Tag Archives: WEF

Beware The Texas Civil War Bait Dangling From Another J6 Trap

by

This coming April, Hollywood is set to release a movie called Civil War that depicts a conflict between the Federal Government and so-called “separatist forces” in Texas and California. Meanwhile, Texas Governor Greg Abbot floats the possibility of an actual civil war due to an ongoing jurisdictional grievance about how America’s borders should be managed. Following the deployment of dozens of National Guard units to Texas, more than 700,000 truckers are purportedly amassing in Texas on Saturday for the “take our border back” convoy as part of the Army Of God in support of the new efforts behind Abbot’s Operation Lone Star.

This chapter began in September when Texas authorities put up concertina wire in Shelby Park at Eagle Pass to stop the most prominent influx point for illegals pouring into the country. The Biden Administration swiftly ordered that wire to be cut, issuing a 24-hour ultimatum that was “forcefully rejected” by the Attorney General of Texas. The Supreme Court then ruled on 22 January 2024 that Texas could not block feds from cutting the wire.

When the outrage finally hit fever pitch, Governor Abbot (who is in India right now) stepped into his role as controlled opposition and published an open letter officially referencing the invasion clause of the Constitution in order “to invoke Texas’s constitutional authority to defend and protect itself” before deploying the Texas National Guard. Twenty-five State Governors signed a letter in support of Texas, with nearly half of those states deploying additional National Guard and law enforcement resources to Texas.

From the letter:

“We stand in solidarity with our fellow Governor, Greg Abbott, and the State of Texas in utilizing every tool and strategy, including razor wire fences, to secure the border. We do it in part because the Biden Administration is refusing to enforce immigration laws already on the books and is illegally allowing mass parole across America of migrants who entered our country illegally.”

The Biden Administration falsely claimed that the southern border couldn’t be closed without new legislation from Congress before threatening to nationalize the Texas National Guard (which is a bit redundant since National Guard units already deploy on Federal orders, in addition to their duties to their individual State). Abbot fired back, claiming that he was “prepared” for such an outcome.

Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick since appeared on Fox News to ask, “What is this going to turn into, a civil war? You’ve got the Texas rights versus federal rights, both sides with guns?” Louisiana Congressman Clay Higgins echoed this sentiment in a tweet, stating that President Biden is “staging civil war” by ordering the removal of border barriers.

But the Border Patrol Union has since announced that it has no plans to either cut the razor wire or arrest Texas authorities for following lawful orders from their Governor.

The stage is set for something awful to happen as a “showdown” between Feds and Texas authorities seems more and more likely. Many Americans are now traveling to Texas in the hopes of witnessing history and supporting the enforcement of lawful border security. Unfortunately, this noble pursuit will likely be exploited in exactly the same way it was at the January 6th protests of 2021. The Feds placed people on the terrorist No Fly List just for being in Washington DC that day, even if they never went into the Capitol. And those who were led into the Capitol by law enforcement were later charged with terrorism and sentenced to draconian prison terms. If a protester’s license plate is observed by a Texas traffic camera, will that be enough for the Feds to retroactively charge that person with terrorism? The warning signs of a similar scenario taking place in Texas are present for any who care to read the writing on the wall.

Ten retired FBI senior executives warned congressional leaders in a letter last month that the US is suffering a “soft invasion” by thousands of “military aged men” from “hostile nations” from across the southern border:

“It would be difficult to overstate the danger represented by the presence inside our borders of what is comparatively a multi-division army of young single adult males from hostile nations and regions whose background, intent, or allegiance is completely unknown.”

Even known terrorists are now passing through border stations and making their way into the heartland. The recent arrest in Minnesota of a reported al-Shabaab insurgent revealed the greater security hole befalling the United States. Infamous offenders on Homeland Security’s “terror watchlist” regularly bypass the international border and roam throughout the country. Citing an anonymous source, the Daily Caller reports that, “50 individuals on the terror watchlist were caught between October and December of last year alone.”

Meanwhile, a new program introduced by the Biden Administration allows migrants to bypass the mess at America’s southern border by flying straight into a US city of their choosing. More than 210,000 illegals have flown directly into 43 cities, according to the Department of Homeland Security. At the same time, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas now faces impeachment for violating his oath by “willfully failing to secure our borders.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appeared in Yuma, Arizona over the summer to show Americans what was happening at our southern border, later declaring that the “cartels are running immigration policy in this country.” He revealed that Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations (DTOs) have facilitated the trafficking of more than 7 million illegal migrants from 117 countries into America throughout the past three years (that number now looks to be at least ten million, with more than 300,000 official border violations just in the month of December 2023).

