ah! Then he is the victim of an irony.

Wardell set out from the beginning of his comments to establish publicly that he had not and would not make any calls to violence or threats. He expressed his fear that his sincere attempts to protect his town from income-inequality producing fiscal policy would result in political retribution against him just as it had against his friend. And in turn, a publication ostensibly dedicated to journalism literally put words in his mouth in an attempt to paint him as someone calling for or threatening violence against the City Council. The Missoula Current’s response to Wardell’s impassioned confession of fear of political retribution involved fabricating comments and attributing them to him in order to expose him to political retribution. Thus, Kidston’s attempt to change Wardell’s comments into an incriminating confession conforms beautifully to Carlin’s explanation of irony.

To say that the Missoula Current distorted Wardell’s words would be inaccurate. The Missoula Current’s coverage of Wardell’s speech was an outright fabrication.

At no point did he say anything that could remotely be construed as a confession to having made a threatening video of his own. Martin Kidston and the Missoula Current have officially gone over to the dark side, abandoning all pretense of journalism and instead embracing their role as propagandists and stenographers for the powerful. This might not actually be so offensive if Kidston’s approach to the whole thing weren’t so ham-handed.

A quick tip in inculcation for you Kidston: you’re supposed to twist the narrative, not make it up outright. That’s propaganda. And when people inevitably see through it, you make both yourself, and the oligarchs you’re trying so hard to serve, appear foolish.

scrips

The irony only grows deeper when one considers the intended affect of Kidston’s lies as compared with their actual result. Since the Brandon Bryant case started generating headlines Kidston’s coverage has been aggressively pro-government. He took hours of citizen comment describing the day-to-day difficulties and indignities of living in a city with the 33rd highest income inequality in the nation, flippantly describing citizens as people who express “disdain over development” and “struggle to find meaningful work”.

As Missoula burns, Martin Kidston fiddles with the narrative. Whatever his intention, the actual affect of his yellow-bellied journalism has only been to isolate and alienate his masters from the subjects they seek to rule. As Council Vice President Gwen Jones prophetically observed during the autumn of 2019, “battle lines are being drawn.”

As the City of Missoula marches to war against their own informed and engaged citizenry, the elites are literally calling in the Marines to control the “battleground”. Much of what most people know about the United States Marine Corps comes from movies like Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece Full Metal Jacket. And in the City of Missoula’s war on whistleblowers, Martin Kidston distinguishes himself as Missoula’s Gomer Pyle, subjecting his neighbors and peers to the unintended consequences of his own thoughtless bumbling.

pylegif

There’s one in every platoon…

But what makes Kidston and Rynearson’s behavior particularly disturbing is the fact  that they themselves are both veterans, cheefully betraying and mocking a fellow veteran who continues to struggle with the blood of our imperialist wars on his hands. This brand of social friendly fire is precisely why many potential whistleblowers remain silent despite acknowledging moral dilemmas and ethical quandaries related to the often questionable necessity of America’s continued military adventurism throughout the world.

Semper Fidelis, Kidston. Perhaps you should remain faithful to the facts next time.

Kidston’s articles have consistently shown a clear dereliction of journalistic integrity and impartiality, omitting even the simple fact that Brandon Bryant is merely accused of a crime, declaring him guilty until proven innocent. The desired affect of Martin Kidston’s coverage has been to smear anti-TIF activists, protect and promote the interests of the Mayor and Council Leadership and sway public opinion against Brandon Bryant.

In effect Kidston aimed to comfort the comfortable and afflict the afflicted. Getting carried away in the current of his own fear narrative, the actual result has further discredited the already shaky reputation of the Missoula Current. Rather than ingratiating himself to his masters in the City government, Kidston has instead spread the taint of his abysmal reputation to those he intended to support. To call Martin Kidston a hack would be an unfair besmirchment to the likes of Kenny Bania.

Kenny Bania

“And what’s the deal with TIF activists? That’s gold, Jerry! Gold!”

After an immediate and appalled response by the community, Kidston has edited his article to remove the fabrication about another citizen producing a threatening video directed at the City Council. However, the fact that the correction had to take place to begin with confirms the warnings of many anti-TIF activists that their fears of systematic and predictable political retaliations are absolutely substantiated. Indeed, Kidston’s coverage of the Brandon Bryant case and the anti-TIF movement has led some Missoula residents to call for a boycott of the Missoula Current’s sponsors, as what remains of the article, post correction, maintains its original tone.


Kidston’s fabrications masquerading as news have actually already made news in Missoula when his blunder was reported on by local poet and political blogger William Skink.

Skink broke the story about Kidston’s fabrication and other conspicuous omissions in the Missoula Current’s 25 February article.

In addition to impassioned public comment, the topic of Brandon Bryant’s detention came up again at the end of the 24 February meeting. During this time Ward 3 councilwoman Heather Harp read a letter to Brandon Bryant that she had painstakingly drafted. In the letter she implores the City to practice compassion and foster understanding and additionally she said that she does not consider Brandon Bryant a threat and called for his immediate release and for charges against him to be dismissed.

Councilwoman Harp has an interesting recent history on the City Council. She was one of the first council members to reach out to the growing community of anti-TIF activists. For her part she has spoken frequently in defense of the City’s use of TIF, but she has distinguished herself from some of her Council colleagues in her willingness to reach out and listen to displeased citizens, attempting to set an example for her peers by engaging in active discourse with citizens who oppose the Council’s agenda.

Unfortunately, her contemporaries have followed a different path. In fact, Councilwoman Harp was recently stripped of her position as Chair of the Administration and Finance Committee. As a career fiduciary, Harp is extremely qualified for this position, as mentioned by fellow supporters, but she was replaced by Council Vice President Gwen Jones. In a rare exercise of candor, Council leadership nominated Jones because of her superior “experience, strategic judgement and collaboration”. They also noted that the Administration and Finance committee is the body that largely oversees decisions regarding TIF funds, and that Council desired someone more capable of “heavy lifting” be the only ones managing the complexities of this highly controversial issue.

Heather

Ward 3 Councilwoman Heather Harp

Despite the Missoula Current’s consistent interest in reporting on the Brandon Bryant case, Councilwoman Harp’s letter received no mention in Kidston’s article on the 24 February meeting, a full third of which dedicated itself to attacking members of the public speaking in favor of Brandon Bryant. But nowhere does Kidston see fit to spill a single word describing the actions of a member of the City Council who stood with those members of the public.

The dry description of the procedural non-event that makes up the first two-thirds of the article has been quickly forgotten by readers and seemingly by Kidston himself as the narrative of a sensational fabrication in the Missoula Current’s reporting and its hasty redaction spun beyond Kidston’s control. As reported by William Skink, when asked for comment on the change in question, Kidston replied:

The comment made at City Council was rambling and incoherent at best, moving between first, second and third person points of view. We simply clarified the graph after the gentleman in question called with concerns over how his comments were reflected in the story as a matter of courtesy. His comments were ultimately rebutted by City Council, and we stand by that reporting. Thanks for reaching out.