Elon Musk visited Eagle Pass, Texas, the epicenter of this situation, after Feds were ordered to disable Texas’ barriers the first time back in September 2023. Musk illustrated how the world has come to revere America’s borders as OPEN, attracting millions more migrants than officials have reported, the majority of whom are military aged and not from Latin America.

The Daily Mail reported in October that “America’s Border War Has Begun” following a siege led by Texas Rangers to re-take a large river island near Fronton, Texas from heavily armed DTO gangs that had fortified it with improved fighting positions and sniper nests.

In December 2023, Muckraker reported on recently discovered NGO-funded mass migration blueprints with the declaration, “The collapse of the US southern border is the result of a carefully planned and deliberately executed industrial mass migration program.” From the link:

“According to an August report by progressive left-leaning media watchdog organization Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, President Biden’s Department of Homeland Security allocated $363 million to NGOs to assist illegal aliens once in the US.”

The Take Our Border Back website is “calling all active & retired law enforcement and military, Veterans, Mama Bears, elected officials, business owners, ranchers, truckers, bikers, media and LAW ABIDING, freedom-loving Americans” to show up and protest Washington’s deliberate mishandling of the crisis.

The fact that Governor Abbot is a member of the World Economic Forum in Davos should tell us everything we need to know.

That Abbot waited until now – after years of escalating conflicts – to pretend to do something about it, reveals the greater hand at play. Texans who live near the Mexican border have been suffering escalating robberies, vandalism and assaults at the hands of nefarious cartel elements for the past two and a half years. They’ve complained to their elected bureaucrats but nothing happened until the election year, when the ruling elites could figure out how to channel and absorb the palpable hatred against them into an outcome that benefits them. Many analysts are warning patriotic Americans to stay away from the conflict, as it appears to be a likely reincarnation of the J6 entrapment scheme.

The path toward tyranny follows a serpentine course of left then right just like a hockey puck is nudged down an ice rink. We’re managed by a corporate Democrat for a period of four to eight years, and predictably returned to the management of a corporate Republican for the next period. One administration sets up the tee ball and the other knocks it out of the park. Goldman Sachs and the war machine fund both parties, and both parties circle the wagons on war and bank bailouts.

The American immigration crisis has steadily snowballed into the avalanche it is today as a matter of deliberate policy. Trump’s administration may not have started any new wars, but it dropped a bomb, on average, every 12 minutes just in the first year. This was an extension of the Obama Administration’s dramatic acceleration of the drone war from the extremes waged by the W. Administration that started this whole “War On Terror” in the first place. General Wesley Clark’s warning that the United States intended to invade and overthrow “7 countries in 5 years” was nearly fulfilled at the end of Obama’s term, with only two exceptions: Iran and Lebanon.

Basic context for why this immigration crisis has been occurring in the western world remains consistently absent from corporate media headlines, especially with regards to the swarms of displaced refugees fleeing America’s constant bombardment of drone attacks across the entire Middle East. As the empire has consistently destabilized the entire region, one country at a time, those people began to flee away from the smoldering craters they once called home. They sought a better life and most looked for it in Europe and the Americas.

While cities like New York, Chicago and Washington DC once proudly identified themselves as “sanctuary cities” with politicians proclaiming that “no one is illegal,” those voices have since reversed their stance. After New York legislated mandatory housing for illegals, bus loads of migrants arrived and filled every hotel in the city at taxpayer expense. Veterans were kicked out of their housing to make way for illegals. Schools were closed down to make room for illegals. Americans were asked to open up their private homes to illegals. Chicago’s O’Hare Airport and Boston’s Logan Airport recently became de facto migrant shelters.

Perhaps the most telling anecdote related to this crisis comes in the form of a video that recently surfaced of two NYPD officers unable to defend themselves against an attack by a group of four illegal migrants who were all subsequently released without bail.

New York Mayor Eric Adams admitted in September that the constant incoming waves of illegals would, “destroy New York City” and that “The city we knew, we’re about to lose.”

“This will destroy New York City. Destroy New York City,” Adams repeated. “We’re getting 10,000 migrants a month. … One hundred ten thousand migrants we have to feed, clothe, house, educate the children, wash their laundry sheets, give them everything they need, health care.”

With New York’s social services completely overwhelmed and school playing fields repurposed into tent cities, the rhetoric from this so-called “sanctuary city” shifted dramatically in 2023. Adams blamed the Federal Government for not doing more to help New York and blamed Governor Abbot for busing illegals to the Empire State. Adams’ senior advisor soon thereafter called on the Federal Government to “close the border” to stop the flow of migrants into New York City.

Surely Mr. Adams and his apparatchiks share some of the blame for pushing these crazy policies in the first place. Being that states like New York, California and Illinois that called Texans “racist” for stating the obvious are now experiencing the greatest adverse affects of America’s open border policies, it seems decidedly ironic that they decided not to endorse Texas’s effort to enforce the law.

After decades of drone bombings all over the world, the chickens are coming home to roost through America’s border. Sanctuary cities willfully absorbed the problem until they began drowning in the consequences of their “solutions” to the crisis. The Hegelian Dialectic strategy of manipulating society seems clear enough; the authorities create a problem until public outrage makes demands on the authorities to “do something” which then justifies whatever totalitarian aims those in power wish to impose. We’re meant to respond to these crises with the familiar chorus of, “The government should do something about this!” But we’ve been here before, and many are beginning to realize that it may be time to stop asking the government to fix the problems it’s responsible for creating. Those still seeking a government solution are placing their hopes in the vague language of a $14 Billion “border bill” that promises to do absolutely nothing but further enrich the very interests responsible for the problem.

As Brandon Smith at Alt-Market observes, the Pentagon’s Operation Garden Plot (created in coordination with the REX-84 martial law protocol) cited social breakdown as a result of uncontrolled mass migration and ensuing economic unrest. Given that Dick Durbin and other scumbag politicians have been pushing the idea of military service for illegal immigrants in exchange for citizenship, Smith’s hypothesis that the so-called “great replacement” is more about erasing American communities by diluting society with masses unfamiliar with the concept of individual liberty and personal sovereignty nails the stated intentions of the cultural engineers who have been publishing their plans for decades.

After years of watching our systems crumble apart due to deliberate malfeasance, support for Texas seems fundamental to American interests. However, this moment looks to be the point of no return. We can absolutely expect the Feds to come down even harder on “high value targets” of this movement than those they crushed for participating in the J6 Capitol protests. Our governments have failed us, the people are pissed about it, and now they’ve been invited to a “showdown” with the Feds in Texas.

Are You Ready For Another Lockdown?

by

The bad sequel to Covid Lockdown is here with all the same themes as last time, complete with the impositions of social distancing, solitary confinement, face burkas, a moratorium on large gatherings and that false light at the end of the tunnel called “two weeks to flatten the curve.” It’s déjà vu all over again.

As noted by Summit News, Morris Brown College reinstated covid measures a week after classes began as part of a “precautionary step”. The measures include the reintroduction of masks, social distancing and that Gestapo-era profiling tactic called “contact tracing.” They say these measures are only temporary, projecting a duration of just “two weeks.”

Around the same time, Lionsgate studios of Hollywood also reinstated mask mandates at their offices in Santa Monica, California. Kaiser Permanente Hospital in Santa Rosa, California likewise reintroduced mask mandates, as did Upstate Community Hospital in Syracuse, New York.

Then on 23 August, CNN announced via Xwitter,

“If you’re at high risk of serious illness or death from Covid-19, it’s time to dust off those N95 masks, according to a growing number of experts.”

It’s been nearly two years since a former FDA Commissioner admitted that “social distancing” guidelines pushed by the CDC were “arbitrary” and “not science based.” More recently, the Cochrane Institute published a review at the beginning of 2023 concluding that masks made “little to no difference” to covid infection or death rates, citing 78 global studies encompassing over one million participants. To the contrary, an overwhelming body of evidence shows just how much damage compulsory face-masking is responsible for. One mask study published by NIH illustrates how N95 masks actually expose wearers to dangerous levels of toxic compounds linked to seizures and cancer:

“The study found that the chemicals released by these masks had eight times the recommended safety limit of toxic volatile organic compounds (TVOCs). Inhaling TVOCs has been linked to health issues like headaches and nausea, while prolonged and repeated has been linked to organ damage and even cancer.”