Skink’s response and the resulting exchange cannot be improved upon, so it is reproduced here:

Seeing this response I wondered why a “rambling, incoherent” public comment was worth including in the story about storage units, while Heather Harp’s letter stating her opinion that charges against Bryant should be dismissed was not included. So I asked Kidston why the rambling comment was more newsworthy than Harp’s letter, and this is his reply:

“We were there to cover the hearing on the storage project. The only reason the issue of the gentleman’s comment was included in the story was because it received sharp criticism from council members and a short dispute over decorum when it came to voting on claims, as it set a negative tone for much of the meeting.”

While Kidston was busy altering his article before the litigious thoughts of the aggrieved commenter got too far, the Missoulian did run an article on this story, and it’s a good article I encourage everyone to read. Here’s an excerpt

Tuesday, Harp shared the reason she wanted to write the letter. She said she was not defending Bryant’s actions but wanted to treat him fairly.

“When we talk about better outcomes for criminal justice reform — especially for a defendant with mental health issues — it requires a paradigm shift in approach,” Harp said. “I advocate for the most vulnerable amongst us to be treated with compassion and fairness.”

At the meeting, Harp said that although Bryant’s actions caused “fear and intimidation,” she does not believe Bryant is a violent person based on time she has spent with him. But she said “there are times when you say violent things, and that scares people. As a City, we have to respond. We have to act to ensure the safety of our citizens. But we must also act with compassion and fairness.”

Heather Harp’s statements seems newsworthy. I hope Martin Kidston can get around to covering this important development in this, a historically significant case that threatens not only to put a well-known whistleblower behind bars for a decade if he is found guilty, but thereby creating dangerous precedent for 1st Amendment rights down the line.

Skink’s eloquence here stretches back to prophetic statements he made back in early December regarding political retaliations, but there was no way to know that local officials would stoop as far as jailing Missoulians who speak out against the interests of the Engen Regime. Perhaps an important detail of the chronology is the fact that four days prior to Bryant’s arrest the Outer Limits published documents leaked by Brandon Bryant which had been given to him as part of a dossier of documents allegedly proving systemic corruption by the Mayor and his cronies. This dossier was given to Brandon by an anonymous source who claimed to be part of the Mayor’s inner circle.

jailroster

Jailed Drone Whistleblower and Anti-TIF Activist, Brandon Bryant

As media coverage of the Brandon Bryant affair becomes ever more nuanced, coverage in the Missoula Current has instead doubled down on the attacks, targeting citizens opposed to the runaway TIF train and to the politically motivated prosecution of a prominent anti-TIF activist, painting them all with a broad brush as criminals and lunatics. While Kidston’s incredulous smears can be described as ludicrous, unethical and dangerous, they are perhaps connected to the wider attitude of fear and mistrust that injected itself into the veins of this once-quiet riverfront community.

Tensions in the Garden City have been on the rise as quickly as income inequality, and many residents cannot help but see the obvious connection. As the community of artists and free-thinkers that made Missoula great see an autocratic mayoral regime attempting to sell their very homes off to the highest bidder, the citizenry is fighting back, attempting to protect the town they built from an invading army of developers and gentrifiers chomping at the bit to exploit Missoula’s pristine mountains and rivers, rubbing their sweaty palms together as the dollar signs rise into their eyes.


One notable victory for the citizens in the ongoing battle for the soul of Missoula comes in the welcome and surprising news that Missoula’s recently-confirmed new director of development services won’t be taking the job after all. Early in January 2020 the Missoula City council confirmed Josh Martin as their new head of Development Services. Martin was set to make his way up to Missoula from sunny Palm Beach Florida where he planned to smear his gospel of “New Urbanism” all over the face of this riverfront community. Amidst Mayor Engen’s glowing praise heaped on his history of accomplishment in gentrification, Martin promised to streamline the process by which developers would seek approval for large construction projects in the City’s planning bureaucracy. Martin’s tone-deaf promise that under his leadership the City Council approval process would “lead with yes” was met with a less-than-enthusiastic response by those who are skeptical of the City’s development fever. In fact the City Council Committee meeting where Martin was confirmed as director of development services received extensive public comment, all of it opposed to Martin’s appointment.

Public comment was, characteristically, ignored. Martin was appointed to the job and the fight seemed lost, but as reported by William Skink on 26 February, Martin apparently changed his mind. Skink posted this quote from 20 February in the Palm Beach Daily News:

“Two weeks ago the town parted ways with Josh Martin, who resigned as zoning director Feb. 7 after accepting a job in Montana. But Martin, it turns out, isn’t leaving town. He declined the job as development director in Missoula, Mont., he said, and will be working as a consultant, mainly to developer Todd Michael Glaser, on projects in Palm Beach, Miami Beach and elsewhere in South Florida”

Martin

Master of the Municipal Switch-a-roo, Josh Martin

As mentioned, tensions in Missoula over runaway development have never been higher than they are right now. It seems that New Urbanism apostle Josh Martin would rather stay in South Florida than move up to Montana. Perhaps it’s just too hot for him up here…

Thank you William Skink for your diligence and eloquence.

Nowhere have the elevated tensions in Missoula been displayed more prominently than in the dramatic downtown lockdown of 12 February 2020. Following a report by a Missoula Police Department officer that his back window had been shot out during a traffic stop on the 400 block of Woody street in the heart of downtown Missoula, the City’s law enforcement infrastructure sprung into action, blocking roads and sealing off the downtown for over 7 hours as they searched for an armed assailant for which they had no physical description and no physical evidence.

duder

Indeed the de-facto state of Marshal Law throughout downtown Missoula fueled intense speculation, generating suspicion about the stated reason for the lockdown from the very start. And the total absence of any kind of evidence that might corroborate the Missoula Police Department’s original story only intensified the scrutiny. Over two weeks after the incident took place, the MPD finally acknowledged this week what has always been the most likely narrative: that the glass in the patrol car’s back window spontaneously shattered. Thorough examinations including two X-rays of the car found no bullets and no bullet fragments. Many Missoula residents, upon hearing the MPD’s active shooter narrative noted that sometimes auto glass shatters with no discernible cause. Research on the topic reveals plentiful anecdotal evidence of the phenomenon, as reflected in this story from ABC affiliate KTRK Houston:

“All of a sudden we heard a big bang and the glass shattered and we stopped. [I] got out to look to see if anything had hit us and nothing. There [were] no marks, no anything, just shattered glass.”

The Missoula Police Department maintain that their investigation is ongoing, declining to state conclusively that there was no shooter. They have not provided any picture or video of the damaged police car. Many Missoula citizens questioned whether the entire episode might have been an elaborate contrivance, an exercise where the Mayor tested the capabilities of his security infrastructure. It is not inaccurate or disparaging to describe this narrative as a conspiracy theory. It is literally a theory about an elaborate conspiracy. In this case the oft-used moniker is accurate. But if we lived in a world completely free of sinister conspiracies we wouldn’t really need whistleblowers. The fact that whistleblowers exist and that they are so often targets for elimination by the powerful is evidence that SOME conspiracy theories can prove accurate. The point is that the City has thus far been exceptionally tight-lipped regarding all of their shifting theories surrounding the Downtown Occupation, and speculation will continue until evidence is provided to lay those rumors to rest.

One Missoula resident has attempted to secure that evidence directly and legally. J. Kevin Hunt is among the Missoulians openly opposing the city’s highly questionable TIF dealings.

11526558-largeKevin, who grew up in Missoula and attended Rattlesnake Grade School (’72), Hellgate High School (’76) and University of Montana (cum laude, Political Science ’80), was formerly a highly-rated  criminal defense and constitutional lawyer who practiced in Oregon for three decades after graduating from law school there in 1984. Hunt’s practice quickly gained a reputation for representing the defenseless and oppressed, devoting much of his career to representing persons facing the death penalty, in both trial and appellate courts including the Supreme Court of the United States. Every death sentence he challenged was vacated and one client was even freed after five years on death row. Having returned to Missoula in 2018, he intends to be admitted to the Montana Bar by motion within the next year, after reinstating active Oregon Bar membership.

While in Oregon, Kevin co-organized  a citizen group that exposed corruption and abuse in Oregon City’s misuse of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). With former Oregon City Mayor John Williams, Kevin was co-Chief Petitioner for a city initiative drive vigorously opposed by the town oligarchs as well as their Mayor and City Commission minions. His efforts culminated in amendment of the city charter to prohibit bonded indebtedness for urban renewal without voter approval. An unheard of eclectic right/left coalition of Green Party and Americans for Prosperity activists promoted the ballot measure, which brought socialism for the rich to a halt in Oregon City.

Throughout his career, Kevin has been a frequent target of spurious attacks, false indictment and retribution for his justice-seeking activities. He learned the risks of whistleblowing when less than six months after passing the Oregon Bar, he provided classified information to a Congressman regarding fraud against taxpayers being committed by Kevin’s then-employer, a government contractor. Kevin was promptly fired, followed, wiretapped, and falsely accused, by complaint to the Oregon State Bar, of various ridiculous criminal offenses by the international law firm representing the contractor in an effort to set aside the successful unionization drive Kevin also spearheaded. A few months after Kevin beat the law firm in the National Labor Relations Board and was exonerated by the Oregon Bar of the contractor’s serious allegations (in part due to the Congressman writing to the Bar that Kevin’s provision of the confidential evidence of fraud was consistent with his obligation under federal law to “expose corruption wherever found”) the contractor pled guilty to defrauding the federal  government.

Twenty years later, Kevin was a background source for investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, who was at the time writing his best-seller “Chain of Command” exposing the U.S. military’s torture of innocent civilians held captive at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq; the same government contractor was involved in the torture.

Here in Missoula’s present moment, Kevin has sent a number of letters to high-ranking City officials following Bryant’s arrest. One such letter is addressed to Mayor John Engen, Council President von Lossberg, Council Vice President Jones, and Alderpersons. In the letter, Hunt cites Article II, section 9 of the Montana Constitution. The Montana Constitution asserts the public’s “Right to know”, stating that:

“No person shall be deprived of the right to examine documents or to observe the deliberations of all public bodies or agencies of state government and its subdivisions, except in cases in which the demand of individual privacy clearly exceeds the merits of public disclosure.”

Hunt argues that:

“[The] inadequately explained show of paramilitary force, the official justification for which contains assertions by Missoula Police contradicted by citizen photographic evidence and contemporaneous reporting of a Missoulian journalist’s personal on-scene observations, have had a chilling affect on the people’s exercise of two other fundamental rights enshrined in Article II of our 1972 state Constitution”

Hunt’s letter clearly and formally requests information from the Mayor, City Council leadership and newly assigned Missoula Police Chief Jaeson White (who will officially take over the job starting on the first of March). He concludes with the following list of actions that are demanded not by Hunt, but by the Montana State Constitution:

1. Mr. Von Lossberg, Mayor Engen and all Alderpersons: disclose the totality of circumstances under which you became aware of You Tube videos featuring edited allocutions by internationally acclaimed drone war crimes whistleblower, PTSD-afflicted veteran and Missoula TIF abuse opponent Ret. Sgt. (USAF) Brandon Bryant. Specifically, publicly disclose and release the entirety of all communications among you, and between any of you and ex-Air Force drone warrior, Ret. Maj. (USAF) Rick Rynearson, producer of You Tube channel “Pick Your Battles,” said to be a weapon of continuous intimidation of Mr. Bryant casting him in a false light, by featuring out-of-context, edited clips cherry-picked from Mr. Bryant’s personal therapeutic vlog.

2. Mayor Engen, Missoula Police Chief White: disclose the full truth and totality of circumstances surrounding the unprecedented 12 February imposition of de facto Martial Law, including any and all communications evidencing planning of a Feb. 12 exercise, execution of such an exercise under pretense, coordination with Lake County officials regard such an exercise, and any allusion therein to a nexus between the aforementioned Brandon Bryant affair and the referenced events of 12 February.

The inclusion of the connection to Brandon Bryant’s situation will prove significant, not only for Bryant who is still incarcerated and undergoing legal proceedings relating to his charge of “threats and undue influence in official and political matters.” Only time will tell if these legal demands will be addressed adequately or at all. Anyone who has given public comment before the City Council knows how easy it seems to be for them to ignore public comment.

The chilling images of police snipers perched atop the courthouse roof and SWAT teams in armored vehicles rolling down the streets give silent testimony to the shock-and-awe power that can and will be brought to bare against those who threaten to expose Engen’s game. Monopoly of force is a reliable, time-tested tactic of the powerful to assert dominance. But TIF activists who now feel vulnerable in Missoula’s tense atmosphere have never fought with the weapons of war that were employed by law enforcement during the February lockdown.

Leaks within Engen’s camp allege that the Mayor provided law enforcement with Matt Wardell’s description during the 12 February siege, deliberately targeting Missoula’s highest profile TIF activist with deadly force. Caddy Kidston sets up the tee with a little character assassination, and Engen drives it home with arrests, prosecutions, raids and snipers.