Nevertheless, several institutions and companies have recently embraced the paranoia of the Covidian nightmare once again. The story they want us all to uncritically repeat involves a “growing concern” ostensibly linked to a covid variant called “Eris” (also known as “EG.5”), another called “BA.2.86” (that infects vaccinated people), and yet another called “XBB.1.5” (that has it’s very own song performed by Jimmy Fallon). The Daily Mail’s subsequent brand of covid hysteria mirrors the frantic concerns expressed by CBS over the alleged new and deadly (and fictitious) covid strain “discovered” in Michigan. Like the ever-growing “kill lists” of the war on terror, the threats seem to multiply the more we “fight” them.

In the wake of these developments, the Associated Press vomited up more “nothing to see here” nonsense to assure us that the recent hubbub of “lockdown talk” is the work of one lone conspiracy theorist maliciously spreading “false information”. Their pathetic, three-paragraph rebuttal ignores the well-documented return of illegal and unscientific lockdown policies. As usual, they want us focused on the fear instead of the facts.

The Daily Mail further muddied the waters, admitting on the one hand that “mask mania” has started sweeping America again, while on the other, dismissing the deeper implications as baseless clickbait promulgated exclusively by “disgraced” conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. Saying he wanted to stop it by exposing it, Jones interviewed alleged whistleblowers from the TSA and Border Patrol who claim that the Biden Administration plans to implement full lockdown measures to begin in mid September. But apart from these conversations there are many other indicators and red flags signaling another wave of global lockdowns in the coming weeks and months.

For example, take the recent federal allotment of $1.4 billion for “defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies for more Covid ‘countermeasures’ and vaccines” scheduled to begin this autumn. Natalie Winters discovered giant new contracts with the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs for the purchase of “COVID test kits” and “COVID equipment”:

She says, “The curious part about these contracts and why I think it is so damning is because if you look at the start and stop dates on a lot of these contracts, not only are they projected start in the future, so in September and October, but some of these contracts, which have to do with enforcing what they call ‘COVID-19 safety protocols’ extend all the way to the year 2028.“

This week President Biden mouthed his plan to ask Congress for funding to develop a new COVID-19 vaccine and require everyone to take it “whether they previously received a vaccine or not.” This comes after CDC Director Mandy Cohen recently announced a new booster shot – that she claims was specifically tailored to the new variant – would be available by the second or third week of September.

Anthony Fauci is also calling for another round of lockdowns to force vaccinations, maintaining the claim that the 2020 lockdowns were justified and effective:

“If you have a vaccine available, you might want to lock down temporarily so you can get everybody vaccinated.”

Fauci continued by declaring that “climate change” is “playing a role” in causing outbreaks, calling for an “international commitment to decrease the carbon imprint in society so you don’t have the kinds of crazy weather we’re having in this country.”

Over the last year, unhinged statements concerned with bringing back COVID-style lockdowns for climate change have appeared with increasing regularity in our media:

The Los Angeles Times suggested we should live with the “occasional blackout,” as it would be an acceptable inconvenience to fight climate change, even though a Los Angeles energy official said that “someone dies every time we have a power outage.”

But several academic institutions have concluded that the 2020 lockdowns did far more harm than good:

“Researchers from Johns Hopkins University, in the US, Lund University, in Sweden and the Centre for Political Studies, in Denmark, said the costs to society far outweighed the benefits and called for lockdown to be “rejected out of hand” as a future pandemic policy.”

The 2020 lockdowns also exploded the suicide statistics. By the end of 2020 Americans’ mental health had fallen to a 20-year low in sync with a surge of student suicides. CDC Director Robert Redfield admitted that suicides and drug overdoses had surpassed the death rate for covid among high school students. This was corroborated by a California hospital doctor who told reporters that during lockdown he witnessed “a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the last four weeks.”

Britain’s health secretary, Matt Hancock, recently admitted that his government’s pandemic strategy proved “woefully inadequate” with statements about how “profoundly sorry” he was for his role in it. But rather than dialing back governmental overreach, Hancock’s proposed solution to this problem involves implementing those “woefully inadequate” mandates earlier and more strictly. His logic suggests that we should do the wrong thing with greater gusto. He ultimately seems to believe that our irrational authorities have failed to govern us hard enough:

“It is central to what we must learn as a country that we’ve got to be ready to hit a pandemic hard. We’ve got to be able to take action – lockdown action if necessary – that is wider, earlier, more stringent than feels comfortable at the time.”