TIF activists have only ever fought with their words, satire and art. Now that the MPD has essentially acknowledged that their militarized takeover of the downtown was predicated upon an overreaction, since no armed attack on police ever took place, the fact that the whole fiasco was perpetrated ostensibly to protect Missoulians from a non-existent attacker is cold comfort.

Also troubling to attentive Missoula residents is the considerable price tag for this downtown war game. The overwhelming tactical response unfortunately didn’t come cheap, and between the seven-hour lockdown and the citywide increased police presence that followed, the City racked up a bill estimated at a whopping $1.5 million.

Emergency operations of this magnitude can run a minimum of $100,000 for costs associated with the Fire Department alone, and that’s a conservative projection. Estimated cumulatively, the coordinated response by City, County, State and Federal agencies can cost up to $250,000 per agency depending on the many hidden charges associated with these kinds of logistical concentrations, such as the costs associated with mobilizing and maintaining armored personnel carriers including the activation of special and expensive insurance policies; hazard pay for the paramilitary forces deployed; overtime pay for first responders who were called up from their days off and regularly scheduled shift breaks. Adding all these factors together under the uncertain cloud cast by the City’s opaque bookkeeping, we feel confident that a total cost of $1.5 million is a conservative estimate.

Where else have we seen Missoula drop that kind of money on an oppressive downtown eyesore? None other than the income-inequality generating engine that is Stockman Bank! An institution that received $1.5 million in Tax Increment Financing dollars, buying it’s own bonds and charging the City 4% interest; loaning us their own corporate handout at interest. The downtown lockdown of 12 February 2020 spent a Stockman Bank’s worth of City tax dollars in a single day.

cdffa23f-a7a0-4da6-829c-32d4d4571b5c-large16x9_stockman2Speaking of Stockman Bank, they’ve been grabbing headlines again recently, this time not for their highly irregular $1.5 million dollar TIF handout, but for an unrelated outrage, which is objectively too terrible to be made up. As reported by the Associated Press last month:

“A former commercial loan assistant at Stockman Bank has been sentenced to nearly five years in federal prison for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from the accounts of two customers, including a mentally incompetent elderly man.”

Shawn Al Logan, 31, of Shepherd, pleaded guilty to theft, embezzlement, aggravated identity theft and other charges in October. District Judge Susan Watters sentenced him Thursday to four years and nine months in prison, followed by five years of supervised release.


The emperor’s new clothes are on full display for all to see. The rulers are exposed, and look more and more silly with every new attempt to sweep the inconvenient facts under the rug. The MPD in particular have received extensive criticism over the extreme nature of their response, as well as it’s unintended consequences, which are still unfolding. But when questioned if the lockdown was an appropriate reaction to the perceived threat, Missoula interim police chief Mike Colyer said that he had no regrets about deploying fully armed tactical teams downtown.

“It is all about ensuring safety at that point. The safety, first and foremost, of any uninvolved third party in the area; the safety of our officers to have the right people there with the right training and equipment to handle that mission.”

Coyler 1

I don’t know about you, but when I think of snipers, the first thing that comes to mind is safety. Consider how this event has triggered many Missoula area veterans.  The urban center of our home temporarily resembled horrors witnessed abroad. As a result, many Missoula veterans are reporting increased nightmares, increased anxiety attacks, and increased PTSD symptoms.

What is certain is that all parties involved, both citizen and first responder alike, both civilian and veteran alike, agree this unfortunate overreaction has hurt local morale and regret that circumstances forced this unprecedented mobilization as a necessary procedure. Spontaneous window shatterings are spooky indeed, and could understandably cause a worst-case-scenario reaction in an official trained to deal with such situations.

missoula-police-car-02-12-20

A Missoula Police car being towed away from its downtown location. As yet the City has not released any photos of the rear window of the police car that was allegedly damaged. Photo credit: Edward O’Brien / Montana Public Radio

While Colyer and the MPD have, after long delay, been somewhat forthcoming about the complete lack of evidence to support their active shooter narrative, their positions dictate they play the hand they were dealt. One can hardly expect the interim police chief to state publicly that their armed takeover of the city center violated the civil rights of the public they are sworn to protect, or to throw the Mayor under the bus and pass the blame for such an extreme response.

But Mayor Engen’s role in the management of the downtown occupation should not be ignored. Local media reported in the aftermath of the lockdown that Mayor Engen oversaw the entire response from a fortified command center where he called in City, County, State, and Federal law enforcement agencies, including the MPD, Missoula County Sheriffs, Montana Highway Patrol, FBI, US Marshalls, Department of Interior and even Fish Wildlife and Parks.

With very few exceptions, most movie buffs loudly decry sequels as inherently inferior to originals. One prominent exception is the classic second installment of the Star Wars Trilogy: The Empire Strikes Back. Just over eight years after the October 2011 citizen movement of Occupy Missoula created an enduring presence on the courthouse lawn in protest of systemic income inequality, Missoula has finally debuted a blockbuster sequel: Occupy Missoula II: The Engen Regime Strikes Back.

bvlAs discussed in a previous Outer Limits article, it seems naïve to believe that the Brandon Bryant affair played no role in the intensity of this response, taking place as it did less than 24 hours after Bryant’s arrest. Most Missoulians, including many City officials were unaware that Bryant was already in custody at the Missoula County Detention Facility, allowing speculation to run wild among both citizens and City officials alike that it was Brandon responsible for the “shooting”. The few people in a position to refute these rumors did what they could to quell runaway conjecture, but such a tense and dramatic situation added fuel to the fire that had already been kindled by Council President Bryan von Lossberg and others in their statements about the threatening nature of Bryant’s presence at City Council meetings.

The line between rumors and deliberate obfuscation of the facts became even cloudier when The Hellgate Lance actually put into print that Bryant was indeed the assailant responsible for shooting out the rear window of a police squad car:

HELLGATE LANCE 12 FEB 2020

“Brandon Bryant, the cause of all of the chaos this past Wed. was arrested and taken into custody on Thurs., Feb. 13… Bryant reportedly shot out the back glass of a police patrol car, fired shots outside of City Hall, and posted a video where he said that he would, “hunt people and exterminate them.”

This piece’s author, Maggie Vann, is still a high school student at Hellgate High. She’s young and inexperienced as a journalist, but already picking up bad habits from the wrong crowd. How any editorial board – even at a high school newspaper – could make such damning and egregious errors is already astonishing. But Martin Kidston, a grown man, intentionally fueling the fires of misinformation and adding to the confusion with deliberate propaganda, seems to be the real offender in all of this.

The connection between Bryant and the downtown lockdown persists only in the minds of lazy thinkers. The parallel may have seemed apropos since the events happened more or less simultaneously; Bryant was arrested on 11 FEB and the city went on lockdown on 12 FEB. Even those in the MPD aware of the facts of Bryant’s arrest and detention seemed rather quick to preemptively assume that Wednesday’s apparent “attack” on the Missoula Police Department was armed retribution against Bryant’s arrest, possibly by one of his friends or supporters, possibly even by some of the other anti-TIF activists who spoke alongside him at City Council meetings.

As reported by Montana Public Radio, “Interim Police Chief Mike Colyer said he erred on the side of public safety, even if that meant inconveniencing the public for a while”.

For Missoula’s countless residents who value freedom and safety (or who are simply wary of jumpy soldiers with assault rifles searching door-to-door for an armed assailant for whom they have no physical description) the downtown lockdown likely felt like something more than a mere “inconvenience”. And for those citizens who enthusiastically exercise their right to participate in local government and spoke out against the City’s pro-development agenda, the armed occupation of downtown Missoula felt anything but safe to them.

Part of the City Council’s justification for banning Brandon Bryant from Council meetings in the first place was that angry outbursts like the one he displayed on 18 November 2019 could have the effect of making citizens afraid to come down to Council meetings to voice their opinions. In the wake of Bryant’s arrest and vigorous prosecution, the fear many citizens now have of continuing to raise their voices is more than just a theory. They’ve looked on as public comment regulars stopped showing up to meetings. And on top of it all, Council leadership have been explicitly informed that the citizens feel afraid of them.

Council President Bryan von Lossberg broke protocol during public comment, decrying a clear communication of the fear they have inspired in the public, as a “personal attack”. Where is Councilman von Lossberg’s outrage over the violation of the public trust inherent in an armed occupation of downtown? Where is Councilman von Lossberg’s outrage over the silencing of a decorated veteran who dedicated himself to “eliminating” the grim specter of cronyism from his hometown’s local government? Where is Councilman von Lossberg’s outrage over the dramatic erosion of public trust in the democratic process? One can hardly expect Bryan von Lossberg to feel the sting of these oh-so-personal attacks on the citizenry. After all, he is one of the cadre of despots behind those attacks on the community.

5bf58412063bf.image

Gabrielle Lafayette is the executive producer for the Outer Limits Radio Show. This cache of thought is presented free of charge as a service and gift to you. May our eternal vigilance help liberate all beings from the smoke-and-mirrors deceptions of the Samsaric Panopticon.

Brandon Bryant Is A Political Prisoner

A storm has been brewing in Missoula, Montana. Income inequality city-wide has risen to the 33rd highest in the nation. Tension between the public and elected officials over runaway development and crony capitalism spills into the streets. And a world-renowned United States Air Force whistle-blower is jailed over his political statements to, and about, the Missoula City Council. There is a political prisoner in the Missoula County Detention Facility right now, and his name is Brandon Bryant. The storm isn’t coming. The storm is here.

orange1
Bryant appears via video at his preliminary hearing

On Monday November 18th at the Missoula City Council chambers, a man stood up to address the council during general public comment. He identified himself as Staff Sergeant Brandon Bryant. He proceeded to relate a parable, about a rich man who had 100 sheep, and a poor man who had only one. The rich man observed that the poor man’s sheep was of significantly higher quality than any of his own. So the rich man decided to take the poor man’s sheep, kill it, and serve it to his guests, leaving the poor man with nothing.

A heavy silence hung over the crowded chamber as the officials of the city waited for this life-long resident to continue speaking. After a pause he asked them if they understood the story. His elected representatives did not respond. His next words sparked a fire storm that has embroiled Missoula’s political situation ever since. At the full-volume fitting of a Sergeant, Brandon Bryant bellowed, “YOU ARE THAT RICH MAN!”

As reported by Shannon MacNeil:

“Tempers boiled over at Monday night’s City Council meeting. One resident accused the city of taking from the poor to gild their own pockets.

“You are that rich man,” resident Brandon Bryant said. Mayor John Engen responded, “We are not going to yell in this chamber, sir.”

Then Bryant said, “You need to understand, Mister, what you have done. You have sold out this community — you have wrecked the trust in this community.”

Engen ended the exchange with, “We’re off until you can calm down; let’s take a five-minute breather.”

Bryant replied “You have wrecked the trust in this community!”

At this point the Mayor gaveled the meeting to a close and called a five-minute recess until order and calm could be restored in the chamber.

8f755984-5e4a-4472-9921-c26d6bff4f7e-large16x9_CITYCOUNCILHEATED

The consequences of Staff Sergeant Brandon Bryant’s address to the Missoula City Council that evening have only grown with time. The situation continues to spin into wildly unexpected directions as every action taken by elected officials, and in-turn Missoula’s growing activist community, continues to generate a viral explosion of news and gossip, focusing the eyes of the world on Missoula, Montana once again.

And to think, this all started over Tax Increment Financing.

In October 2019 the Missoula City Council abruptly moved-up a meeting on a highly controversial development project that involved an enormous $16.5 million TIF giveaway for the proposed Riverfront Triangle project. This meeting was originally scheduled for 7:00 PM on Monday the 21st of October 2019. Monday evenings are the regular time for Missoula City Council meetings, when working people are able to attend public hearings and provide public comment. However, Mayor John Engen unexpectedly moved this particular meeting up by five days to Wednesday the 16th of October, rescheduling it from a Monday evening to the previous Wednesday afternoon.

Even the City Clerk was unaware of the reschedule. Mayor Engen stated a desire to “get ahead of the rumors” as reason for secretly precipitating the meeting to a time when most working people would be unable to attend. In fact, only one citizen was present to provide public comment in opposition to the project, which involved a $16.5 million dollar taxpayer handout to one of Missoula’s richest citizens: Wisconsin transplant and entertainment industry monopolist Nick Checota.

nickky
Nick Checota, owner of “Logjam Presents”

Mayor Engen’s pro-development regime leans heavily on the “imperfect tool” of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to fund an ever-growing series of handouts to some of the city’s most successful entrepreneurs.

In brief, TIF is a program where districts of the city are designated as “blighted” thus creating TIF districts where tax funding that would otherwise go to roads, schools, emergency services, etc. are capped at their current levels. As the tax base in that district grows through increasing property values, the additional funds from property taxes are skimmed off the top and put into the TIF fund, which is then awarded to developers for projects meant to address urban blight. TIF districts are meant to sunset after fifteen years, but through various mechanisms City development officials in the Missoula Redevelopment Agency (MRA) can prevent districts from sun-setting and maintain their designation as “blighted” for decades (perhaps indefinitely).

The proposed TIF handout to the already fantastically-wealthy Checota entertainment empire is the largest in the state’s history, at $16.5 million. And as Bob Moore, a CFO for Fortune 500 companies stated in Council chambers last month, “[TIF] is nothing but taking taxpayer money and giving it to developers and builders, and calling it ‘investment’.”