Klaus Schwab and his cult know they can’t enact their dictatorial dreams without our consent, so they scare us into consenting by tugging at our fear of death. To bypass the democratic process of individual nations, the WHO gained the legal ability to impose global lockdowns just a few months ago.

In May of 2023, the WHO passed a treaty essentially striping nations of their sovereignty and eliminating personal freedoms. The same unelected body has also passed illegitimate laws to censor any speech critical of the ruling regime that (they say) preempts the laws and statutes of individual countries.

Among the treaty’s signatories was Germany’s health minister Karl Lauterbach, who is known as an ardent supporter of draconian Covid measures, including Covid jab mandates. Lauterbach allegedly began spewing apocalyptic predictions of the “certainty” of future pandemics following his meeting with Bill Gates in Munich earlier this year.

But it would seem that after three years of media gas lighting and fear mongering, the vox populi reflects an awakening population no longer willing to swallow the snake oil. Case in point, Rutger’s University is now enduring their very own “Bud Light Moment” after continuing to coerce students into complying with Covidian mandates in spite of the CDC decision to officially “end the pandemic” on 11 May 2023.

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson publicly condemned the trend of renewed lockdown measures during a speech for an organization called Moms for Liberty.

“They won’t admit their mistakes in handling COVID. When we examine how the federal government managed COVID, spanning two administrations, it’s hard to see it as anything but a thorough and unfortunate failure,” he shared with the Washington Examiner in May. The senator noted that the White House refuses to acknowledge the significant human toll and economic devastation caused by the shutdowns.”

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo likewise encourages citizens not to comply with the next round of lockdowns:

“What do you call re-imposing mask policies that have been proven ineffective or restarting lockdowns that are known to cause harm? You don’t call it sanity. These terrible policies only work with your cooperation. How about refusing to participate…”

Ladepo’s Xweet comes on the heels of Governor DeSantis’ decision to permanently ban mask mandates in the Sunshine State. This decision was not only based in authentic science, but backed up by an embarrassment of riches and documented by some of the very agencies (CDC, etc.) that publish such truths in the New England Journal of Medicine while simultaneously promulgating panic in the mass media.

Maintaining power in today’s established tyrannies involves outlandish demands of the people based upon a collective fear of existential threats that are as amorphous as they are nonexistent. A war on terrorism can never be concluded so it’s a perfect formula to continuously rob people of their liberties. But the Covidian narrative has provided an even richer well for mining and harvesting the fear of nations. The threat doesn’t even have to possess a deliberate murderous intent to wreak havoc. It’s an “invisible enemy” we’re told, experienced through conflicts with people based on adversarial political rivalries which then make the invisible visible. Voldemort incarnate.

When hypnotically repeated by corporate talking heads from around the world who are all reading the same script from their teleprompters, this kind of fear mongering has proven successful in the manufacturing of large numbers of people wilfully succumbing to debilitating mental illnesses like hypochondria, agoraphobia, and germophobia. Meanwhile, the corporate forces fomenting the fear consistently profit and gain power from the disasters they create.

But after three years of daily betraying their own senses and morals by obediently cowing to the tyrannical dictates of irrational authorities that are obviously pathological liars, a solid majority of people are now “covid fatigued”. Pfizer started pushing their “Eris” booster this month, the eighth dose of mRNA prescribed in under three years for “true believers” who are “following the science.” But according to CDC data, only 17% of Americans consented to covid boosters. A majority consciousness has begun to realize that we trust the authorities at our own peril and we demonize our neighbors at our own demise.

Now the ramp appears to be rapidly materializing before us again, accelerating more authoritarian controls with another round of faith-based circle-logic. The last three years may appear to us later as an inoculation against fear and the corporate propaganda that produces it. If not, the next wave of state terrorism through mass media that feeds the frequencies of paranoia, anxiety and suspicion may overwhelm those who’ve chosen to keep their heads in the sand. This isn’t just an intelligence test anymore. It’s a test of our intestinal fortitude or lack thereof.

The First Rule of BlackRock is You Do Not Talk About BlackRock

by

Last month a loose-lipped BlackRock recruiter confirmed what George Carlin said twenty years ago: that politicians are for sale; that war is good for Wall Street; that the captains of industry own everything, including all of the big media companies; that “they’ve got you by the balls!”

James O’Keefe’s latest hidden camera investigation pulls the curtain back on the singular company that leverages more control over the entire world than any other. The curt concessions came from a young BlackRock headhunter named Serge Varlay, who probably thought his date would be impressed with BlackRock’s absolute power when he so eagerly spilled the beans about their methods of manipulating the world to their will.

The shocking admissions caught on tape include Serge ominously leaning over the table toward his date and saying to her, “Let me tell you, it’s not who the president is. It’s who’s controlling the wallet of the president.”

His date asks, “And who’s that?”

“The hedge funds, BlackRock, the banks,” Varlay says. “These guys run the world.”

He goes on to admit that “You can buy your candidates,” through campaign financing.

His date asks, “How so?”

“All of these financial institutions, they buy politicians.”

“How do they run the world?”

“You acquire stuff,” Serge explains. “You diversify. You acquire. You keep acquiring. You spend whatever you make in acquiring more.”

His date ponders this for a moment before asking, “And then once you just own a little bit of everything, is that where the control–”

“Yeah. You own a little bit of everything and that little bit of everything gives you so much money on a yearly basis that you can take this big fuck-ton of money and then you can start to buy people. Obviously we have this system in place. First, there’s the senators. These guys are fucking cheap. You got ten grand? You can buy a senator. It doesn’t matter who wins. They’re in my pocket at this point. … I could give you $500k right now, no questions asked. Are you gonna do what needs to be done? Yeah! Of course! Why not?”

“Yeah. You own a little bit of everything and that little bit of everything gives you so much money on a yearly basis that you can take this big fuck-ton of money and then you can start to buy people. Obviously we have this system in place. First, there’s the senators. These guys are fucking cheap. You got ten grand? You can buy a senator. It doesn’t matter who wins. They’re in my pocket at this point. … I could give you $500k right now, no questions asked. Are you gonna do what needs to be done? Yeah! Of course! Why not?”

“Does like, everybody do that? Does BlackRock do that?”

Varlay smiles, “Everyone does that.”

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink

BlackRock was founded in partnership with Blackstone Group in 1988. Within just five years, BlackRock’s founder, Larry Fink, grew the company from $5 million in value to over $8 Billion. The investment firm that today controls a massive number of shares in the largest companies in the world began by managing pensions and university endowments, as well as the portfolios of their super wealthy clients.

The lion’s share of BlackRock’s business model hinges on Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). Not unlike mutual funds, ETFs contain diversified investments that reduce investor risk. Rather than buying stock in a single company, this fund purchases and bundles a wide variety of stocks, commodities and securities together into a low-risk investment for clients to buy into.

In 1998 BlackRock created their highly lucrative Aladdin portfolio management system that can predict the possible outcome of every investment and collect information on all investors who contribute to their profits. The software ultimately predicts the likelihood of investment failures.

As the name indicates, the Aladdin technology proved to be a magical Genie that took Fink and BlackRock straight to the top of the market. Today BlackRock has over $9 trillion in Assets Under Management (AUM) and another $20 Trillion managed by Aladdin.

Keen to “never let a good crisis go to waste,” exploiting economic uncertainty has proven to be the key that unlocked BlackRock’s rise to absolute power. After promoting the very Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) that unleashed the housing bubble crisis in 2008, the subsequent financial crash allowed BlackRock to secure uncontested control of many failing banks and their assets. It also provided Larry Fink with a direct line to the American Federal Government.

The same thing happened in 2020 during the early days of the Plandemic when the American government asked BlackRock to funnel Federal Reserve money into “special purpose vehicles” to acquire risky debt under the CARES Act with a $4.5 trillion leveraged buyout. The following year BlackRock began gobbling up entire neighborhoods, buying up houses and properties as investments that no one will ever live in. This lowered the total supply of housing which contributed to higher demand and in turn skyrocketing housing prices. It also forced would-be home buyers to compete with the giant multinational investment firm for housing. Real estate consultant John Burns estimated at the time that “roughly 20% of homes sold are bought by someone who never moves in.”

BlackRock has consolidated so much power that it essentially controls the world, as their total global assets amount to a sum greater than America’s total GDP. They enjoy so much power that they’ve even been referred to as “the Fourth Branch of Government” by Bloomberg. With all of those resources controlled by a single monolith, one might wonder how this gargantuan monopoly monstrosity is allowed to exist. But BlackRock doesn’t technically own these companies, nor does it even own shares of them. It’s their clients who own the shares. BlackRock just manages them. And many of BlackRock’s investors don’t even know they’re investors because they’re simply part of a pension fund or an endowment that BlackRock manages.