Engen’s indiscretion of moving the meeting to avoid public scrutiny sparked an immediate and impassioned reaction from the community. Dozens of citizens emerged from the woodwork to articulate the well-documented perils of Tax Increment Financing, as well as its correlation with income inequality and trickle-down economics.

City Council member Jesse Ramos was, at the time, the only member of the Council who opposed the rampant use of TIF. But Missoula had an election in the weeks that followed, and the controversy provided Ramos with two anti-TIF allies on the Council. Council members John Contos and Sandra Vasecka were swept into office from a groundswell of citizen support for Team Liberty candidates.

liberty
Contos, Ramos and Vasecka on election night (6 NOV 2019)

Over the following month a diverse collection of citizens began attending every single Council meeting, voicing their disparate perspectives and warning against the consequences of crony capitalism – consequences evident to every Missoulian. Among these citizens was Brandon Bryant, a life-long resident with a family history dating back four generations in Missoula. And from his very first appearance before the Council, he commanded attention and respect.

levitasBryant spoke more forcefully and more passionately than most are accustomed to in these dry proceedings, perhaps because Bryant cut his teeth as an orator on the world stage. As a US Air Force whistle-blower spilling dark secrets about the Pentagon’s drone program, Bryant addressed the United Nations, received a whistle-blower award in Germany, gave a TED Talk in Norway, and was interviewed on Democracy Now! as well as the BBC’s Hard Talk. He’s also been published in Gentleman’s Quarterly, The Sun, The Independent, etc.

 


As citizen awareness expanded throughout Missoula, citizen outrage continued to grow. Brandon Bryant happened to find himself at the forefront of a swelling scandal that was pouring over into Council chambers in the form of public comment. This collective outrage soon grew to the point where meetings that usually took one or two hours were now lasting five hours or more. One particularly well-attended City Council meeting beginning on Monday evening at 7:00 PM lasted until nearly 2:00 AM the following Tuesday.

Meanwhile, all across Missoula, hundreds of posters appeared literally overnight with the newly fallen snow. Masquerading as a missing cat poster, these posters turned out to be an explanation and indictment of the Tax Increment Financing policies running rampant in Missoula’s City Government.


In December of 2019 Bryant posted a video diary to his Youtube page, musing at length about his frustrations, not only with the City Council, but with all the forces he has opposed throughout his career in the military, as well as his life as a whistle-blower and disabled veteran. The contents of that video are impossible to defend. Bryant rambles tangentially and menacingly about spiritual warfare on people and organizations he sees as evil. He vows to destroy those he sees as his enemies.

Kidston1Bryant has tried to explain away these video diaries (which he has been posting on Youtube for years) as merely part of his therapeutic process he engages with as a disabled veteran who received a traumatic brain injury and suffers from intense PTSD. He now cautions viewers that his vlogs are meant to vent his depression and frustration. One of these videos scared the bejeezus out of the City Council, or at least that’s how they tried to play it off after acknowledging the opportunity it presented to finally silence the constant disruptions to their meetings.

It’s important to note in the context of such “threats” that Bryant stated at the 8 January committee meeting that upon leaving the military he had “vowed to never again take a human life”, a solemn oath he swore as a direct consequence of collateral damage he himself was responsible for as a member of the drone program. While this doesn’t stop him from using hyperbolic rhetoric, he hasn’t physically harmed another human since leaving the military.

At the top of the 8 January meeting, Bryant carried a wooden stick to the podium, carved in the shape of a sword. He identified it as a bokken, or wooden practice sword used by Japanese masters to train their skills for the blade. While his purpose for bringing it to the meeting was metaphorical, this decision would come to haunt him in the months to come.

Since the Missoula City Council dodge criticism of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) by leaning on the crutch by admitting it might be “an imperfect tool,” but, they’ll also say, “it’s the only tool we have.” Brandon Bryant announced his intention to rhetorically indict the use of so-called “imperfect tools” with metaphor. 

He compared the wooden practice sword to the City’s TIF scheme.  Bryant claimed that the stick carved in the shape of a sword would be an imperfect tool indeed if required to serve the function of a sword, and he cautioned that the use of imperfect tools could only create imperfect results.

ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com

At the time his speech was greeted with the same kind of bored tolerance that many citizens have come to expect from the Missoula City Council. No tempers were raised at this meeting. No one seemed to feel threatened or afraid. Council members can be seen joking and laughing. The Police officer present at the meeting didn’t bat an eyelash. Indeed, as a disabled veteran with a chronic leg injury, Bryant usually carries a walking stick for mobility anyway. But no one at the time suspected that this address, paired with the previous outburst and aforementioned video diary, would be used to mobilize a political attack on Brandon Bryant resulting in a judicial order excluding him from all City property in his home town.


Enter Rick Rynearson.

rickLike Bryant, Rynearson is also an Air Force veteran who worked in the drone program. Retired from the Air Force as a Major, Rynearson operates his own Youtube channel (“Pick Your Battles“), which for the last year has been dedicated exclusively to showcasing the most shocking and disturbing moments from Brandon Bryant’s video journals. Unbeknownst to Brandon Bryant or any of the other TIF activists in Missoula, Rynearson worked his magic with Bryant’s December video journal, selecting a juicy nugget that suggested Bryant intended to “eliminate” his enemies, including the City Council.

Rynearson then sent his edited version of Bryant’s video to members of the City Council, igniting a firestorm of controversy, the consequences of which are still unfolding.

This latest batch of small-town drama began when Ward 1 Council Member Heidi West and her husband, Adam West, contacted City Attorney Jim Nugent, citing “death threats” from Brandon Bryant. This prompted the City Attorney to restrict Bryant from attending any further Council meetings.

To the passive observer, the controversy ended there. Bryant verbally ceded his role in Council’s public comment observance, subsequently releasing a public statement apologizing for the video in-question, promising that threats of violence against Council members had never been his intention.

Enter Mr. “X”.

Many months prior to these circumstances, during an autumn afternoon in 2019, Bryant was approached by someone claiming to be close to Mayor John Engen. This anonymous individual provided Bryant with a treasure trove of documents, hinting they could prove systemic corruption by the Mayor and his cronies. After he was barred from direct participation in Council meetings, Bryant leaked these documents to the media and they were published online soon after, on February 7th.

At the following Council meeting on February 10th a member of the public spoke to the council, describing Sergeant Bryant’s history and circumstances, admonishing them to help him instead of punishing him. Council Vice President Gwen Jones publicly stated that “efforts are being made” to connect Bryant with services.

But four days after the documents were published, Brandon Bryant was in jail, charged with “threats and undue influence in official and political matters”. A felony. And his bail was set at an absurd $100,000.

Bryant’s extraordinarily high bail of $100,000 has triggered a go-fund-me page promoting his release.

gofundyourself

The page reads:

“On 11 February 2020, Air Force Combat Veteran and Drone whistle-blower Brandon Bryant was arrested on charges of “Threats and Undue Influence in public and political matters” by the Missoula Police Department.  He is currently being held on $100,000 bail despite having no criminal record and being a decorated Air Force veteran with strong ties to the community … We believe his incarceration is politically motivated.”

Brandon Bryant’s arrest came during one of the most intense political periods in Missoula’s history. Controversy over TIF giveaways swelled, in part due to the activism of Bryant and Missoulians like him. Council meetings in the months leading up to his arrest were some of the most heavily attended (and highly entertaining) in Missoula’s history. Media coverage of Council affairs became a routine occurrence. Public attitudes toward the mounting catastrophe of income inequality and crony capitalism approached fever pitch. Under such circumstances the Mayor and his inner circle were feeling immense pressure to swat down citizen efforts that have successfully revealed business-as-usual in Missoula.

And the threat of a leaked dossier making its way into the media’s eye surely contributed to their apprehension. In fact, charges were formally filed by the County Attorney’s Office the SAME DAY these documents were published.

The documents in question, if their providence was genuine, could imperil the careers and future of not just the Mayor and his colleagues, but also the developers and businesses he allegedly received kickbacks from. In short, the stakes were raised and local elites were not comfortable. So it seems they capitalized on the only alternative in their grasp: striking back at the individuals that seem to pose the most direct threat to Missoula’s power monopoly.

Despite public statements by the Council that “efforts are being made” to connect Bryant with services, no member of the Council ever appealed to any veteran’s organization to directly seek those services.

In fact, when contacted directly the day after her public statement that efforts were being made, Council Vice President Gwen Jones disavowed her involvement or responsibility with facilitating that connection. She said it wasn’t her responsibility and she was not involved, instructing interested parties to speak to MPD officer Ethan Smith who was in charge of Bryant’s case.

But it was officer Smith who called Bryant to tell him a warrant had been issued for his arrest on the morning of 11 February 2020, instructing him to turn himself in by 2:00 PM, and warning him that if he didn’t surrender himself to the police that he would be tracked down and captured.

The inescapable message of Brandon Bryant’s arrest suggests this was a consequence of, and warning against, interfering with the interests of the Mayor, the MRA, and the City Council; a message that had most certainly occurred to those who decided to charge him. A charge of “threats and undue influence in public and official matters” is essentially a terrorism accusation: the act of provoking fear to influence public policy.

The fact that Bryant himself never sent his remarks to any members of the City Council was at best overlooked, and at worst, ignored. The individual who sent his edited video to the Council – Rick Rynearson – did so with the intent of provoking fear to influence public policy.

Perhaps the City Council labored under the false apprehension that the Youtube channel hosting the video they were sent was indeed Bryant’s. Upon cursory inspection, that erroneous conclusion would be understandable. In fact, the local newspaper, The Missoulian, reported that the Youtube channel in question (titled “Pick Your Battles”) may have belonged to Bryant. Indeed, the Pick Your Battles Youtube channel posts nothing but clips of Brandon Bryant’s video diaries for the last year. So the idea that it might be his channel may be somewhat understandable. But instead of correcting this misconception, local media chose to lean into it.

However, any close examination reveals the “Pick Your Battles” page can only be the work of someone who is very critical of Bryant’s position. It only posts edited clips featuring the most frightening and unflattering segments of Bryant’s videos, interspersed with negative documentaries and smears of Bryant and other military whistle-blowers. Indeed, the channel has continued posting videos even after Bryant’s arrest, including a new hour-long documentary entitled “Brandon Bryant the Threat”.

While the mistake of conflating this terror-inducing Youtube channel to Bryant may be understandable, it is certainly not forgivable, especially in the case of The Missoulian staff who are ostensibly charged with investigating the truth and reporting in the public interest. Their careless and incredulous coverage of the issues at the root of this case provide aid-and-comfort to an allegedly corrupt government regime who now hypocritically broadcasts threats and undue influence in public and official matters.

Indeed the threat of political retribution had already proven effective against anti-TIF activists even before Bryant’s arrest. The mere suggestion that criminal charges could be leveled against those who stood in the Mayor’s way has already caused some citizens to withdraw their voices from public appearance before the Council. Smears in local media against Bryant have prompted some members of the public to carefully avow that they would never condone, promote or engage in acts of violent rebellion. The jailing of an anti-TIF activist sends shockwaves of fear through the community, leaving many terrified that they will be the next victims of political retaliation by the Engen regime.

This is where this entire story goes completely off the rails.

In the immediate wake of Bryant’s arrest, tensions in Missoula escalate to a new and baffling intensity. On the morning of February 12th – less than 24 hours after Brandon Bryant’s arrest – Missoula is the site of a dramatic downtown lockdown by squads of militarized police. Armored vehicles patrol the streets. Police surround and lock-down the County Courthouse, City Hall and City Council Chambers. Snipers perched atop the courthouse scan downtown in their cross hairs. SWAT teams infiltrate downtown houses and businesses for an alleged assailant for which they have no description and no physical evidence.

 

The Missoula Police Department’s official story for all of this alleges that at around 9:45 AM, an officer was conducting a routine traffic stop on the 400 block of Woody Street, when he reported that the back window of his patrol car had been shot out.

The officer immediately sought cover, called for backup and prepared for an armed showdown with an unseen and unidentified attacker. As the militarized police apparatus thundered into downtown Missoula, a dystopic reality gripped the area. City, County, State and Federal law enforcement held the city center hostage for hours, conducting door-to-door searches for the assailant. But despite their prolonged efforts and overwhelming show of force, no witnesses described seeing a shooter, no shell casings were found at the site, and an examination of the patrol car by police forensics experts found no bullets or other projectiles had entered the vehicle.

5e448f2ccd341.image

After hours of the entire downtown being locked down by SWAT teams, with no suspect and no description of the person who allegedly shot at a police officer in broad daylight, the Missoula Police Department declared there was “no danger to public safety”.

Meanwhile, a disabled US Air Force combat veteran languishes in a jail cell, cut off from his friends, family and medically-mandated service animal. And his bail is maintained at $100,000 because the County Attorney affirms he is a danger to public safety, despite all evidence to the contrary.

Brandon Bryant has no criminal record, is a decorated veteran, and was honorably discharged from the Air Force. And yet the City of Missoula and the Missoula Police Department consider him a threat to public safety, while simultaneously, an anonymous shooter firing at police in broad daylight does not apparently constitute a threat to public safety.

The fact that a documented murderer walked free after only one day in jail further highlights the absurdity of this situation. As William Skink observes:

So, because Brandon Bryant used threatening language that elected officials have interpreted as being directed toward them, he is deemed “a threat to public safety” and thrown in jail.