Through these mechanisms, a single company now controls such large ratios of stock that many large corporations cannot make significant moves without BlackRock’s approval.

Today BlackRock manages approximately 10% of the entire world economy through its constituent assets. Because BlackRock is one of the biggest investors in global giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Anheuser-Busch, Meta, Target, Proctor & Gamble, Comcast, CNN, Disney, Fox and Pfizer, these companies must consult with BlackRock before doing anything of consequence. By owning huge pieces of all competing corporations they’ve created a global monopoly spiderweb.

To maintain their ever-growing dominance, it’s important for the giant to avoid making headlines as a matter of corporate policy.

As Serge Varlay told his date, “They [Blackrock] don’t want to be in the news. They don’t want people to talk about them. They don’t want to be anywhere on the radar.”

She asked, “Why not?”

Varlay pondered for a moment before responding, “I don’t know, but I suspect it’s probably because it’s easier to do things when people aren’t thinking about it.”

BlackRock would definitely prefer you never think about them at all, and if you must, they want you to think they’re socially and environmentally responsible. So in the wake of the 2020 George Floyd protests BlackRock publicly stated that companies must serve a social purpose, pledging that they would now score businesses on an ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) score to “force behaviors” on individuals and companies.

The ESG concept was formed in 2004 but didn’t achieve critical mass until BlackRock began sporting it in 2020, when the timing was right. ESG essentially ranks how “woke” a company is like a dystopian social credit score for businesses. The Consumers’ Research nonprofit asserts that, “political activists use ESG as a way to drive a progressive agenda” to “help push this agenda through economic coercion and ignoring democratic processes.”

Companies are not just competing with each other for best credit score or highest quarterly earnings statement anymore, but now for the highest ESG score. This feat is ostensibly earned through the promise of increased diversity hires and embrace of environmentally friendly policies. But this pursuit has only resulted in a massive resurgence of corporate greenwashing; advertising campaigns designed to fool consumers into believing that dirty companies are cleaner than they actually are.

While BlackRock claims to champion ESG investing, BlackRock itself remains the largest investor in fossil fuels and war profiteering, maintaining friendly relationships with human rights violators the world over. Moreover, the company admitted to the business community that it’s only pretending to be woke. In his 2022 letter to CEO’s, Larry Fink writes,

“It is not a social or ideological agenda. It is not “woke”. It is capitalism, driven by mutually beneficial relationships between you and the employees, customers, suppliers, and communities your company relies on to prosper. This is the power of capitalism.”

Corporate advertisements have always embraced whatever flavor-of-the-week suited them to earn consumer confidence and score a short-term profit. They don’t actually believe in anything, and the exploitation of your beliefs is just routine business to them.

BlackRock claims that climate risk equates to investment risk. So in 2021 BlackRock reshaped Exxon Mobile’s board of directors to “help combat climate change”. But the fact that BlackRock remained the world’s single biggest investor in fossil fuels confirms the rhetoric was just more focus-grouped virtue signaling.

Similarly, while BlackRock whines publicly about the atrocities of gun violence, they’re simultaneously the single-largest investor in gun manufacturing. This seems especially difficult to fathom when BlackRock engages in the deliberate irony of blaming gun manufacturers for not doing more to protect the lives of the American people.

Meanwhile BlackRock’s U.S. Aerospace and Defense Fund invests billions in major weapons contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and other merchants of death. These companies receive billions in Pentagon contracts to literally weaponize taxpayer money to fund unprovoked bombings and illegal wars around the globe that produce lots of civilian casualties. Often these weapons are supplied to foreign governments like Saudi Arabia, which received weapons from the U.S. government before using them to indiscriminately commit genocide against civilians in Yemen.

Serge Varlay confirms that war is damn good for BlackRock’s bottom line, jovially telling his date that, “Ukraine is good for business. You know that, right?”

He went to admit that, “We [BlackRock] don’t want the conflict to end.”

“Why?”

“We don’t want the conflict to end as a country. The longer this goes on, the weaker Russia is. … I’ll give an example: Russia blows up Ukraine’s grain silos. Price of wheat’s gonna go mad up. So what are you gonna do if you’re a trading firm? The moment that news hits–within a millisecond–you’re going to pump trades into whoever the wheat suppliers are; into their stocks. Within an hour or two, that stock goes fucking up. And then you sell and you just made, I don’t know, however many mil.”

Next she asks him, “Why would a news channel promote a side in war?”

“Because it’s also good for business too. I mean, what’s news? News right? What does news feed on? They feed on tragedy. They feed on fucked up events. That’s what people like to watch. So when it happens, it’s good business. More viewers. When nothing’s happening, who the fuck watches news? I don’t watch the news.”

“They’re all pushing like, the same talking point. Like generally, when you look at news, like–”

“It’s propaganda,” Varlay tells her. “The Ukrainian economy is very largely tied to the wheat market; global wheat market. This is fantastic if you’re trading. Volatility creates opportunity to make profit. … War is real fucking good for business.”

Then Serge reveals the true sociopath mentality that lives within firms like BlackRock, gleefully confiding in his new friend that, “It’s exciting when shit goes wrong. Right?”

BlackRock has poised itself to be a chief benefactor in the effort to fund Ukraine’s push to Build Back Better. The investment giant recently teamed up with JP Morgan to set up a “reconstruction bank” to fund the half-trillion dollar investment to rebuild war torn Ukraine:

The Ukraine Development Fund is still in the early stages of setting up the reconstruction bank, but potential investors will get an inside preview of how things will look during a London conference that is set to take place this week. With the steep cost to rebuild, the Ukrainian government reached out to BlackRock in November to see if there was a conceivable way of attracting investments. JP Morgan was soon added in February.

Despite it’s emphasis on ESG investing, BlackRock consistently and predictably overlooks human rights in favor of monetary gain.

Putting all of this into perspective, we can better understand the following warning about BlackRock from Consumers’ Research:

“U.S. Consumers should be wary of investments managed by BlackRock Investment Management Company. Led by Chairman and CEO Larry Fink, the company uses its clout to push a radical agenda in coordination with other financiers through a network of international organizations. This Consumer Warning highlights the commitments BlackRock has made with their investors’ money—commitments that adversely impact the U.S. economy and likely violate their fiduciary duty to seek the best return, putting your retirement at risk in the name of progressive politics.”

Investing in Chinese military companies and praising totalitarian governments are chilling indications of the management empire that BlackRock is working to finalize. BlackRock is also officially the first global asset manager to have access to the Chinese Communist Party’s mutual fund. When we consider that Larry Fink also serves on the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum, we can better understand why the BlackRock monolith now attempts to foist violent changes upon existing social and political systems of the world, in lockstep with Davos’ other true believers of the “Great Reset” agenda. This is why the sudden and overwhelming prevalence of bewildering woke ideology in every facet of the business world. It’s part of a coordinated effort to socially engineer the populace into such a hypnosis that we’ll accept their New World Order nightmare as a dream. In short, the plan is for us to own nothing and “be happy.”

Through a stalwart commitment to acquisition, investment firms like BlackRock wield more power than the executives at the companies they own shares in. Laws could ostensibly be passed limiting how much influence an investment firm can have over companies it’s invested in, but since they own the politicians who pass the laws it seems highly unlikely that such an outcome would ever be allowed to occur.

BlackRock isn’t the only mechanism for worldwide institutional control. The second and third largest investment firms in the world, Vanguard and State Street, respectively, are guilty of the exact same behavior. Together, these three investment giants became the largest shareholders in 90% of S&P 500 firms. And the list of worthy runners-up who would each kill for a chance at a promotion to King Asshole looks endless.

And while it may be true that businesses that go woke do, in fact, go broke, the money doesn’t seem to matter as much to the multinational corporations as their ESG score. As companies like Anheuser-Busch hemorrhage profits in the wake of a woke Bud Light scandal, they’re quietly assured behind the scenes that they’ll be allowed to exist in “the new economy” regardless of how much money they lose, as long as their score remains high.

In the weeks after James O’Keefe’s hidden camera viral video put BlackRock into the spotlight, Larry Fink publicly back-peddled on ESG, insisting that it was always an apolitical term that has since become “weaponized”. Fink comically insisted that “ESG issues were never meant to be political statements,” and stated that he’s “ashamed” to be part of the debate. Fink now pledges his allegiance to something called “conscientious capitalism” announcing that the semantic re-branding will displace ESG in the future.

The truth seems obvious enough. Fink is trying to get out in front of the blowback because he knows it’s only a matter of time before the mass of people figure out how much influence this one man enjoys. And with his name in the media this much, it seems like that time is about up.