Johnny Lee Perry, on the other hand, USED HIS HANDS TO KILL ANOTHER HUMAN BEING and he spent exactly ONE DAY IN JAIL before being released back to the streets without ANY CHARGES, felony or otherwise.

The juxtaposition of these two cases is absolutely insane. How is a man who literally killed another person with his bare hands not considered a threat to public safety while a veteran whistleblower who used threatening language is allegedly so threatening he deserves to sit in jail on $100,000 bond?

Welcome to destination Missoula.

Nearly a week after this intense and dramatic show of armed military force by City, County, State and Federal law enforcement agencies, no new information has been released. The story dominated headlines across the board the night of the lockdown, but has since disappeared completely from the banner, without any successive followup by local media.

Meanwhile, Wednesday’s frightening spectacle continues to capture the imagination of the public, sparking speculation and outrage from all quarters. That speculation ran rampant during the initial hours of the tense “standoff” at the forefront of which was uninformed conjecture that Brandon Bryant was himself responsible for the alleged shooting.

A City Council committee meeting was in session at the time of the alleged shooting, just a block away, and was part of the lockdown. Considering the arrest of an internationally prominent whistle-blower for allegedly threatening the City Council just one day prior to all of this commotion, it would be naive to assume that the special security detail assigned to the Council Chambers during the lockdown was not aware of the circumstances of Brandon Bryant’s arrest. In fact, numerous in-person interviews and social media conversations taking place during the lockdown speculated that Bryant was indeed the shooter. Only a few participants knew that Bryant was already in the Missoula County Detention Facility, but had little ability to restrain the rumors intimating Bryant’s involvement.

In the absence of any official explanation of the incident, the community is left to speculate about a complex story with little more  than convoluted and incomplete information. One of the most simple and innocuous explanations seems relatively plausible; that something other than a firearm caused the officer to overreact, and in order to avoid embarrassment after setting off such an extreme chain of events, he has resolutely stuck to his lone-gunman story.

Indeed the only evidence that the Missoula Police Department offers to corroborate a shooting at all is the officer’s testimony that his back window was “shot out”. No physical evidence authenticating these claims have been announced. Quite the contrary, in fact. The Missoula Police have themselves stated that no bullets or projectiles were found in the car, directly refuting the assertion that the window was shot out.

As reported by The Missoulian:

Investigators immediately sealed up the patrol vehicle involved and will soon conduct a search of the car, Welsh said. At the time of the press conference, Welsh said a bullet or projectile that fractured the patrol car’s window had not been found. Still, police had gathered enough information to believe it was gunfire that set off Wednesday morning’s events.

It is true that some witnesses downtown reported hearing what they described as a single gunshot. However, despite the panic-driven rumors that multiple shots were reported at the time of the incident, no witnesses have stated they heard anything more than a single report. It is possible that the officer heard a car backfire and mistook it for a gunshot. It is also possible that the rear window of his squad car spontaneously shattered.

As many drivers can attest, car windows can spontaneously shatter, an occurrence that can be extremely startling. But as many car owners know, car windows sometimes explode without being struck by any object, without the car being in motion, and without any perceivable provocation. This could very likely have been the case. But the deafening silence confirms that officials are sticking to the official narrative: that the officer’s back window was “shot out” even though there isn’t a shred of physical evidence to this end, and the “suspect” is still at large.

Other speculation about the causes of this bizarre incident grow ever more sinister. A video surfaced on Twitter of a police car being towed out of the downtown area hours after the lockdown began. Seeing a police car being towed by a civilian tow truck is already an unusual sight. In this case, the draggin’-wagon was escorted by a fire engine with sirens blazing, inciting understandable hypothesis that this may have been the police car that spurred the lockdown. Clearly discernible in the video is the fact that the rear window of this patrol car being pulled down the road by a Red’s tow truck seems intact.

rearintact

This inconsistency calls into question the entire narrative spun about the downtown lockdown of 12 February 2020. In the absence of information from official sources, speculation becomes inevitable. The most sinister explanation suggests that the entire circus was possibly a training operation; that Mayor Engen, controlling the response from a fortified command center, tested the tactical capabilities of local law enforcement by mobilizing at least eight different agencies in armed response, occupying downtown Missoula with an army of militarized enforcers. This occupying army included personnel from agencies including the FBI, the US Marshals, the US Department of Interior, the Montana Highway Patrol, and even Fish-Wildlife-and-Parks.

Unless a plausible official narrative is offered to counter Missoula’s runaway speculations, they will only continue to become more outrageous. The traumatic and fear-provoking effect that such rumors produce in local residents is such that efforts by officials to quell them seem like they might be in the public good.

However, factual and plausible official explanations can only be used to quell such rumors if said rumors are untrue. Silence from official quarters only fuels speculation. Indeed, nearly a week after the incident, that silence persists. The February 16th edition of the Missoulian, the first Sunday publication after the event, contains no new coverage of the incident – the biggest local news story of 2020 by far.

5e4477c0722f0.image

Whether the downtown lockdown and Brandon Bryant’s politically-motivated arrest are connected or not, they are now inextricably linked in the public imagination.

That lockdown transpiring as it did, right on the heels of Bryant’s arrest, connected him in the public rumor mill from the very beginning. And even though his involvement as the “shooter” was impossible, the events themselves were so extreme that many have found it plausible the Mayor and Council had him in mind when they responded to the alleged shooting.

Nearly a week after his arrest, Bryant’s situation remains unresolved. Most local mainstream media coverage remains highly critical of him, thereby playing into the City government’s agenda of quashing anti-TIF activism, whether deliberately or not. One local media outlet, Montana Public Radio, has at least called into question the fine line between First Amendment free speech rights and limitations on threatening language. They acknowledge that jailing anyone for speech is a delicate decision at best, and that Brandon Bryant’s legal case will be a bellwether for the free speech rights of activists and dissenters nationwide.

In that way Brandon Bryant shares something in common with his hometown. The precise reason why the TIF debate has played out so passionately in Missoula is because Missoula is an extremely significant microcosm for 21st Century development. A canary in the coal mine. Missoula’s trajectory is indicative of the trajectory of many similar-sized cities across the country. The confluence of climate upheaval, economic stresses and public unrest in Missoula make it a unique and influential location. Over the coming months, Missoula’s District Court will serve as the arena for a legal battle that will signal momentous precedents for activists and dissenters across the country. If they can jail a world renowned whistle-blower for opposing the agenda of an allegedly corrupt local government, what else can they do?

If they can jail a decorated combat veteran with no criminal record for speaking out, what can they do to you?

Pawel-Kuczynski
Gabrielle Lafayette is the executive producer for the Outer Limits Radio Show.
This cache of thought is presented free of charge as a service and gift to you.
May our eternal vigilance help liberate all beings from the smoke-and-mirrors deceptions of the Samsaric Panopticon.